Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

MATURED POLITICS REQUIRES MATURED POLITICIANS

 
April 20, 2012 | By | Filed Under Features / Columnists, Peeping Tom 

Source - Kaieteur News

 

The view has long been expressed within this column that what was needed to reduce political tensions in Guyana and secure an environment that would allow for more rapid economic development was political maturity.


This was an absent ingredient since 1999 when Guyana had youthful leadership that wanted to do things all at once; wanted to do everything by itself and wanted to have its own way. Youthful leadership failed Guyana, and the country was fortunate that older heads have assumed control of the government and the main opposition partnership.


The view was also expressed in this column that given these circumstances, what Guyana needed was persons of chronological maturity within the leadership of the government and the opposition.


Guyana now has within its political leadership, matured persons who have shown what political maturity can achieve. Over the past few days, substantial political cooperation has been achieved between the government and the main opposition, A Partnership for National Unity (APNU).

 

Unfortunately, the Alliance for Change (AFC) blundered its way out of the process because of a misguided attempt at high drama and political theatrics.

 

Its wild and arrogant proposal of deep and arbitrary cuts to the Budget has backfired on the party which is now trying to retreat in order to save face.


On the other hand, APNU seized the opportunity to demonstrate the value of political cooperation and prevent a crisis in the country, which could have led to fresh elections.


The government was open to accommodation with the opposition, something that would never have happened had the government or APNU not been headed by matured political leaders.


There were many who, in the run-up to the elections, had expressed the view that Guyana was moving from a situation of relatively youthful leadership at the political level to one in which both of the leaders of the main political parties were in their mid-sixties.


But having experienced what young leadership did to this country, it was only fitting that the older generation be given the chance to show what it could do. It has been most helpful that the younger generation was not holding the leadership of the respective political parties, because this younger generation, particularly within the PPP, has not demonstrated an inclination towards reaching out to the opposition.


But now with political elders in the leadership of both the PPP and the main Opposition, a difference has been made. The agreements of the past few days could not have been reached under the Jagdeo presidency. It took matured and wiser heads to recognize that an agreement was necessary.


The situation was no doubt compounded by the quarrels between the opposition and the government over control of parliament. Yet these strong differences did not deter the two sides from reaching an agreement, remarkably in a matter of hours, on highly contentious issues.


And the reason why such significant progress has been made is because of the fact that we are dealing with matured individuals, old and wise heads. These men are not into building reputations or egos. Like the matured persons they are, they can see the bigger picture.


Both the president of Guyana and the Opposition Leader should be congratulated in taking Guyana past this very important hurdle. They will no doubt face criticism within their respective parties by detractors who do not wish to see political cooperation, including by the politically ambitious persons within both camps who would wish to see these leaders fail so that they can take over.


The leaders have, however, not given in to these detractors. They have met and reached agreement. There has been a give-and-take approach on both sides. Sense and reason has prevailed. The country has been spared being thrown into another election.


Both sides have gained from this process. The government has exercised its right to craft its own Budget and the opposition has exercised its will to wrest concessions from the government. The president and the leader of the opposition have demonstrated that they are more than capable of putting Guyana first. They were helped in the process by the fact that they are both big men. May they continue in their wise ways!

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Unfortunately, the Alliance for Change (AFC) blundered its way out of the process because of a misguided attempt at high drama and political theatrics.

 

Its wild and arrogant proposal of deep and arbitrary cuts to the Budget has backfired on the party which is now trying to retreat in order to save face.

 

 

Their intentions, actions and reality are becoming quite clearer.

FM

Both sides have gained from this process.

 

The government has exercised its right to craft its own Budget and the opposition has exercised its will to wrest concessions from the government.

 

The president and the leader of the opposition have demonstrated that they are more than capable of putting Guyana first.

 

They were helped in the process by the fact that they are both big men.

 

May they continue in their wise ways!

 

Perhaps, a start for the PROGRESSIVE elements of the PPPC and the PNC, to merge in possible 2013; -- 60 years after the unfortunate split which created the current PPP and the PNC as separate political parties.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Unfortunately, the Alliance for Change (AFC) blundered its way out of the process because of a misguided attempt at high drama and political theatrics.

 

Its wild and arrogant proposal of deep and arbitrary cuts to the Budget has backfired on the party which is now trying to retreat in order to save face.

 

 

Their intentions, actions and reality are becoming quite clearer.


Indeed! The PPP and APNC are in bed together.

 

Like an old fool, you were saying that AFC=PNC.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Unfortunately, the Alliance for Change (AFC) blundered its way out of the process because of a misguided attempt at high drama and political theatrics.

 

Its wild and arrogant proposal of deep and arbitrary cuts to the Budget has backfired on the party which is now trying to retreat in order to save face.

 

 

Their intentions, actions and reality are becoming quite clearer.


Indeed! The PPP and APNC are in bed together.

 

Like an old fool, you were saying that AFC=PNC.

Spin it whatever way you want but the AFC has lost credibility and lacks political maturity. I have been saying this all along.

 

The were outfoxed by their big brother PNC who realized that the budget was good for Guyana.

 

The AFC has become "what is bad for Guyana is good for the AFC" party and they need to change their leadership and stop selling snake oil and fabricate stories of imaginary theft. People are simply fed up with mud slinging politics in Guyana and want to see their country make progress.

 

AFC, the elections are over.

 

The AFC wheels are falling off very quickly and their party will fade away into the corentyne river. They blundered an opportunity to become the guardian of the people's interest in parliament.

 

Recent protests by workers against the AFC have destroyed them for good. Hot head RUMjattan and foul mouth Moses must step aside for more mature politicians in the AFC leadership circle.

 

In the end, it is better to see Moses on the sidelines than in the PPP because it is now certain that he rightly belongs to the political gutter. Is his action child abuse ? Will this type of behaviour be tolerated in Canadian parliament or US congress ?

 

As for RUMjattan, when will he blow a fuse next and destory the AFC for good ? Or is he close to a bottle these days ? Drowning in sorrow with his blunders ?

 

A pro AFC newspaper is praising the PPP and the PNC and dumping on the AFC. Very funny.

 

Stop calling people the "F" word (fool). I hope that admin is paying attention.

FM
Last edited by Former Member

If they are fools why can I not use the appropriate adjective?

 

I guess I can  be more broad minded and act liberally with the widest scope of  the English vernacular ie birdbrain, blockhead, bonehead, ass, dolt, dunderhead moron, twit, numbskull,   boob buffoon  clod,  dimwit, clown  , dumb ox, dunce, dunderhead, easy mark, fair game, fathead, goose, halfwit, imbecile, ignoramus moron ninny,lamebrain, lightweight, loon,  nincompoop, ninny, nitwit, numskull, simpleton oaf, twit, dope.

 

I honestly will take your advice.

FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:

The entire article is about maturity and working together for a common good for the people. Unfortunately, AFC can't understand the maturity involved by the two elders, therefore, they are feeling the heat from the people. When all is said and done I hope they can save their asses. 

If the "common good" of the people were per only as defined by the PPP you may have a point. Unfortunately, their claims to immaculate perception, notwithstanding,  the common good is a term only achieved in reality by consensus.

 

To see this clearer one can assume an individual knows what he would term the "common good" for himself but unfortunately that cannot be for everyone. That individual can be so peculiarly constituted as to prefer all manner of things that are indeed bad for him.

 

It is therefore necessary for us to collaborate on determining the common good. That is the way democracy works. We have a plurality of parties with interests and concerns for their constituents so what the PPP sees as the common good is contingent.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×