Skip to main content

Critics are questioning more accounts from Ben Carson’s past, including a harrowing tale of how he sheltered his white classmates during Detroit race riots.

The revelations came a day after the GOP candidate called reporters “desperate” for asking questions about his 1996 autobiography.

A fiery Carson blasted the media Friday after reports questioned the validity of his book, “Gifted Hands,” specifically suggesting he may have lied about earning a scholarship to West Point and embellished stories about his violent outbursts as a youth.

“There’s got to be a scandal. There’s got to be some nurse he’s had an affair with. There’s got to be something. They have gotten desperate,” Carson told reporters Friday night, according to CNN. “Next week, it will be my kindergarten teacher who said I peed in my pants. It’s ridiculous.”

On Friday, a new media report scrutinized two more stories from the neurosurgeon-turned-politician.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

Stormy, stop being ridiculous. Chief stated a fact about Ben Carson that is unpardonable and not befitting a US Presidential candidate. He went rogue on the Constitution to deny a Muslim the opportunity to be a President of the the USA. And his reason was to cite a tiny minority view (masquerading as Muslims) of jurisprudence that indeed is horrendous.

 

You cannot defend Carson on this, period. You even said so yourself, but then you had a bout of foot and mouth disease when you misconstrue Chief's views on how a Muslim should respect his religious teachings and confused it with his view on secular democracy with Constitutional governance.

 

You also cannot

Kari
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

You are an idiot! You said eating a ham sandwich makes you an American, did you had your ham sandwich this morning?

Chief
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

And I agree with him!

That' s ok. You are running for President for your toilet in your house.

Chief
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

You are an idiot! You said eating a ham sandwich makes you an American, did you had your ham sandwich this morning?

He probably means a hamburger. Ham sandwich has pork. Hamburger has beef.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

Stormy, stop being ridiculous. Chief stated a fact about Ben Carson that is unpardonable and not befitting a US Presidential candidate. He went rogue on the Constitution to deny a Muslim the opportunity to be a President of the the USA. And his reason was to cite a tiny minority view (masquerading as Muslims) of jurisprudence that indeed is horrendous.

 

You cannot defend Carson on this, period. You even said so yourself, but then you had a bout of foot and mouth disease when you misconstrue Chief's views on how a Muslim should respect his religious teachings and confused it with his view on secular democracy with Constitutional governance.

 

You also cannot

I thought only an American can run for the Presidency. I would want to believe a practicing muslim will not be elected to that office. The electorate will judge such a candidate. As powerful as the Jews are in the USA, they are yet to have one their own at the white house. I remember, the time of JFK, it was a big event to have a Roman Catholic elected, religious prejudices were the concerns of the day. At least, those were the sentiments of JFK's father.

 

Religion is very quiet in the equation of being elected to the White House. But it is there.

S
Last edited by seignet
Chief,
 
So this fellow is a Lying Dog who has become a swine because 
"He said Muslims must not be President of the USA"
 
That is very Un American to ,ake such statement about him as he is entitle to his opinion and so is Trump.
 
I did not see your dagger in Trump's back as yet....his position on minority does not seems to bother you as much 
 
 
 
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

 

Vish M
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

Stormy, stop being ridiculous. Chief stated a fact about Ben Carson that is unpardonable and not befitting a US Presidential candidate. He went rogue on the Constitution to deny a Muslim the opportunity to be a President of the the USA. And his reason was to cite a tiny minority view (masquerading as Muslims) of jurisprudence that indeed is horrendous.

 

You cannot defend Carson on this, period. You even said so yourself, but then you had a bout of foot and mouth disease when you misconstrue Chief's views on how a Muslim should respect his religious teachings and confused it with his view on secular democracy with Constitutional governance.

 

You also cannot

Where did I defend Carson? I said he is nuts and I think he is ...even the lunacy part.

 

Chief state it is his deen to keep sharia as primary. I say Poof! His view on islam is no less than Carson. He also once told me that he cannot speak out against a Muslim.

 

I told him that was macabre since the social contract obliges him to castigate wrongs not merely other people than Muslim wrongs.

