Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Mines Commission responds to AFC …Nothing stops any local, foreign companies from getting mining concessions – GGMC

June 7, 2013, By , Filed Under News, Source

 

The Guyana Geology and Mines Commission (GGMC) has defended its decision to grant two Prospecting Licences (PLs) to explore for gold in North West District, Region One, to an Indian-based company with alleged close ties with the government.


GGMC said that Surendra Mines Guyana Inc., a local subsidiary of Surendra Engineering Corporation Limited, met all the mandatory requirements with no public objections made during the processing stage.


On Wednesday, the Alliance For Change (AFC) questioned the PLs which were approved in March, and said that the relationship between government and Surendra seemed suspicious. The company has been granted a number of critical contracts from government. These included the US$12.5M sugar packaging plant at Enmore, East Coast Demerara; a US$4M order for over a dozen drainage pumps; a US$19M contract for the Specialty Hospital and contracts to supply parts for the Guyana Sugar Corporation (GuySuCo).


AFC Leader Khemraj Ramjattan on Wednesday said that despite little or no experience in the areas regarding the contracts, the company was still granted contracts, raising questions whether the company was a “favourite” of the administration. GuySuCo has reportedly blacklisted Surendra from future contracts.


AFC also pointed out that in the cases of the contracts, Minister Robert Persaud was involved at Agriculture Ministry and now at the Natural Resources Ministry.


But yesterday, GGMC which is charged with overseeing mining, made it clear that there is nothing barring any companies, local and overseas, or locals from applying.


“After satisfactory submission of the required documents the application is processed and, if recommended will be sent to the official gazette for publication. If there are no objections to the grant then ministerial approval is sought,” GGMC said in a statement.


Surendra Mines, according to the Commission, applied on March 2, 2012 and was granted two licences to conduct prospecting activities on March 4 of this year. This was after the routine due diligence checks that are conducted for all applications. On April 5, 2012, the GGMC’s Board of Directors approved the applications and it was published in the Gazette seven months later on November 10.


After receiving no objections, clarifications or comments, the two Prospecting Licences were granted on March 4, 2013.


“The term of the Prospecting Licence is for three years, with two rights of renewal of one year each. The Mining Act 1989 stipulates that three months prior to each anniversary date of licence, a work programme and budget for the following year must be presented for approval for the work to be undertaken during the following year,” GGMC explained.


The Ministry said it has, in the interest of accountability and transparency, advertised the list of applications for Prospecting Licences, Mining Permits and Prospecting Permits Medium Scale. The Prospecting Licence’s application for Surendra Mines Guyana Inc was even contained in full page advertisements including the Kaieteur News on July 13, 2012, GGMC said.


“This was done to receive any objections or comments. None were received. Additionally, the list was also circulated to the media on July 12, 2012. Further, the granting of a Prospecting Licence is not a licence to mine but rather to prospect before consideration to grant approval for mining.”


GGMC insisted that there is no secrecy and said that the process is open for review for any stakeholders.


“Further, the Government through the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Environment also subscribed to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative to have a high level of standard and transparency in the operation of the mining sector. We reject any insinuations on the granting of this or any Prospecting Licence.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Contractor out of India gets mining concession… enjoys privileged position with Govt

*gets US$12.5M for sugar packaging plant but never built one before
*gets US$4M drainage pumps contract but never built any before
*gets US$19M contract for Specialty Hospital, never built one
*blacklisted by GuySuCo for supplying poor quality parts

 

June 6, 2013, By , Filed Under News, Source

 

Over 25,000 acres of lands in the gold bush has been granted to an Indian contractor and a Parliamentary party is now raising questions.


The company, Indian-owned Surendra Mines Guyana Inc., was granted two Prospecting Licences (PLs) in early March, one year after applying for the licences.

 

AFC’s Leader, Khemraj Ramjattan

 

The company is linked to Surendra Engineering Corporation Limited, the same company that built the US$12.5M sugar packaging plant at Enmore, East Coast Demerara. The two companies share the same directors.


The company was later awarded another contract to supply large drainage pumps to the tune of US$4M. Surendra also won a US$19M contract to build a specialty hospital at Turkeyen, East Coast Demerara.


The Prospecting Licences for the lands which are located in North West District, Region One, led the Alliance For Change (AFC) to believe that the company is a “privileged” one.


“There is no doubt in my mind that Surendra Engineering is now part of the PPP’s circle of family, friends and favourites. That company will get whatever it wants, tendered or untendered, because it is so close to the former President (Bharrat Jagdeo) and former Minister of Agriculture (Robert Persaud),” AFC Leader, Khemraj Ramjattan said last evening.


Ramjattan, whose party has seven seats in the National Assembly and together with A Partnership For National Unity (APNU), has a one-seat voting majority, said that indications are that Surendra never built a packaging plant, yet it won a contract worth US$12.5M.


“This was under Robert Persaud’s stewardship as the Agriculture Minister to construct the Enmore packaging plant. Though huge problems persist with the operational functioning of that plant, Surendra was paid all its monies.”


It will be recalled that when the project cost was challenged, Minister Persaud said that he would facilitate any value-for-money audit. The challenge was accepted by Chartered Accountant Christopher Ram. Immediately Persaud backpedalled. The value-for-money audit was never conducted, Ramjattan said.


Ramjattan also noted that while evidence suggests that Surendra never built a specialty hospital, it won a contract worth US$19M to build one here.


“It won even against Fedders Lloyd. Only in Guyana. It never built mobile nor vertical drainage and irrigation pumps, yet it won a contract for US$4M to provide a dozen or more pumps which were to have been delivered since eight months now. It won against the giant pump manufacturer Kirkloskar of India. No penalty. Rather, some generous extensions.”

 

Robert Persaud

 

The Parliamentarian said that Surendra was granted a number of other contracts to provide the Guyana Sugar Corporation with parts. “GuySuCo had to blacklist this company because the parts were not up to the endurance levels represented. Probably that is one reason why GuySuCo is where it is today.”


With no indications that Surendra was ever involved in gold mining, the granting of the PLs raises even more questions over the company.


“It never was in the mining of gold business, yet it gets prospecting licences. Marudi miners cannot even get a claim to work for their daily survival. Surendra has really struck gold here in Guyana.”


Ramjattan also said that it is the same Minister Persaud who is now the Minister of Natural Resources, a new ministry, which has jurisdictions over mining concessions in Guyana.


“The AFC will be asking certain questions concerning mining policy and administration in the Assembly. These developments it sees as being reeked with rottenness. The sultans and sahibs continue unchecked.”


The demand for gold in recent years on the world market has driven prices up with the sector raking in the biggest earnings for Guyana last year. Along the way came the demand for lands to mine and the problems that came along with it.


The Opposition, since the 2011 General Elections, has been waging a war against what it claims to be corruption in the administration.

FM

 Surendra was granted a number of other contracts to provide the Guyana Sugar Corporation with parts. “GuySuCo had to blacklist this company because the parts were not up to the endurance levels represented. Probably that is one reason why GuySuCo is where it is today.”

Mitwah

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×