Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Natural Resources Fund to be reformed for greater transparency – Jagdeo

https://i2.wp.com/www.inewsguyana.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Jagdeo.jpg?w=649&ssl=1Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo

The People’s Progressive Party (PPP) Government remains committed to reforming the Natural Resources Fund Act to ensure greater transparency in managing the fund. This is according to Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo.

According to Jagdeo, the PPP has always been critical of the fund even in Opposition because the former A Partnership for National Unity/Alliance For Change (APNU/AFC) used a model to create the fund that would not ensure the political impudence of the fund.

“In Opposition, we were very critical of the current Natural Resource Fund. Because it was passed in the Parliament after the No-Confidence Motion, without any input from any political party. The reason we were critical was we did not believe the model was arm’s length enough in terms of management.”

“So, we have all been in favour of one principle in the fund. That the fund must be managed in a professional manner, in an arm’s length way from political interference. We’re committed to that principle and the Santiago Principles in terms of transparency when using the fund,” Jagdeo said.

Jagdeo further reminded that it was the former PPP Government that signed Guyana up to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Therefore, he noted that the Government remains committed to transparency in using the fund.

“We’ve also made further commitments, when the previous Government collected the signing bonus and they did not tell the country for a year and a half. We made it clear that we will criminalise the non-disclosure of receipts from the oil companies.”

“So, if the Minister of Finance does not publish in the official gazette and notify the National Assembly, three to six months after the receipt of any funds from any oil company, then the Minister of Finance and maybe the secretary to the treasury will go to jail. So, at the end of the year, any Guyanese can get the official gazettes and add the sum collected from oil companies.”

Reformed

Meanwhile, Finance Minister Dr Ashni Singh also explained that money from the oil and gas sector that is banked in the fund cannot be actively invested with the fund in its current state. For now, the fund will passively accrue interest from the United States (US) Federal Reserve where it is currently banked.

https://i0.wp.com/www.inewsguyana.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/50994657812_81f8f4b406_k.jpg?resize=696%2C464&ssl=1

Minister of Finance Dr Ashni Singh

“We came into Government with a natural resources fund that was already in existence. And in fact, it was set up by a law that was passed after the No-Confidence Motion had been approved. It was approved in December of 2018. The Natural Resource Fund Act was passed in 2019, with no Opposition involvement or input. The fund in its current configuration is not actively invested.”

“As you know, it’s our intention to reform the fund and its management. In due course we’ll be going to Parliament to address some of the deficiencies in the current arrangement. And at that point of time, we will consider an active investment strategy for the fund, a prudent but active investment strategy. But at this point the fund is not actively invested,” Singh said.

It was previously disclosed in February of this year that over US$200 million earned in oil revenues is currently in Guyana’s Natural Resource Fund, with the latest payment made in January this year.

It is expected that once the Natural Resource Fund Act, which stipulates that various committees must be established to provide oversight for the fund, is reviewed, it will be brought to the National Assembly by the current Government.

In keeping with its manifesto commitments, the Government has pledged to implement a number of measures to ensure accountable and transparent management of the country’s natural resources including establishing an arm’s length sovereign wealth fund insulated from political interference and upholding the Santiago Principles of transparency and accountability, and the EITI.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Asked specifically if the PPP/C government plans to use the Norway model to manage oil revenues both men said that Guyana situation is very different from Norway. “There is a lot of academic debate on different funds and different ways in which Natural Resources Funds are managed globally but what a lot of academic debate don’t tell you is that for example in the Norwegian model it was adopted after the country had a certain level of infrastructure, a certain level of service, a certain level of development,” Ali noted.

He stressed that in considering the best model to implement, discussions must include the state of the country when a particular model was approved. His government, he noted, is currently examining several models, including the Kazakhstan model.

This model prioritises the dual purposes of economic stabilisation and savings. Notably while the National Bank of Kazakhstan serves as operational manager for the fund, all major strategic and policy decisions regarding the fund are made by the management council, consisting of the President, Prime Minister and high-ranking ministers, government officials and parliamentarians.

https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/g...0#672785579180647450

Kazastan

Them bhias looking at the above.

Django
@Django posted:

Asked specifically if the PPP/C government plans to use the Norway model to manage oil revenues both men said that Guyana situation is very different from Norway. “There is a lot of academic debate on different funds and different ways in which Natural Resources Funds are managed globally but what a lot of academic debate don’t tell you is that for example in the Norwegian model it was adopted after the country had a certain level of infrastructure, a certain level of service, a certain level of development,” Ali noted.

