Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

No Permission! – Businessman objects to vendors occupying land with stalls

 Hareshnarine Sugrim

Hareshnarine Sugrim

After Town Clerk Royston King declared that all vendors in the Stabroek Market Square and environs would be moved to a new location, the move is in jeopardy as the businessman objected to vendors with stalls.

This comes even as the City Constabulary on Tuesday morning continued to seize the stalls and other vending infrastructure belonging to vendors in the area.

As vendors attempted to make their move to the designated land, they were greeted with three large padlocks and news that the owner of the land did not have a formal agreement with the Mayor and City Council.

Demerara Waves managed to secure a comment from the owner of the property, Hareshnarine ‘Chinee’ Sugrim who said that while he was not opposed to persons vending on the land, he had some conditions of his own that have not been met.

First on Sugrims conditions was that the agreement with the Town Clerk be legally binding. He said that while a verbal agreement was made, he has requested that everything be put into writing before the City Council moves forward.

“The town clerk has asked me to borrow the land for three months but we have to go to the lawyer to get a proper document but when the three months is up everybody evacuates from there…We are not allowing anybody or the city council or anybody to build everything there … it is just for vendors who selling farm produce,” the man told Demerara Waves.

He said that he placed a padlock of his own on the gates and until such time that there is a legally enforceable document he will not allow anyone to occupy his land.

“No permission is granted until we get a proper documentation from the Attorneys and the courts… we don’t want when time meet and the three months up they own the place…I gave him a verbal talking but I told him I need legal documents before anybody occupies the place,” he stated.

It should be noted that most of the vendors that are to be relocated are not fresh produce vendors. Rather these are individuals who trade haberdasheries among other items.

Back at City Council, attempts were made to get a comment from the Town Clerk however journalists were told to return tomorrow.

Georgetown’s Deputy Mayor Sherod Duncan is however urging that vendors remain calm as the Councillors attempt to work out a solution to the issue.

He stated that already a meeting was held with ten representatives from the Market and a meeting with all of the vendors planned for Friday.

There will also be an attempt to have an emergency meeting with the City Councillors.

Duncan said that there are plans to “discuss the way forward as to the piece of land that was being granted to us for the vending process” which means that “everything is at a standstill until Friday.”

Defending the move by the Council, Duncan pointed out that “vending as far as the law allows it is supposed to be a walk and sell affair…really and truly we are going a little beyond our remit.”

Even as these statements were being made hundreds of vendors had gathered at the Regent Street Entrance to the City Council in protest of the move against them.

They said that the move and its delays will essentially put them on the breadline since it will mean no income for them over the next few days.

Others groups had also gathered at different points in the city in protest and discussing the move by the Town Clerk.

Some had also staged a protest outside of the official residence of Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo and outside of the Ministry of the Presidency.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

We got a jokey govt in place, they making agreements that are not backed by any legal documents. Sugrim have a valid point, if he doesn't get a solid agreement, he will have lots of problems evicting people from the property.  With property in GT so expensive, I doubt that any permanent solution is in the works.  In fact I believe that this is just a scam to get the vendors moved for the 50th sport and then bring them back once it is over. 

FM
yuji22 posted:

PNC Brute force and aggression. Burnham days are back !

vendors

I would not shed a tear.  Come election tomorrow, they all will run vote PNC!  I like how them bannas got their big guns at the ready.  Let them suffer!  Ahwee dayzz now!!

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Maybe PNC in power is not so bad after all, they can manhandle their operatives with little or no resistance. Imagine if the PNC was in charge during the Agricola and Linden incidents, the PNC supporters would not riot and kill as they are afraid of their masters. 

FM
ba$eman posted:
yuji22 posted:

PNC Brute force and aggression. Burnham days are back !

vendors

I would not shed a tear.  Come election tomorrow, they all will run vote PNC!  I like how them bannas got their big guns at the ready.  Let them suffer!  Ahwee dayzz now!!

Just like how the PPP destroyed the sugar industry, and closed down factories and yet the sugar workers still ran to the PPP.

FM

Demerara Waves managed to secure a comment from the owner of the property, Hareshnarine ‘Chinee’ Sugrim who said that while he was not opposed to persons vending on the land, he had some conditions of his own that have not been met.

Why must Sugrim  forced to allow these street vendors to use his land, he will have a difficult time to remove them later, they squat.

K
kp posted:

.

Why must Sugrim  forced to allow these street vendors to use his land, he will have a difficult time to remove them later, they squat.

Is he being forced?  The man exercised his rights to padlock his gate, and I don't see either vendors or the city gov't breaking it down.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×