Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

No more discussions if President prorogues Parliament – Opposition Leader

November 10, 2014 | By | Filed Under News 

Opposition Leader, Brigadier (retired) David Granger said that he has exhausted all discussions with Head of State Donald Ramotar, and there will be no more talks if the country’s leader decides to prorogue the National Assembly amidst the pending No Confidence Motion hanging over his Administration’s head.

Opposition leader David Granger and President Donald Ramotar

Opposition leader David Granger and President Donald Ramotar

The A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) leader was at the time responding to reporters following the annual Remembrance Sunday observance ceremony held at the Cenotaph outside the Bank of Guyana yesterday.
President Ramotar announced last Tuesday evening that should the Opposition parties go ahead on the planned No Confidence Motion forwarded by the Alliance for Change (AFC), he will Prorogue or dissolve Parliament. The nation’s leader was adamant that there are more important issues that the combined opposition should be focusing on rather than bring a No Confidence Motion against the government, when the National Assembly reconvenes today.
The APNU and AFC have registered dissatisfaction at the manner in which the President is seeking to address the No Confidence Motion.
Granger told the media that the President has taken a line which he believes is “undemocratic and uncalled for.” He posited that the Parliament is “the place for rational debate to take place…if he (President) shuts it down, he shuts down debate, he must bear the consequences of that decision.”
If the President dissolves Parliament, a date will be set for national polls within three months. If he prorogues the Assembly, all Parliamentary sittings will cease and the government can govern for six months without any sittings.
Granger has noted however, that the Opposition, “can’t engage (the Administration) with a gun at our heads. This National Assembly is the forum for national debate. It is the voice of the people. I can’t see how he (President) can prorogue the parliament and expect us to have any discussion under duress. The place for discussions is the National Assembly, if he shuts it down then he shuts down discussion, he shuts down dialogue,” the Opposition Leader reiterated.
When asked about an audience summoned by the Head of State, Granger said, “I can’t see what he (President) would have to discuss with me that cannot be discussed in the National Assembly.”
The Opposition Leader believes that to prorogue Parliament is a very risky step for the President to take since according to him, citizens are “angry and fed up with the PPP (People’s Progressive Party) government.”
“The people are angry; they are angry with the Anil Gate, they are angry with the corruption they have seen over the last 22 years and the people are angry with Tuesday night’s broadcast; threatening to shut down their Parliament.”
“It’s their parliament,” Granger said, “not the PPP’s parliament. It’s the People’s Parliament.”
Granger related also that against the President’s proposed decision, there will be resistance from the APNU. “It is not something we will accept and it is not something we will encourage our supporters to accept,” Granger said.
He opined that, “This is an abomination. There is no state of emergency, national flood or catastrophe. There is no justification for shutting down the National Assembly whether for a long period or a short one. It is a denial of democracy. Democracy means that the elected representatives of the people must go to the National Assembly and discuss matters of public interest.”
When asked about forms of resistance, Granger said APNU will support whatever decision the people makes. On fears that protest could be manipulated and create ethnic divide, Granger said that he believes the people are dissatisfied and “the PPP has crossed ethnic lines already.”
He said the Opposition’s concern is not the PPP, “but the representation of the People’s interest. If they choose to protest, we will support them.”
President Ramotar told reporters also that he has decided what he will do with Parliament. While he chose not to make his intentions known, he said, “I have decided.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

When asked about forms of resistance, Granger said APNU will support whatever decision the people makes. On fears that protest could be manipulated and create ethnic divide, Granger said that he believes the people are dissatisfied and “the PPP has crossed ethnic lines already.”

FM
Originally Posted by asj:

When asked about forms of resistance, Granger said APNU will support whatever decision the people makes. On fears that protest could be manipulated and create ethnic divide, Granger said that he believes the people are dissatisfied and “the PPP has crossed ethnic lines already.”

 

Like Granger play this one good. Dem loud mouts like Harse MAn and Sase dey want protest but dem live in Merika. LOL

FM

President issues notice to prorogue Parliament – Speaker

November 10, 2014 · By Stabroek editor

President Donald Ramotar this morning issued a notice to prorogue Parliament, Speaker of the National Assembly Raphael Trotman has confirmed.

However, Trotman said there may still be a sitting of Parliament today since the notice has not yet been published in the Official Gazette as is required under the General Clauses of the Laws of Guyana, Chapter 10: 0, Section 21.


The Speaker said that once the notice is not in the Official Gazette by 2 pm today then a sitting will be held but he made it clear that there is time for this to be done via an “extraordinary publication.”

Keith
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Extraordinary Publication it will be.  Let us ALL RESPECT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA!!!    AMEN!!!

Constitution that supports dictatorship.

 

The 1980 Guyana Constitution is Illegal

March 13, 2013 | By | Filed Under Letters 

 

Dear Editor,
The Constitution of ones country is sacred and paramount and ought to, should be and must be … upheld, observed and supported in every way by all its subjects.
It is treasonous to defy your country’s constitution for it represents the “The Holy Grail of everything Guyanese”.
The current document that is presented to us as a Constitution was promulgated through a referendum in 1978 that was massively fraudulent.
We as Guyanese, all know the truth of that exercise to get the consent, rejection in that vote for the House/Mouse in 1978..The nation did not entertain the proposal by the PNC/Burnham undemocratic regime to perpetuate themselves upon the Guyanese nation.
We were already living under the “Declaration of Sophia” and the “Paramountcy of the Party” which in itself were the products of very fraudulent elections in 1968 and 1973. But that was not sufficient for the ruling regime at the time. It wanted absolute, undiluted power over Guyana.
Not only did I not try to exercise my franchise for the very first time in my life in Guyana but I actively organised bottom house meetings, some with over three hundred villagers present, in the Williamsburg/Hampshire villages on the Corentyne against the referendum.
The turnout {in support of that Referendum} was a paltry 10 percent. That was a resounding national, public rejection.
Therefore anything emanating from  that exercise would be unlawful, illegal and hence, null and void.
Thus, the current Guyana Constitution of 1980 is unlawful, illegal, null and void and ought to, should be and must be resisted, rejected and dismissed forthwith by all decent minded Guyanese.
This constitution represents the “Chalice of Indignities” in the life and existence of Guyanese both at home and in the diaspora.
Our mantra from now on should be: Out of evil cometh evil; The Referendum of 1978 was rejected and therefore its handmaiden, the 1980 Constitution, is rejected.
Anything stemming from that illegal constitution is illegal, as is the Presidency of Guyana.
I have actively opposed all its presidents (the current 1980 constitution) from Forbes Burnham, Desmond Hoyte, Cheddi Jagan, Samuel Hinds, Janet Jagan, Bharrat Jagdeo and now Donald Ramotar!
Our Independence constitution of 1966 is our legal and lawful constitution!
I am prepared to suffer the consequences of my patriotic, principled position and stance.
One man of courage makes a majority…Andrew Jackson.
 Lionel Peters

 

Django

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×