Skip to main content

FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

There are apt approaches to change laws.

 

There are indeed those who approach the changes from adversarial angles, and it is their choices to accept the consequences for their actions.

There are only adversarial modes with respect to the obdurate and recalcitrant. In such modes the objective is always to win against all odds so consequences are incidental

Obdurate and recalcitrant ones are indeed one's perspective, but they are not necessarily a circumspect view on the issues and situation.

I am sure you have our clauses mixed up but if that is your intent then indeed the PPP are not circumspect.

Your perspective is always to portray the PPP as not circumspect.

FM
Add Reaction
ðŸ’ŊâĪïļðŸ˜‚🎉🙏ðŸĪ”😀ðŸ˜đ👍👎☝ïļðŸ‘ðŸ˜ŧ👀ðŸ‘ŋðŸ˜ĒðŸĪŠðŸĪĢ✅🙄ðŸĪ·ðŸ”Ĩ🏆📈ðŸĪŊ
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

There are apt approaches to change laws.

 

There are indeed those who approach the changes from adversarial angles, and it is their choices to accept the consequences for their actions.

There are only adversarial modes with respect to the obdurate and recalcitrant. In such modes the objective is always to win against all odds so consequences are incidental

Obdurate and recalcitrant ones are indeed one's perspective, but they are not necessarily a circumspect view on the issues and situation.

I am sure you have our clauses mixed up but if that is your intent then indeed the PPP are not circumspect.

Your perspective is always to portray the PPP as not circumspect.

It is not merely uninformed perspective. It is driven by their persisting corrupt behavior. In this case it is a refusal to present to the assembly the details of a company that controls the nations assets. It so happens these assets always seem to end up in the hands of friends and family of the Party.

FM
Add Reaction
ðŸ’ŊâĪïļðŸ˜‚🎉🙏ðŸĪ”😀ðŸ˜đ👍👎☝ïļðŸ‘ðŸ˜ŧ👀ðŸ‘ŋðŸ˜ĒðŸĪŠðŸĪĢ✅🙄ðŸĪ·ðŸ”Ĩ🏆📈ðŸĪŊ
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

There are apt approaches to change laws.

 

There are indeed those who approach the changes from adversarial angles, and it is their choices to accept the consequences for their actions.

There are only adversarial modes with respect to the obdurate and recalcitrant. In such modes the objective is always to win against all odds so consequences are incidental

Obdurate and recalcitrant ones are indeed one's perspective, but they are not necessarily a circumspect view on the issues and situation.

I am sure you have our clauses mixed up but if that is your intent then indeed the PPP are not circumspect.

Your perspective is always to portray the PPP as not circumspect.

It is not merely uninformed perspective. It is driven by their persisting corrupt behavior. In this case it is a refusal to present to the assembly the details of a company that controls the nations assets. It so happens these assets always seem to end up in the hands of friends and family of the Party.

Your personal views on uninformed perspective which can be accepted within its context, but it does not reflect the reality of the situation.

FM
Add Reaction
ðŸ’ŊâĪïļðŸ˜‚🎉🙏ðŸĪ”😀ðŸ˜đ👍👎☝ïļðŸ‘ðŸ˜ŧ👀ðŸ‘ŋðŸ˜ĒðŸĪŠðŸĪĢ✅🙄ðŸĪ·ðŸ”Ĩ🏆📈ðŸĪŊ
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

There are apt approaches to change laws.

 

There are indeed those who approach the changes from adversarial angles, and it is their choices to accept the consequences for their actions.

There are only adversarial modes with respect to the obdurate and recalcitrant. In such modes the objective is always to win against all odds so consequences are incidental

Obdurate and recalcitrant ones are indeed one's perspective, but they are not necessarily a circumspect view on the issues and situation.

I am sure you have our clauses mixed up but if that is your intent then indeed the PPP are not circumspect.

Your perspective is always to portray the PPP as not circumspect.

It is not merely uninformed perspective. It is driven by their persisting corrupt behavior. In this case it is a refusal to present to the assembly the details of a company that controls the nations assets. It so happens these assets always seem to end up in the hands of friends and family of the Party.

Your personal views on uninformed perspective which can be accepted within its context, but it does not reflect the reality of the situation.

My personal views happen to coincide with those representing the majority hence they ask the PPP to account. Your reality is the delusion percolating in your head.

FM
Add Reaction
ðŸ’ŊâĪïļðŸ˜‚🎉🙏ðŸĪ”😀ðŸ˜đ👍👎☝ïļðŸ‘ðŸ˜ŧ👀ðŸ‘ŋðŸ˜ĒðŸĪŠðŸĪĢ✅🙄ðŸĪ·ðŸ”Ĩ🏆📈ðŸĪŊ
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

There are apt approaches to change laws.

 

There are indeed those who approach the changes from adversarial angles, and it is their choices to accept the consequences for their actions.

There are only adversarial modes with respect to the obdurate and recalcitrant. In such modes the objective is always to win against all odds so consequences are incidental

Obdurate and recalcitrant ones are indeed one's perspective, but they are not necessarily a circumspect view on the issues and situation.

I am sure you have our clauses mixed up but if that is your intent then indeed the PPP are not circumspect.

Your perspective is always to portray the PPP as not circumspect.

It is not merely uninformed perspective. It is driven by their persisting corrupt behavior. In this case it is a refusal to present to the assembly the details of a company that controls the nations assets. It so happens these assets always seem to end up in the hands of friends and family of the Party.

