Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

ATTORNEY General and Minister of Legal Affairs, Anil Nandlall, is inviting any Guyanese to file a lawsuit against the Speaker of the National Assembly, Raphael Trotman, for allowing a constitutional bill to be approved with a simple majority in the House, even as the government accuses the Deputy Speaker, Deborah Backer, of attempting a coup d’État. Nandlall was at the time appearing at a  People’s Progressive Party (PPP) media briefing at Freedom House, along with Parliamentarian and Presidential Advisor on Governance, Gail Teixeira and Junior Finance Minister Bishop Juan Edghill, among others.
Any such lawsuit Nandlall concedes, will also have to name him as a defendant, given the  nature of his office as legal advisor to and representative of the state.
Nandlall told media operatives yesterday during the party’s press briefing that he has not decided on whether the government will approach the court for a further clarification.
The Constitutional (Amendment) Bill, introduced by A Partnership for National Unity’s (APNU’s), Carl Greenidge, seeks to amend the Constitution of Guyana and was approved last Thursday in the House, by a simple majority.
The Guyana Government maintains its position that such a move requires a two- thirds majority vote.
The Attorney General told media operatives that following the debate on Thursday last, he was approached by Alliance For Change (AFC) Leader, Khemraj Ramjattan and APNU’s second-in-command, Dr Rupert Roopnarine, who according to Nandlall, “encouraged me to have the matter ventilated in the court for a clarification.”
Nandlall said the opposition members “see substance in the arguments advanced.”
The government’s legal advisor, in reminding of his hesitancy to approach the court, deferred to the citizenry, saying that he is quite sure that there are many concerned Guyanese who are interested in the matter.
The Attorney General invited members of the public to file a lawsuit against the substantive Speaker, Trotman, “for allowing the Bill to go through.”
Expanding on his hesitancy to approach the courts, Nandlall suggested that it is the Opposition that is in doubt as to whether the Bill piloted by Greenidge, can in fact amend the Guyana Constitution with a simple majority
The enraged parliamentarians met with media operatives and complained bitterly also against the Opposition’s actions in the House, with Teixeira levelling the coup d’État claims against Backer.
According to the Presidential Advisor, Backer had been asked to hold the post for the Speaker in his absence for “two hours.”
It was during this time she purportedly overthrew a ruling by the substantive Speaker Raphael Trotman, when he allowed Home Affairs Minister, Clement Rohee, to make a statement to the House at its previous sitting.
“This is not to be taken lightly, basically it was a coup… there was a coup d’État in the Parliament by the deputy who was holding the seat.”
Teixeira called the actions by Backer “an indication of the bullyism and total disregard for norms and practice and more importantly, the decisions of the Speaker.”
The PPP Member of Parliament said too that the decision by Trotman was made following months of deliberations and consultations with legal minds across the Region and farther afield.
Calling last Thursday’s decision by Backer a “new dynamic to threaten of parliamentary democracy,” Teixeira said that Conventions and Standing Orders continue to be eroded undermining  Parliament in the process.
“Clearly the mood in Parliament and the behaviour on the floor does not give one much hope that the Opposition intends to change its approach and move from one-vote dictatorship.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

What is clear here is not the fact the bill was tabled. It is pellucid to the PPP that not one member within its ranks will vote any way they party does not decide the must vote. Clearly they see the Legislature as a rubber stamp of Presidential authority.

 

The point is that there is indeed a need for a 2/3 majority to change the constitution. The Opposition can table what ever they want on the hope that some PPP members or the PPP themselves will see merit in the motion. But no! There is nothing wrong with trying to jump start the ethical dead battery in the PPP machine.

 

They are here crying and waxing all legalistic when they should be speaking on the ethics, the necessity of such a thing and vote against it if they so choose. The President will now veto it but, again, there is nothing in the constitution that says the Opposition cannot propose legislation to change or remedy any social injustice they see in the society. That these PPP members cry these crocodile tears about the legitimacy of the action without debating its relevance  it is truly despicable.

 

They should note, legitimacy of an action is not the end all of the discussion. There are things that though legitimate are immoral or anti the interest of the community.

 

This constant grating cry on the legitimacy of actions without a corresponding explanation of the moral necessity for its legitimacy is what will certainly be the disinfectant for these corruptocrats.

FM
Originally Posted by Billy Ram Balgobin:

Changing the constitution to create more security for the rights of Guyanese is a good thing. Changing the constitution as a strategy of securing political power from a elected government is bad.

I wonder if you are not ashamed of this. Were is it said that changes would be unfair to the present administration? Nothing will stop its supporters from voting for it.  The problem here is the expansion of democratic expressions and accountability into the system

FM
Originally Posted by TK:

The PNC rigged the national election and Jagdeo-Ramotar rigged the internal PPP election. 

aand your point IS???  National vs Internal is too difficult, I know and I feel for you.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by TK:

The PNC rigged the national election and Jagdeo-Ramotar rigged the internal PPP election. 

aand your point IS???  National vs Internal is too difficult, I know and I feel for you.

You not clever enough...that's why you have to file away FAFSA forms at LaGuardia. 

FM
Originally Posted by kp:

FROM ALL IMFORMATION I AM RECEIVING, THERE WILL BE A SNAP ELECTION WITHIN THE NEXT NINE MONTHS. THE PPP HAS STATS THAT THEY WILL GAIN A MAJORITY IN GOVERNMENT, TIMING IS ALL IMPORTANT.

 

Ramo is quite happy with the status quo---let the opposition AFC/PNC continue to disgrace themselves in parliament.

 

Rev

 


 

FM
Originally Posted by Rev Al:
Originally Posted by kp:

FROM ALL IMFORMATION I AM RECEIVING, THERE WILL BE A SNAP ELECTION WITHIN THE NEXT NINE MONTHS. THE PPP HAS STATS THAT THEY WILL GAIN A MAJORITY IN GOVERNMENT, TIMING IS ALL IMPORTANT.

 

Ramo is quite happy with the status quo---let the opposition AFC/PNC continue to disgrace themselves in parliament.

 

Rev

 


 

===

 

From an in side source. 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×