Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Tender Board ignores Public Works pricing recommendation

AUGUST 2, 2014 | BY  | FILED UNDER NEWS 

The National Procurement and Tender Administration Board continues to ignore recommendations to award public works contracts to the bidder whose bid is 15 percent above or below the engineer’s estimate.
This is according to an engineer of the Public Works Ministry, who said that, that is one of the reasons why so many projects are experiencing delays.
An Engineer’s Estimate is a detailed cost evaluation for a project. It is used by the contractor to determine how much material is needed to execute a project. An inaccurate estimate could affect the duration and cost of the project.
The engineer explained that the engineer’s estimate for foreign funded projects is determined by the international design consultant. And, for nationally funded projects the engineer’s estimate is prepared by engineers of the Ministry.
According to the engineer, the Ministry, which has a presence on the National Procurement and Tender Administration Board, has often recommended that the contractor’s bid should be above or under 15 percent of the Engineer’s Estimate.
“But, there are times when you have it varying by as much as 40 percent below the Engineer’s Estimate,” the engineer said.
He said that bidding is a competitive process with contractors trying to place the lowest possible bid to secure the jobs.
“There are so many contractors out there trying to secure jobs and some of them come in at very unrealistic rates just to secure the job…The problem is that, at the end of the day they cannot complete the job in a timely manner professionally, and engineers have to be on their backs to get quality,” he stated.
“If you are outside of the 15 percent bracket we don’t feel you would be able to complete the job. But at tender board we are having problems going ahead with that…We have recommended this,” the Engineer added.
However, the National Procurement and Tender Administration Board always say that the contractor with the lowest evaluated bid would be awarded the contract, even if it is 40 percent below the engineer’s Estimate. In addition, the Tender Board considers if the contractor is technically capable to execute the work.
“It’s one of the reasons why we are having a lot of projects delayed and you have to be on the contractor to do quality projects because they try to shortchange you,” he said.
According to the engineer, there are times when the Engineer’s Estimate is inaccurate with differences in quantities and results in the need for the procurement of additional materials. However, error in determining accurate fill materials needed for a road project could be explained, he said.
Giving an example, he said that while the contractor was installing wick drains and surcharge on the East Bank Demerara Public Road four-lane widening project it was realized, the quantity for the surcharge was inadequate. As such, that is currently being addressed.
The engineer said that if there are not enough funds available to cater for extra works, the Ministry would have to seek additional funding from Government to continue the project.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Finance Ministry continues to discriminate in ads placement

AUGUST 2, 2014 | BY  | FILED UNDER NEWS 

Kaieteur, Stabroek News sidelined, Guyana Times favoured

Government is continuing its practice of denying advertisements to private, independent media houses, opting instead for a Government-friendly newspaper with which it shares close ties.

Finance Minister, Dr. Ashni Singh

Finance Minister,
Dr. Ashni Singh

The latest case involves a Government of Guyana/Caribbean Development Bank- Basic Needs Trust Fund advertisement on July 20.
The advertisement for an Administrative Assistant was placed in the state-owned Guyana Chronicle and the Guyana Times, a newspaper that has close links to the Government but a poor circulation. It produces even less than the Guyana Chronicle and about one-eight of what Kaieteur News prints.
There was none in Kaieteur News or Stabroek News, the two privately-owned newspapers in Guyana with a larger circulation than either of those in which the government placed the advertisement.
It was only in May that a complaint was made to President of the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB), Dr. William Smith, and Finance Minister, Dr. Ashni Singh. Smith was here for the CDB’s 44th Annual General Meeting.
During a closing press conference, questions were posed to both officials on the advertising policies by the bank for its funded projects and whether taxpayers really had a fair opportunity to peruse them.
The Finance Minister at the time was unhappy that the question was raised at that forum, but promised to work along with media houses over issues with information and ads placement.
There has been no word from him since then.
Basic Needs, like the Ministry of Housing and Water and other Ministries, would continue to place ads in the Guyana Times, a newspaper owned by Dr. Ranjisinghi ‘Bobby’ Ramroop, a close friend of former President Bharrat Jagdeo, and whose company, New GPC, has been a controversial beneficiary of billions of dollars in drugs contracts for the hospitals. Basic Needs falls under the Ministry of Finance.
The recent advertisement would continue to indicate the scant regard that Government places on ensuring that value for money is received for state resources being spent.
During that press conference in May, the CDB President said he was not aware of the issue and could not comment.
CDB is a major multilateral funding agency for Guyana. It is involved in road and school building projects.
According to the Finance Minister, during that press conference, through the National Assembly, Government has been releasing contract documents often.  He made it clear that he is not involved in placing ads, but would be willing to refer the matter to the relevant department if a particular complaint was made.
Back then, Kaieteur News’ Publisher, Glenn Lall, said that the issue is disturbing.
“The issue is not about us getting ads. As a matter of fact, we have offered in the past to carry state ads for free, if it means that our taxpayers will have an opportunity to know how their monies are being spent. But you cannot hide it away where nobody can see. This cannot be value for money.”
The issue is not new, as the Jagdeo administration had removed state ads from both Kaieteur News and Stabroek News before restoring the advertisements in time for the launch of Guyana Times, a few years ago.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×