The PPP’s racial fear mongering is the greatest obstacle to a vision of national unity
Dear Editor, In mid March 2015 when I personally distributed pro APNU+AFC leaflets in the traditional PPP strongholds of Parika, Leonora, and Vreed En Hoop, I found that Indo Guyanese enthusiasm for the PPP was poor and I thought then that the Coalition would have won the elections by at least 60% of the votes. As it turned out, it won by less than 5,000 votes in the general elections, and by less than 3,000 votes in the regional elections. It meant the PPP managed to rally its core base and won 49% of the votes. How did the PPP manage to turn around its campaign? The answer lies in Bharrat Jagdeo once again deciding to publicly engage in naked appeal to racial instincts and fear mongering. Make no mistake about it. Jagdeo did what Cheddi and Janet Jagan did at the bottom house meetings for decades in successfully holding their base. After Jagdeo started his race baiting and fear mongering, there was a noticeable turn out at PPP rallies across the country, so much so that I predicted on social media a very close election in which one seat would separate the winner and loser. Although the PPP lost the elections, Jagdeo’s use of racial fear mongering proved to be an effective tool in holding the core base of the PPP, although it must be noted that around 10% of Indo Guyanese voted for the Coalition while another 10% did not vote at all, thereby ensuring the defeat of the PPP. It must be noted too that had the AFC’s Moses Nagamootoo conducted a systematic and sustained campaign in PPP strongholds the Coalition would have won more Indo Guyanese support. I think too that had David Granger spent more time in Indo Guyanese communities he would have won over many PPP supporters. Racial fear mongering by the PPP will be the greatest obstacle to President Granger’s vision of national unity. In opposition the PPP will continue with this tool in order to hold its base and in this regard it will be assisted by the old PNCites who will try to intimidate and discriminate against innocent perceived PPP supporters. This will cause those Indo Guyanese who voted against the PPP to return to the base thereby increasing PPP support. The PPP will continue with its old tried and tested narratives of PNC hatred of Indo Guyanese. Already the rewarding of Hamilton Green with the Order of Roraima has caused much consternation amongst Indo Guyanese who don’t support the PPP so just imagine what were its effects on supporters of the PPP. At this point I must admit that the PNC also has its narratives and so we have the 2 main parties with their versions of our history. These narratives only serve to cement the racial divisions that were caused by Cheddi Jagan and Forbes Burnham in their struggle for personal power in the early 1960’s. Forty nine years after Independence, the cause for Jagan and Burnham’s power struggle, we are still a divided nation as was evidenced by the 2015 election results. The PPP is bent on racial divisons in order to hold its base. We have in President Granger a historian with a vision for racial unity. I think we all would like to see some concrete steps in that direction by the time we celebrate our 50th Independence Anniversary. One such step should be a Truth and Reconciliation Commission with the starting point being the year 1945 when WW2 ended and Britain was quite willing to part with her Colonies, the political situation in British Guiana, the introduction of Communist ideology by Cheddi and Janet Jagan, the Jagans siding with the USSR in the Cold War, universal suffrage and the 1953 elections, the suspension of the Constitution in 1953 and the split of the PPP in 1955 along mainly ideological lines that got blurred by racial support of the 2 leaders, the PPP’s cause of social unrest in the 1960’s due to its obsession with Communism, the Socialist drive of the PNC and the PPP up to 1985, elections rigging to keep out the Communist PPP, the anti PNC struggle by the African dominated WPA, the Hoyte era of 1985 to 1992 when he dismantled Socialism and returned to democracy, the PPP era of 1992 to 2015 of narco trafficking, money laundering, massive corruption, debauchery, and theft of public property. The findings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission would then become the bench mark by which the youths would gauge the narratives of the PPP and the PNC and so make informed decisions at elections time. It would serve as deterrence to the PPP’s racial fear mongering, return of Indo Guyanese historiography to that community, shatter the PPP’s mythologies of victimization, expose the PPP as the cause of social unrest in the 1960’s due to it placing the interest of Communism above that of Indo Guyanese and all of Guyana. Most importantly it could be used to educate the youth voters who could comprise the swing voters, who would not blindly support governments, who could force a change in our political culture, and who could change government at every election.
Even today, after the loss of the elections, the PPP, rather than placing the interests of Indo Guyanese and all Guyana above that of the Party’s, has refused President Granger’s offer to form a Government of National Unity and is bent to resorting to its old ways of racial divisiveness in order to hold its core base. A Truth and Reconciliation Commission is a necessary first step in defeating the PPP’s racial fear mongering and to start uniting our country.
Malcolm Harripaul