 

That is why I said he is being duplicitous with Mr Carson whom I would see no reason to defend in a million years.

FM
Originally Posted by Vish M:
Chief,
 
So this fellow is a Lying Dog who has become a swine because 
"He said Muslims must not be President of the USA"
 
That is very Un American to ,ake such statement about him as he is entitle to his opinion and so is Trump.
 
I did not see your dagger in Trump's back as yet....his position on minority does not seems to bother you as much 
 
 
 
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

 

He is entitled to his opinion but given we are obliged to abide by the fundamental precepts of the state ( no religious test) he cannot have it both ways ( we accepting his fundamentalism).

 

My fuss with Chief is he is like Carson with respect to religious beliefs.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

Stormy, stop being ridiculous. Chief stated a fact about Ben Carson that is unpardonable and not befitting a US Presidential candidate. He went rogue on the Constitution to deny a Muslim the opportunity to be a President of the the USA. And his reason was to cite a tiny minority view (masquerading as Muslims) of jurisprudence that indeed is horrendous.

 

You cannot defend Carson on this, period. You even said so yourself, but then you had a bout of foot and mouth disease when you misconstrue Chief's views on how a Muslim should respect his religious teachings and confused it with his view on secular democracy with Constitutional governance.

 

You also cannot

Where did I defend Carson? I said he is nuts and I think he is ...even the lunacy part.

 

Chief state it is his deen to keep sharia as primary. I say Poof! His view on islam is no less than Carson. He also once told me that he cannot speak out against a Muslim.

 

I told him that was macabre since the social contract obliges him to castigate wrongs not merely other people than Muslim wrongs.

 

That is why I said he is being duplicitous with Mr Carson whom I would see no reason to defend in a million years.

Do not misquote me.

 

Our book teaches us that to cover one's fault is better than giving charity.

 

That does not mean that we must not speak out against atrocities.

 

 

 

Chief
Originally Posted by Chief:

I have said this over and over , God Bless America!

 

The Press and intelligent Americans can see through the likes of D2 and Ben Carson.

They should see through you. I am an athiest. I do not care for any religion yours or Carson's. I care less for either of you when you make stupid statements.

 

You do not like to be reminded of them but that is why I am here; to correct you when you presume you can take prerogatives you do not have ie cussing Carson when like him you are equally a religious nut.

FM
Originally Posted by Vish M:
Chief,
 
So this fellow is a Lying Dog who has become a swine because 
"He said Muslims must not be President of the USA"
 
That is very Un American to ,ake such statement about him as he is entitle to his opinion and so is Trump.
 
I did not see your dagger in Trump's back as yet....his position on minority does not seems to bother you as much 
 
 
 
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

 

Vishnu,

 

Are you in agreement that a muslim should not become President?

 

 

I remember you were on e of the posters here who was so opposed to Mr Obama when he was running for President.

Chief
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

Stormy, stop being ridiculous. Chief stated a fact about Ben Carson that is unpardonable and not befitting a US Presidential candidate. He went rogue on the Constitution to deny a Muslim the opportunity to be a President of the the USA. And his reason was to cite a tiny minority view (masquerading as Muslims) of jurisprudence that indeed is horrendous.

 

You cannot defend Carson on this, period. You even said so yourself, but then you had a bout of foot and mouth disease when you misconstrue Chief's views on how a Muslim should respect his religious teachings and confused it with his view on secular democracy with Constitutional governance.

 

You also cannot

Where did I defend Carson? I said he is nuts and I think he is ...even the lunacy part.

 

Chief state it is his deen to keep sharia as primary. I say Poof! His view on islam is no less than Carson. He also once told me that he cannot speak out against a Muslim.

 

I told him that was macabre since the social contract obliges him to castigate wrongs not merely other people than Muslim wrongs.

 

That is why I said he is being duplicitous with Mr Carson whom I would see no reason to defend in a million years.

Do not misquote me.

 

Our book teaches us that to cover one's fault is better than giving charity.

 

That does not mean that we must not speak out against atrocities.

 

 

 

You lie like a skunk. I argued with you here once on your obligation as a citizen to chastise all equally. You said you are not obliged to chastise a brother. 

