NDCs called meetings despite Court Order

The Court overstepped its jurisdiction in passing a judgment contrary to what is written in the constitution. The judge should be fired for incompetence.

Mr.T posted:

The Court overstepped its jurisdiction in passing a judgment contrary to what is written in the constitution. The judge should be fired for incompetence.

HEHEHE  Brain Dead idiot is the new Judge in town!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Judge's decision is consistent with the Laws of Guyana, the full section of which was published on a related article on this item.

This decision can only be rescinded/overturned by another Court ruling.

Mr.T posted:

The Court overstepped its jurisdiction in passing a judgment contrary to what is written in the constitution. The judge should be fired for incompetence.

If the judge misinterpreted the Constitution why is there no appeal of her judgement. Until a higher court rules otherwise her judgement stands.  Again the cancer of your racist and incompetent behaviour has spread all over your brain. 

Demerara_Guy posted:

The Judge's decision is consistent with the Laws of Guyana, the full section of which was published on a related article on this item.

This decision can only be rescinded/overturned by another Court ruling.

Agreed. They can keep their meeting in violation of the judgement, however, any decisions arising from those meetings would be deemed invalid.

Mr.T posted:

The Court overstepped its jurisdiction in passing a judgment contrary to what is written in the constitution. The judge should be fired for incompetence.

Knucklehead, the Court overstepped its jurisdiction, and now according to you the judge should be fired for incompetence? What kind of logic is this? Did you read the Constitution? 

You already saying that this was a PPP judge, so the ruling must be ignored.

 When are you guys going to criticize the coalition for wrongdoing?

Ow Buddy, Al yuh go easy on SHIT HEAD!!!!!

Guyana is now a Dictatorship in the Making. Massive Rigging is next.

All this is happening right under the Noses of Ramjattan and Moses.

Ramjattan got katahar from the PNC when he protested seat allocations in favour of the PNC at the recently held Local Elections.

Watch the dictatorship flourish under Granger and Harmon.

The PPP ignored the Judge ruling on the Budget and went on to spend 4 billion dollars, fund GINA etc.

Well, I do not agree with this disobeying of the rules. The APNU should request an expedited appeal through the courts. The PPP should stand with them if indeed they care about the law. After all, this is about communities not parties.

You were one of them saying $1 was good enough to run GINA and GINA must not be Govt owned. Do you simply hang your mouth where the soup is leaking??????????????????

Nehru posted:

You were one of them saying $1 was good enough to run GINA and GINA must not be Govt owned. Do you simply hang your mouth where the soup is leaking??????????????????

They already had lots of funds given they were funding New Media which evolved Into Robert Persaud's sister's media empire.

I do not consort with party honchos. You do or at lease you say you do. Were you not bragging about using the Guyanese people visa? You are dumb as a skunk.

VishMahabir posted:

Mr.T posted:

The Court overstepped its jurisdiction in passing a judgment contrary to what is written in the constitution. The judge should be fired for incompetence.

Knucklehead, the Court overstepped its jurisdiction, and now according to you the judge should be fired for incompetence?

Antiman, if you don't now the constitution, go read it.

It will be useless to ask you to read the constitution and the relevant legislation regarding a tie for seats. The relevant legislation indicates that both Williams and Bulkan are incorrect in their interpretation. In fact, there were ties in 1994. If they think that the court is incorrect, they should appeal the decision instead of acting as if there is no rule of law, that they can act outside of the law. Shades of PNC days when the laws were there for window dressing. We need something better than what is happening with this.

There were ties with regards to selecting the people at the top. There was no tie in the regional election itself. So the court ruling to run elections again is not within the constitution.

Please have someone read the municipal and district council act for you and explain it to you. The court is not ruling is that the government's action is in contravention of the act which clearly states what must happen if there is a tie for the position of chairman of the council.

if the government is so certain that thy are correct, why are they not appealing the decision to the court. Is it because they know that they do not have a legal on which to stand? Or is it because they think they can flaunt their illegality without legal penalties?