Originally Posted by Tar_K:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:
We have free but unfair elections.
Unfair seems to be entrenched in your mind.
I am quite fair even in my critique of the PPP.
In your Fantasyland.
Former Member
Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:
We have free but unfair elections.
Unfair seems to be entrenched in your mind.
I am quite fair even in my critique of the PPP.
In your Fantasyland.
We have demonstrable evidence who is in fantasy land...the one who screamed and shouted that 55% is the margin of the PPP victory. Do you remember that nut case?
Former Member
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:
We have free but unfair elections.
Unfair seems to be entrenched in your mind.
I am quite fair even in my critique of the PPP.
In your Fantasyland.
We have demonstrable evidence who is in fantasy land...the one who screamed and shouted that 55% is the margin of the PPP victory. Do you remember that nut case?
In actual fact Strom the man said PPP was going to get 60% 
.
Former Member
A prominent AFC supporter/member, active during the 2011 elections, clearly stated on GNI that the AFC will win more than fifty percent ( 50% ) of the votes and form the government.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
A prominent AFC supporter/member, active during the 2011 elections, clearly stated on GNI that the AFC will win more than fifty percent ( 50% ) of the votes and form the government.
The data is still on the site so you can tell us who this individual is without hints.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
A prominent AFC supporter/member, active during the 2011 elections, clearly stated on GNI that the AFC will win more than fifty percent ( 50% ) of the votes and form the government.
-----------
You are indeed in fantasy land. Who might that be? Prove it or hold thy senility.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
A prominent AFC supporter/member, active during the 2011 elections, clearly stated on GNI that the AFC will win more than fifty percent ( 50% ) of the votes and form the government.
The data is still on the site so you can tell us who this individual is without hints.
GNI's options to secure information, of which I am quite aware, is not the issue.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
A prominent AFC supporter/member, active during the 2011 elections, clearly stated on GNI that the AFC will win more than fifty percent ( 50% ) of the votes and form the government.
The data is still on the site so you can tell us who this individual is without hints.
GNI's options to secure information, of which I am quite aware, is not the issue.
The sentence does not make grammatical sense. Kindly rewrite so we can decipher your enormous wisdom.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
A prominent AFC supporter/member, active during the 2011 elections, clearly stated on GNI that the AFC will win more than fifty percent ( 50% ) of the votes and form the government.
The data is still on the site so you can tell us who this individual is without hints.
GNI's options to secure information, of which I am quite aware, is not the issue.
Who speaks of security? I am speaking to your prodigious knuckleheaded capacity for uttering all sorts of macabre things ceaselessly. To say you speak in riddles would be to admit to some coherency in your thoughts. But you have none. Most of what you say is distilled gibberish. It seems you work hard at being non informational!
Former Member
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
A prominent AFC supporter/member, active during the 2011 elections, clearly stated on GNI that the AFC will win more than fifty percent ( 50% ) of the votes and form the government.
The data is still on the site so you can tell us who this individual is without hints.
GNI's options to secure information, of which I am quite aware, is not the issue.
Who speaks of security? I am speaking to your prodigious knuckleheaded capacity for uttering all sorts of macabre things ceaselessly. To say you speak in riddles would be to admit to some coherency in your thoughts. But you have none. Most of what you say is distilled gibberish. It seems you work hard at being non informational!
-----
Well said Strom
Former Member
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
A prominent AFC supporter/member, active during the 2011 elections, clearly stated on GNI that the AFC will win more than fifty percent ( 50% ) of the votes and form the government.
The data is still on the site so you can tell us who this individual is without hints.
GNI's options to secure information, of which I am quite aware, is not the issue.
Who speaks of security? I am speaking to your prodigious knuckleheaded capacity for uttering all sorts of macabre things ceaselessly. To say you speak in riddles would be to admit to some coherency in your thoughts. But you have none. Most of what you say is distilled gibberish. It seems you work hard at being non informational!
Understanding basic issues seems to be your major continued challenges.
Expressing nonsense seems to be your best quality.
Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
A prominent AFC supporter/member, active during the 2011 elections, clearly stated on GNI that the AFC will win more than fifty percent ( 50% ) of the votes and form the government.
The data is still on the site so you can tell us who this individual is without hints.
GNI's options to secure information, of which I am quite aware, is not the issue.
Who speaks of security? I am speaking to your prodigious knuckleheaded capacity for uttering all sorts of macabre things ceaselessly. To say you speak in riddles would be to admit to some coherency in your thoughts. But you have none. Most of what you say is distilled gibberish. It seems you work hard at being non informational!
Understanding basic issues seems to be your major continued challenges.
Expressing nonsense seems to be your best quality.
------
LOL
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
708 online (0 members
/
708 guests)