 

You also said sharia is inseparable from Islam and secular law was secondary to it.

 

I am not misquoting you. I care little for you the person but I care for your ideas.

 

I have the belief and I am often told it is wrong given the existence of Atta Turks' Turkey, Tunisia, Algeriaetc that Islam is not amenable to secularization. I will maintain that belief when I see scholars from the tradition writing of the necessity to reconcile religious and secular law.

 

The Muslim professor from San Dago who wrote under the pseudonym Dara Silkoh got beat up here from the Muslim contingency  for making the comment in the religious section that there must be a global  Islamic reformation with intent to standardizing the traditions and establishing the basis for discourse with the west.

 

He said it is completely absurd to believe Islam  can exist apart from the west to which it owes a debt for  its core beliefs and with which it shares a common thread as to the validity of much of what it believes  historically.

 

Such men as him is rare in Islam and the unfortunate thing is he is the only person I ever heard of from within the Islamic academia ever articulating a need for a reformation. Instead the predominant movement in the culture is an  absurd regression into some hitherto fictive era of Islam which pervades modern fundamentalism.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

You are an idiot! You said eating a ham sandwich makes you an American, did you had your ham sandwich this morning?

I have nothing against eating ham sandwiches, ham hock, chillings or pork ribs. I was unfortunate enough to not acquired as taste for it. I do however make ham sandwiches. my kids seem to like it.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:
 

You lie like a skunk. I argued with you here once on your obligation as a citizen to chastise all equally. You said you are not obliged to chastise a brother. 

 

You also said sharia is inseparable from Islam and secular law was secondary to it.

 

I am not misquoting you. I care little for you the person but I care for your ideas.

 

I have the belief and I am often told it is wrong given the existence of Atta Turks' Turkey, Tunisia, Algeriaetc that Islam is not amenable to secularization. I will maintain that belief when I see scholars from the tradition writing of the necessity to reconcile religious and secular law.

 

The Muslim professor from San Dago who wrote under the pseudonym Dara Silkoh got beat up here from the Muslim contingency  for making the comment in the religious section that there must be a global  Islamic reformation with intent to standardizing the traditions and establishing the basis for discourse with the west.

 

He said it is completely absurd to believe Islam  can exist apart from the west to which it owes a debt for  its core beliefs and with which it shares a common thread as to the validity of much of what it believes  historically.

 

Such men as him is rare in Islam and the unfortunate thing is he is the only person I ever heard of from within the Islamic academia ever articulating a need for a reformation. Instead the predominant movement in the culture is an  absurd regression into some hitherto fictive era of Islam which pervades modern fundamentalism.

Put in your think skull, no one can reform what does not need to reform.

 

Your biases against religion and more so Islam  makes you gravitate to anyone who feel they can rewrite the scriptures.

Chief
Originally Posted by Vish M:
Chief,
 
So this fellow is a Lying Dog who has become a swine because 
"He said Muslims must not be President of the USA"
 
That is very Un American to ,ake such statement about him as he is entitle to his opinion and so is Trump.
 
I did not see your dagger in Trump's back as yet....his position on minority does not seems to bother you as much 
 
 
 
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

 

Vish, Chief was responding to Carson on an AMERICAN of MUSLIM pursuasion not bneing allowed to seek the Presidency.

Kari
Originally Posted by seignet:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

Stormy, stop being ridiculous. Chief stated a fact about Ben Carson that is unpardonable and not befitting a US Presidential candidate. He went rogue on the Constitution to deny a Muslim the opportunity to be a President of the the USA. And his reason was to cite a tiny minority view (masquerading as Muslims) of jurisprudence that indeed is horrendous.

 

You cannot defend Carson on this, period. You even said so yourself, but then you had a bout of foot and mouth disease when you misconstrue Chief's views on how a Muslim should respect his religious teachings and confused it with his view on secular democracy with Constitutional governance.

