Skip to main content

President David Granger
President David Granger

No give away! Granger assures Guyana will not cede territory to Venezuela

 

“GUYANA will not sell out or “give away” any part of its territory to Venezuela or Suriname, President David Granger said yesterday as he addressed troops following a week-long simulation exercise (Exercise Greenheart) in jungle warfare at Bartica, Region Seven (Cuyuni–Mazaruni).“We cannot sell out; we cannot give away; we cannot offer the adversary any corridor, any passage,” President Granger stated emphatically, in obvious reference to Opposition Leader, Bharrat Jagdeo’s recent statement that the PPP had considered ceding maritime territory to placate Venezuela.
Jagdeo, a former president, told members of the media at a recent press conference that his administration had been exploring the option of negotiating a settlement with Venezuela that would have seen that country being given a channel out to the sea.
His exact words were: “Well, we gather that there are several other options available to the (UN) Secretary- General. I don’t want to say much about the options, but let me say…I am in a very difficult position, but there were other options that involve a negotiated settlement… Negotiated settlement which did not see any land concession that the 1899 Award would remain intact, but there was one view that you could probably, on the maritime area, give Venezuela a channel out to the sea.”
Asked whether he was suggesting that a part of the Essequibo be given to Venezuela, Jagdeo replied, “Not the Essequibo River; Orinoco, just on the border. Not our Essequibo; I didn’t mean that.”
But President Granger told soldiers yesterday, “We have an obligation to hand over to our children and grand-children the country that we inherited from our parents and grandparents.”
He said Guyana is not afraid of any threat to its territorial sovereignty, and that granted that gunboats have been placed in Guyana’s waters, it is the role of the GDF “to guarantee the people of our country that they’d be safe of any aggression.”
BE NOT TROUBLED
“So, GDF, be not troubled by the gun boats; you stay firm! And we the people of Guyana will be behind you; we the Government of Guyana will be in front of you; we will always be proud of diplomats, of diplomacy to ensure that peace is maintained!” he said as he assured the residents of Bartica that he would continue his pursuit of a peaceful resolution to the two border controversies.
He would continue to have meetings with UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, members of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR), the Organisation of American States (OAS), and the Commonwealth, the president said, adding that he would also continue to communicate with any agency that was committed to the peaceful resolution of the controversies. “At all costs,” he said, “Guyana’s territorial integrity must be preserved.”
With reference to the just-concluded seven-day manoeuvre, code-named Exercise Greenheart, President Granger said it was not an “offensive operation” but rather a “defensive operation”.
“Exercise Greenheart is about defending your territory,” he said. “You are defensive, not aggressive; you are protective, not offensive; you are positive, you are not negative. We want peace, and this is the best demonstration of our desire for peace.”
The Commander-in-Chief told ranks that exercises such as the one just concluded are a demonstration of our resolve as a people.
“It is a demonstration of our determination; it is a demonstration that we will not allow our destiny to be impaired or compromised by anybody,” he said.
“We in Guyana have no choice but to defend our territory, and protect our property. We have never sent a gun boat into the waters of a neighbouring state and we never will and we don’t want any neighbouring state to commit the act of aggression against us,” he added.
The former army commander said it is important that army officers remain fit, and that even though Guyana is celebrating its 50th Anniversary next month, “It doesn’t mean you must behave like a 50-year-old. You must behave like a 15-year-old; you must be fit and active.”
LOOK TO HISTORY
He also urged troops to remember their history; that back in 1966, some 49 years ago, Venezuela drew first blood when its troops occupied Ankoko Island. “So, as I speak at this very moment, Venezuelan armed national forces are still in occupation of Guyanese territory. The GDF is the only organisation that stands between the adversary and the people of Guyana,” President Granger said, adding:
“And as far as Venezuela is concerned, what they are claiming is that the award of 1899, which gave them 15,000 square km of land, is invalid.”

His argument is, “If it is invalid, give us back the 15,000 square kilometers; let’s start over again. But if you want to hold on to the land that was defined for us in 1899, we will hold on to the land that was defined for us in 1899.”
He urged the soldiers to protect Guyana’s territorial sovereignty so that their children and grandchildren could benefit from the country inherited by their forefathers.
Turning to the Suriname border controversy, President Granger said that that country had laid claim to the New River Triangle and passed a resolution in its National Assembly that renamed the New River Triangle, Corentyne. The move to rename it sees Suriname claiming all the land between the New River Triangle and the ‘real Corentyne’.
“We cannot accept a municipal decision; we will only accept the ruling of a tribunal. And as far as we are concerned, the Corentyne River has not changed in the last 100/200 years,” the President added.
By Ariana Gordon

 

http://guyanachronicle.com/no-...ritory-to-venezuela/

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Not picking sides. Confrontational rhetoric doan help in the solution. Just take Syria, all those people running away from their country all because, their own people choose war. Without considerations for the sufferings.

 

Guyana is Amerindian lands. Where are the considerations for the Amerindian?

