Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

THE proclamation by President Donald Ramotar to prorogue Parliament, which has effectively suspended the first session of the 10th Parliament for up to six months, has attracted global attention.

President Donald Ramotar

President Donald Ramotar

Secretary-General of the Organization of American States (OAS), Jose Miguel Insulza, has conceded that the move was made within the nation’s constitutional framework.

“The prorogation of the Parliament of Guyana issued by President Ramotar has occurred within the framework of the country’s constitution,” he said in a statement released on Monday evening.

Mr Insulza said that, in a democracy, an efficient functioning of the Parliament allows for checks and balances and for the voice of the people to be heard. He acknowledged that since the last elections in November 2011, Guyana has had a “split governance system”, with the executive controlled by one party and the combined Opposition having the majority in Parliament.

“This situation presents both challenges and opportunities for all parties in Guyana to work together for the greater good of the country,” he said.

To this end, the OSA Secretary-General has called on local political leaders to redouble their efforts to reach an understanding and compromise on the major political and socio-economic issues facing the country.

President Ramotar’s decision followed an address he had made to the nation on November 4th in which he stated that it was his desire for the National Assembly, in its post-recess sittings, to deliberate and give priority to important matters relating to the development of the country and the future of all Guyanese.

Unfortunately, A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) and the Alliance For Change (AFC) indicated an intention to push ahead with the AFC-sponsored no-confidence motion, which would have triggered a dissolution of the 10th Parliament and make way for fresh general elections.

As such, the President, in keeping with his November 4 commitment, moved to prorogue the National Assembly to pave the way for greater dialogue in the interest of the Guyanese people.

The presidential right to prorogue Parliament is one that is common in the constitutions of Commonwealth countries, making it a commonly used tool Governments resort to. However, this is the first time such a move has been made in Guyana, and it has been brought on by the current circumstance.
Section 70 (1) of the Guyana Constitution states that: “The President may at any time by proclamation prorogue Parliament.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The secretary general has not confirmed that it is legal. So stop lying and damaging the reputation of the secretary general. What he did say that it was done within the nation's constitutional framework. That's not the same as saying that it is legal.

Mr.T
Originally Posted by Mr.T:

The secretary general has not confirmed that it is legal. So stop lying and damaging the reputation of the secretary general. What he did say that it was done within the nation's constitutional framework. That's not the same as saying that it is legal.

Why is not legal if it was done within the nation's constitutional framework? You are not too rational.

FM

The fact that Ramotar has used the Burnham constitution, and the Burnham constitution allows this doesn't make it right.  There is a similar situation in St Kitts Nevis where two MPs from the govt party joined with the opposition to demand an MONC vote.  Their parliament is still functioning even though the gov't is using delaying tactics to give it time to buy votes by creating ghost jobs and giving people homes.

 

Ramotar has shut down parliament and yet wants dialogue?  That seems so hyprocritical.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×