 

You also cannot

I thought only an American can run for the Presidency. I would want to believe a practicing muslim will not be elected to that office. The electorate will judge such a candidate. As powerful as the Jews are in the USA, they are yet to have one their own at the white house. I remember, the time of JFK, it was a big event to have a Roman Catholic elected, religious prejudices were the concerns of the day. At least, those were the sentiments of JFK's father.

 

Religion is very quiet in the equation of being elected to the White House. But it is there.

Seig-Heil, the issue is not whether someone with a religious persuasion CAN be elected, it's about ALLOWING that person to run - whether he can never win is another issue. Stick to the logic here.

Kari
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

You are truly a hateful prick no less than he is. You said that Muslims cannot put other laws before Islamic law. You stated that here.

 

Why do you think that Carson is hateful if that is your belief?

 

He like you is not be subscribing to the democratic notion that is the bedrock of democracy ie religious plurality and secular expression of law governs the state.

Stormy, stop being ridiculous. Chief stated a fact about Ben Carson that is unpardonable and not befitting a US Presidential candidate. He went rogue on the Constitution to deny a Muslim the opportunity to be a President of the the USA. And his reason was to cite a tiny minority view (masquerading as Muslims) of jurisprudence that indeed is horrendous.

 

You cannot defend Carson on this, period. You even said so yourself, but then you had a bout of foot and mouth disease when you misconstrue Chief's views on how a Muslim should respect his religious teachings and confused it with his view on secular democracy with Constitutional governance.

 

You also cannot

Where did I defend Carson? I said he is nuts and I think he is ...even the lunacy part.

 

Chief state it is his deen to keep sharia as primary. I say Poof! His view on islam is no less than Carson. He also once told me that he cannot speak out against a Muslim.

 

I told him that was macabre since the social contract obliges him to castigate wrongs not merely other people than Muslim wrongs.

 

That is why I said he is being duplicitous with Mr Carson whom I would see no reason to defend in a million years.

Do not misquote me.

 

Our book teaches us that to cover one's fault is better than giving charity.

 

That does not mean that we must not speak out against atrocities.

 

 

 

You lie like a skunk. I argued with you here once on your obligation as a citizen to chastise all equally. You said you are not obliged to chastise a brother. 

 

You also said sharia is inseparable from Islam and secular law was secondary to it.

 

I am not misquoting you. I care little for you the person but I care for your ideas.

 

I have the belief and I am often told it is wrong given the existence of Atta Turks' Turkey, Tunisia, Algeriaetc that Islam is not amenable to secularization. I will maintain that belief when I see scholars from the tradition writing of the necessity to reconcile religious and secular law.

 

The Muslim professor from San Dago who wrote under the pseudonym Dara Silkoh got beat up here from the Muslim contingency  for making the comment in the religious section that there must be a global  Islamic reformation with intent to standardizing the traditions and establishing the basis for discourse with the west.

 

He said it is completely absurd to believe Islam  can exist apart from the west to which it owes a debt for  its core beliefs and with which it shares a common thread as to the validity of much of what it believes  historically.

 

Such men as him is rare in Islam and the unfortunate thing is he is the only person I ever heard of from within the Islamic academia ever articulating a need for a reformation. Instead the predominant movement in the culture is an  absurd regression into some hitherto fictive era of Islam which pervades modern fundamentalism.

Regardless of how converted Muslims feels, Islam is controlled by the Middle-Eastern faction. Those countries seek after westernization, mostly modern architecture. Maybe improving quality of life, but the majority of the population are locked in time, 500 AD. What was given to them, must be maintained at all cost. For a revision, it would mean total chaos.

 

The converted Muslim is not considered in any revisions. They are adherents just as the nomads of the Middle-east. Locked in time. 

S
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Chief:
 

You lie like a skunk. I argued with you here once on your obligation as a citizen to chastise all equally. You said you are not obliged to chastise a brother. 

 

You also said sharia is inseparable from Islam and secular law was secondary to it.

 

I am not misquoting you. I care little for you the person but I care for your ideas.

 

I have the belief and I am often told it is wrong given the existence of Atta Turks' Turkey, Tunisia, Algeriaetc that Islam is not amenable to secularization. I will maintain that belief when I see scholars from the tradition writing of the necessity to reconcile religious and secular law.