S

Guyana needs to keep options in quiver – Jagdeo

Opposition Leader Bharrat Jagdeo

Opposition Leader Bharrat Jagdeo

Guyana-Venezuela border controversy

…Opposition should be engaged formally in process

Before embarking on a very significant trip to Essequibo following a Venezuelan diplomatic blitzkrieg through Caricom in an economic-directed move to gain support for its position on the border controversy with this country it had precipitated 50-odd years ago, former President and now Opposition Leader Bharrat Jagdeo reiterated his Party’s support of the Government’s rejection of the Venezuelan revanchist claims, but emphasised that support should be formalised in the Border Committee President David Granger had proposed when the two met over a month ago.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

He also strongly cautioned that Guyana must explore all options that did not involve relinquishing any land even while it pursued a juridical option for a full and final settlement on Venezuela’s claim that the “full and final” 1899 Arbitral Award was “null and void”.

At a press conference at the People’s Progressive Party’s headquarters on Robb Street, the former President said, “We thought we would move forward in a structured way. I have made it quite clear in the first meeting (between myself and President Granger), we would be a participant, an active participant of the Border Committee. We would like that Committee to be put in place so that a lot of these issues can be ventilated in those circles or in the Committee itself. So, I want to urge the President to put the Border Committee in place, to operationalise it.”

President David Granger

President David Granger

The former President, with 12 years’ experience under his belt at the helm of the country, proceeded in a “Socratic question and answer” manner to suggest the framework within which the country should analyse its options. Unfortunately, neither the reports emanating from the press conference nor the gloss given by one commentator supplied the answers to the questions that would have made the discourse intelligible.

Jagdeo began by asking, “We have declared that we want a juridical settlement. Is that part of the menu available to the Secretary General under the [United Nations] Charter?” The answer was “yes” since Jagdeo, of course, knew that this was one of the options in Article 33 of the UN Charter that the Geneva Convention mandates as the mechanism for settling the controversy.

Anticipating that answer, the President continued: “Will the UN be prepared to recommend that to Venezuela as part of the settlement?” The answer to this question is subtle for it assumes the listener understands that while the UN Secretary General can “recommend” an option to go forward, both parties to the controversy have to agree. Up to now, Venezuela has been adamant in rejecting the juridical route and based on experience in diplomatic intermediation, it was unlikely that the Secretary General would want the matter to reach a dead-end impasse. More likely he would want to keep the process “in play”.

Within this context, Jagdeo’s next question suggests the dilemma Guyana faces if the Secretary General is given no room for diplomatic manoeuvre: “If it is not part of the menu available to the Secretary General under the Charter(via Venezuela’s veto) , does this mean we will have to go it alone and lose UN’s involvement in the process?”

And Guyanese are led to facing the stark consequences of Guyana going it alone against Venezuela without the UN’s wider perspective of protecting smaller states against the depredations of larger states. The “depredations” are not confined to military force, but include economic and diplomatic initiatives as illustrated by Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s sweep from Suriname to St Lucia.

On this crucial issue, Jagdeo concluded, “So these are some issues that we could have raised privately, but as I said before, we have not been able to do so in the absence of the Border Committee.”

Options

Illustrating what he meant by having “options that do not involve Guyana giving up any land” while offering Venezuela something it may want, Jagdeo elaborated that the PPP/Civic while in office had internally explored as one of five options, the possibility of giving Venezuela access to the Atlantic Ocean offshore Guyana, without giving up any of the land territory or compromising the 1899 Tribunal Award, as part of a deal to settle the long-running border controversy. However, these options were never presented to the Venezuelans.

“There were other options that involved a negotiated settlement which did not see any land concession, that the 1899 Award would remain intact, that there was one view that you could probably on the maritime area give Venezuela a channel out to sea so you make a slight concession on the maritime area but make sure that you do not concede any territory that is land-based because the maritime boundaries still are yet to be determined,” he said.

Jagdeo emphasised that since Guyana was still in the process of demarcating its maritime borders and the channel to the Atlantic would in any case be from the mouth of its Orinoco, the result would be inconsequential to us but significant to the Venezuelans.

As has been pointed out by President Granger in his report on the border controversy to Parliament, President Carlos Andres Perez had once proposed a settlement based on such a passage to the Atlantic (salida al Atlantico).

Furthermore, as reported in June by PPP General Secretary Clement Rohee, Forbes Burnham had actually made an offer to the Venezuelans: “Rashleigh Jackson had one time suggested to his Venezuelan counterpart Zambrano Velasco that Guyana might be disposed to provide Venezuela with an ‘outlet to the Atlantic’, but he was rebuffed:”The idea of granting the passage of Venezuelan transport vessels… is not a proposal that might interest Venezuela. Venezuela aspires to an outlet to the Atlantic free from all foreign control and over which Venezuela exercises full sovereignty.” was Zambrano’s reply.”

Again, the point that the former President was making is that in diplomacy a country must always be prepared to have several options in its quiver that would still allow the country’s interests to be protected.

Django

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×