He stressed that in considering the best model to implement, discussions must include the state of the country when a particular model was approved. His government, he noted, is currently examining several models, including the Kazakhstan model.

This model prioritises the dual purposes of economic stabilisation and savings. Notably while the National Bank of Kazakhstan serves as operational manager for the fund, all major strategic and policy decisions regarding the fund are made by the management council, consisting of the President, Prime Minister and high-ranking ministers, government officials and parliamentarians.

https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/g...0#672785579180647450

Kazastan

Them bhias looking at the above.

Yeh! Wid Jag, naow yuh see hit, naow yuh doant! Wuz transpurent, nuh? Fer a wile, ennyway!

FM

What transparency is this liar talking about? The problem for the PPP is that the layers of  bureaucracy that is currently in place to bring transparency to spending from the NRF is too troublesome for them - thanks to the Coalition. That's the reason they haven't yet established the various Committees that are required to provide scrutiny on the withdrawing of funds from the NRF. Her's the problem, the Committees enjoy cross-party membership. The PPP wants to simply remove this to do as they please.....and we all know what that means.

For the naysayers - show me one thing that the PPP has been transparent about since they took office, please!

None of the deals they signed with Exxon had been released to the public. They get round the procurement system by categorizing things as emergencies so they can sigh-off on huge contracts that no one can see. And what about the agreements they sighed with Pompeo? We're still in the dark on what happened there.

Transparency my foot!

S
@cain posted:

It begins with the ..ahem.."transparency".. of Irfart's papers.

The more I think about Irfaan's scam about his academic qualifications the more I wonder how/why the Coalition and the press have allowed him to get away with it.  It should be relatively easy to establish the fraud.  I have established it for myself.  The Coalition and press should have been asking questions at UWI.  How is it that a person who didn't attend classes there get an "earned" doctorate?  Who engineered the fraud?  Is that person now working in the Min. of Education?  Who was Ali's supervisor? His committee? When did he defend his thesis?  Was there an external examiner?  What was the title of his thesis?  Did he write it?  Is he familiar with its contents? Did he sit/pass comprenhensive exams?  The list goes on and on.  Why is the press not investigating what happened?  Now a fraudster is the president. Is this what young Guyanese should aspire to?

T
@Ramakant-P posted:

Can't you speak plain English? Jagdeo tells it as it is.

Mih nah foursin yuh fuh reed, kunt! We awl tel um az wee see um!  Butt ah doant see de saim az teefman! Unlyke yu!

FM
Last edited by Former Member
@Django posted:

Lawsuit-for-disclosure-of-irfaan-alis-academic-qualifications-likely-to-be-aborted

https://www.stabroeknews.com/2...ikely-to-be-aborted/

Tota ,check out the article.

I don't think going to court was the appropriate route.  Many people know the history of Ali's bogus qualifications and how/why that bogus certificate was printed by the non-existent outfit.  What happened at UWI is not as clear.  As Athena mentioned, UWI has a good reputation but the Ali matter raises serious questions about fraud.  With the resources and connections at its disposal the Coalition could easily get to the bottom of the matter.  Moreover, the press clearly has not done its job in exposing the fraud. I know that individuals have been asking the Principal at St. Augustine about this matter and he has been evasive but the press would be more effective in getting answers.

T

There must be honour among.thieves or haow dis teefin ting gun wuk, eh? Yu gat seecrutz, eye gat seecrutz! Leh wee kuperate! Wee iz fu, dem iz menny! Leh wee go.fuh de munee! Iz yu tun!

FM
@Totaram posted:

I don't think going to court was the appropriate route.  Many people know the history of Ali's bogus qualifications and how/why that bogus certificate was printed by the non-existent outfit.  What happened at UWI is not as clear.  As Athena mentioned, UWI has a good reputation but the Ali matter raises serious questions about fraud.  With the resources and connections at its disposal the Coalition could easily get to the bottom of the matter.  Moreover, the press clearly has not done its job in exposing the fraud. I know that individuals have been asking the Principal at St. Augustine about this matter and he has been evasive but the press would be more effective in getting answers.

The link to Ali 's Phd

https://sta.uwi.edu/eng/dr-jacob-opadeyi

https://www.stabroeknews.com/2...ized-field-of-study/

Django

If 'the coalition could easily get to the bottom of the matter' as Tota claims, why doesn't it? Maybe there's no truth to these claims, only wishful.thinking and alcoholic dreams, jango! Your links didn't help! Though I read an interesting letter to SN about 2 Police elections! Corruption and trouble ahead!

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×