 

The Muslim professor from San Dago who wrote under the pseudonym Dara Silkoh got beat up here from the Muslim contingency  for making the comment in the religious section that there must be a global  Islamic reformation with intent to standardizing the traditions and establishing the basis for discourse with the west.

 

He said it is completely absurd to believe Islam  can exist apart from the west to which it owes a debt for  its core beliefs and with which it shares a common thread as to the validity of much of what it believes  historically.

 

Such men as him is rare in Islam and the unfortunate thing is he is the only person I ever heard of from within the Islamic academia ever articulating a need for a reformation. Instead the predominant movement in the culture is an  absurd regression into some hitherto fictive era of Islam which pervades modern fundamentalism.

Put in your think skull, no one can reform what does not need to reform.

 

Your biases against religion and more so Islam  makes you gravitate to anyone who feel they can rewrite the scriptures.

That in a world where there is no immaculate conception is the ground of your fundamentalism.

 

My bias is against all religion not Islam alone. I think it is the most confusing of all and that is indeed my personal belief.

FM

It is very sad to see Islam being dragged into the mud here.

 

Why can't we keep religion and politics separate in this particular discussion ?

 

Islam has no defects, it is a small group of madmen who are not true followers of Islam who commit acts that are not in accordance with Islam and hence this misrepresentation of Islam and the message of Islam's Prophet Mohammad (PBUH).

 

 

FM
Chief,
 
 
I see you have a variety of Canine titles for others who questions your statements or assaults.
 
 
what is the inference of the label Lil Puppy? 
 
 
 
Originally Posted by Chief:

Where is this other lil puppy Vishnu?

Vishnu are you in agreement that muslims should not become President?

 

Vish M
Originally Posted by yuji22:

It is very sad to see Islam being dragged into the mud here.

 

Why can't we keep religion and politics separate in this particular discussion ?

 

Islam has no defects, it is a small group of madmen who are not true followers of Islam who commit acts that are not in accordance with Islam and hence this misrepresentation of Islam and the message of Islam's Prophet Mohammad (PBUH).

 

 

CONFUSED are you?

 

It seems to me that the Middle-east is only for the believers of Islam. ISIS is purging the enclave. Have you noticed how all dem so called muslims of the ME escaping to the West.

 

I hope the fanatics currently living in the West return to ME and join the fight. I saw this report the other day where a whole lot of women returned to fight. So much for the women giving up their life styles in western societies.  

S
Last edited by seignet
Originally Posted by Chief:

I have said this over and over , God Bless America!

 

The Press and intelligent Americans can see through the likes of D2 and Ben Carson.

But it would be heaven if Sharia rules, right!!

FM
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by Vish M:
Chief,
 
So this fellow is a Lying Dog who has become a swine because 
"He said Muslims must not be President of the USA"
 
That is very Un American to ,ake such statement about him as he is entitle to his opinion and so is Trump.
 
I did not see your dagger in Trump's back as yet....his position on minority does not seems to bother you as much 
 
 
 
Originally Posted by Chief:

tHIS IS THE SAME SWINE THAT SAID mUSLIMS MUST NOT BE pRESIDENT OF THE usa.

 

Vish, Chief was responding to Carson on an AMERICAN of MUSLIM pursuasion not bneing allowed to seek the Presidency.

A Muslim is a Muslim first, American or other second, Trojan horse.  The Caliphate is the holy land, all else are mere subjects.  A Muslim should not be allowed, just like they will not allow a Nazi to run!

FM
Originally Posted by Chief:

I have said this over and over , God Bless America!

 

The Press and intelligent Americans can see through the likes of D2 and Ben Carson.

So says the chief man wid X-Ray eyes

ball
Originally Posted by Vish M:
Chief,
 
 
I see you have a variety of Canine titles for others who questions your statements or assaults.
 
 
what is the inference of the label Lil Puppy? 
 
 
 
Originally Posted by Chief:

Where is this other lil puppy Vishnu?

Vishnu are you in agreement that muslims should not become President?

 

Do you not know what is a little puppy?

Lot's of people have them for pets/ 

Chief

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×