Your personal views on uninformed perspective which can be accepted within its context, but it does not reflect the reality of the situation.

My personal views happen to coincide with those representing the majority hence they ask the PPP to account. Your reality is the delusion percolating in your head.

Your usual expressions to sate your egocentric and egotistical passions.

FM
Add Reaction
ðŸ’ŊâĪïļðŸ˜‚🎉🙏ðŸĪ”😀ðŸ˜đ👍👎☝ïļðŸ‘ðŸ˜ŧ👀ðŸ‘ŋðŸ˜ĒðŸĪŠðŸĪĢ✅🙄ðŸĪ·ðŸ”Ĩ🏆📈ðŸĪŊ
sachin_05sachin_05Senior Member
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by cain:
Originally Posted by Kari:

Let's see "PNC cum AFC" - I'm trying to wrap my head around the meaning of that phrase. How is the Latin "cum" used here Mr. Malaprop?

It probly got something to do wit a very simple word "shot"

you mean like 1 shot of Kwame's cum.

There is a bar here in town where this guy pop some Viagra and die on a Santo Dominican prostitute, now the advertise their special is "you can come and go" at the same time....

sachin_05
Last edited by sachin_05
Add Reaction
ðŸ’ŊâĪïļðŸ˜‚🎉🙏ðŸĪ”😀ðŸ˜đ👍👎☝ïļðŸ‘ðŸ˜ŧ👀ðŸ‘ŋðŸ˜ĒðŸĪŠðŸĪĢ✅🙄ðŸĪ·ðŸ”Ĩ🏆📈ðŸĪŊ
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

There are apt approaches to change laws.

 

There are indeed those who approach the changes from adversarial angles, and it is their choices to accept the consequences for their actions.

There are only adversarial modes with respect to the obdurate and recalcitrant. In such modes the objective is always to win against all odds so consequences are incidental

Obdurate and recalcitrant ones are indeed one's perspective, but they are not necessarily a circumspect view on the issues and situation.

I am sure you have our clauses mixed up but if that is your intent then indeed the PPP are not circumspect.

Your perspective is always to portray the PPP as not circumspect.

It is not merely uninformed perspective. It is driven by their persisting corrupt behavior. In this case it is a refusal to present to the assembly the details of a company that controls the nations assets. It so happens these assets always seem to end up in the hands of friends and family of the Party.

Your personal views on uninformed perspective which can be accepted within its context, but it does not reflect the reality of the situation.

My personal views happen to coincide with those representing the majority hence they ask the PPP to account. Your reality is the delusion percolating in your head.

Your usual expressions to sate your egocentric and egotistical passions.

So you end where you start...

FM
Add Reaction
ðŸ’ŊâĪïļðŸ˜‚🎉🙏ðŸĪ”😀ðŸ˜đ👍👎☝ïļðŸ‘ðŸ˜ŧ👀ðŸ‘ŋðŸ˜ĒðŸĪŠðŸĪĢ✅🙄ðŸĪ·ðŸ”Ĩ🏆📈ðŸĪŊ
FM Former Member
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Danyael:
It is not merely uninformed perspective. It is driven by their persisting corrupt behavior. In this case it is a refusal to present to the assembly the details of a company that controls the nations assets. It so happens these assets always seem to end up in the hands of friends and family of the Party.

Your personal views on uninformed perspective which can be accepted within its context, but it does not reflect the reality of the situation.

My personal views happen to coincide with those representing the majority hence they ask the PPP to account. Your reality is the delusion percolating in your head.

Your usual expressions to sate your egocentric and egotistical passions.

So you end where you start...

Exactly at the point where you were bellowing nonsense and I brought it to your attention.

FM
Add Reaction
ðŸ’ŊâĪïļðŸ˜‚🎉🙏ðŸĪ”😀ðŸ˜đ👍👎☝ïļðŸ‘ðŸ˜ŧ👀ðŸ‘ŋðŸ˜ĒðŸĪŠðŸĪĢ✅🙄ðŸĪ·ðŸ”Ĩ🏆📈ðŸĪŊ
Previous

Add Reply

Views: 1,261

Membership Required

We're sorry. You must be signed in to continue. Sign In or Register
×
Are you sure you want to remove from your Block List?
×
Loading...
×
When you block a person, they can no longer invite you to a private message or post to your profile wall. Replies and comments they make will be collapsed/hidden by default. Finally, you'll never receive email notifications about content they create or likes they designate for your content.
Note: if you proceed, you will no longer be following .
×
Welcome to the Original Guyanese Discussion Forums, first established in 1996. Here you can discuss, ask questions or generally debate anything related to politics, movies, music, health or just gyaff away your day/night here. A note of warning, the Political forum is not for the faint of heart.  We do have some rules, so please adhere to them .
 
Privacy Statement - Rules

 
 

 

×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×

Access to this requires a premium membership.

GNI VIP Member

Welcome to the Original Guyanese Discussion Forums, first established in 1996. Here you can discuss, ask questions or generally debate anything related to politics, movies, music, health or just gyaff away your day/night here.

Please note while you do have free access to our Forums, the Political Forum will now be a Paid Membership Forum. What does this mean? To write in the Political Forum you must be a paying member. The fee is $25.00 US per year and is non refundable. Payment can be done through PayPal.
Membership is not automatically renewed and you can cancel anytime
We do have some rules, so please adhere to them.
$25.00 per 12 Months (plus tax if applicable)
×