@Django posted:

When they behave themselves, then they would be allowed to enter again.

Those three persons mentioned had nothing to do with it. 

@Ramakant-P posted:

When they behave themselves, then they would be allowed to enter again.

Those three persons mentioned had nothing to do with it.

What three persons ???

@Django posted:

What three persons ???

You posted that article. Why don't you read it?

Priya Manickchand, Vindhya Vasini Persaud, and Hon Minister Deodat Indar?

@Ramakant-P posted:

You posted that article. Why don't you read it?

Priya Manickchand, Vindhya Vasini Persaud, and Hon Minister Deodat Indar?

Don't seem to understand the post ,the three persons was tagged by Mahipaul.

Will be looking at the live video from parliament to see the opposition parliamentarians attendance.

@Django posted:

Don't seem to understand the post ,the three persons was tagged by Mahipaul.

Mahipaul is a joke. He does not know the difference between the Central Government and the Regional Government.

@Ramakant-P posted:

Mahipaul is a joke. He does not know the difference between the Central Government and the Regional Government.

LOL

You does try !!!!

@Django posted:

LOL

You does try !!!!

Better than not trying at all.

@Ramakant-P posted:

Mahipaul is a joke. He does not know the difference between the Central Government and the Regional Government.

That's a touchy subject, don't go there he is related to a GNIer. We all know that Mahipaul is a PNC turn coat.

@kp posted:

That's a touchy subject, don't go there he is related to a GNIer. We all know that Mahipaul is a PNC turn coat.

Yeh. Like you.

@Mitwah posted:

Yeh. Like you.

FK off loser.

@kp posted:

FK off loser.

Speaking to the man in the mirror eh.

@Mitwah posted:

Speaking to the man in the mirror eh.

The mirror in your bedroom. EH!!

APNU+AFC no show at the debate to amend Law Reform Commission Act

Although some of its members were physically present at the Arthur Chung Conference Centre where a sitting of the National Assembly is ongoing, the Members of Parliament of the A Partnership for National Unity + Alliance For Change (APNU+AFC) Coalition opposition were absent from the Chambers.

They were in effect sitting out the debate on amendments to the Law Reform Commission Act – an Act that was passed in 2016 by the then coalition government.

Attorney-General and Minister of Legal Affairs, Anil Nandlall, SC, had brought the amendments to the House, promising a wider range of eligible candidates to be appointed.

On Thursday, during the presentations by government MPs and a lone opposition MP, Deputy Speaker Lenox Shuman, Nandlall upheld that reasoning.

He said since the Act was passed in 2016, no Commission had been appointed with well over $100 million expended.  Nandlall told the House that the staff were paid high salaries when compared to more qualified persons working at his Chambers.

As a consequence, Nandlall said while the government has retained the staff at the Law Reform Commission, it has terminated the previous contracts to allow for alteration to the salaries.

The Attorney-General told the House that the amendments, once passed, will see the appointment of persons other than lawyers, who are trained in finance, natural and social sciences, and law enforcement.

The amendments will also mandate that the private sector and other sections of society are consulted, and provide nominees for appointments. The current Act vests in the President the power to appoint the entire Commission, consulting only the minister, and only legally-trained persons are allowed to be part of the Commission.

That, the AG said, is fundamentally flawed, noting that a Law Reform Commission is much larger than the government of the day. The Attorney-General explained that law reform ensures that the country’s laws are updated at periodic intervals, and captures and embraces the aspirations, exigencies, social maladies and vicissitudes of the society as it evolves.

Currently, he said, Guyana’s law reform is done in a “piecemeal manner” where sections of the laws are reformed based on international obligations, and as a requirement to qualify for financing.

Nandlall noted that prior to 2015, he could not implement a Law Reform Commission since there was no law revision. The last law revision exercise was done 30 years before 2013, in 1978. An exercise to consolidate the legislation started in 2010 and was completed under Nandlall’s leadership.

The amendments were subsequently passed in the National Assembly in the absence of the APNU+AFC.

The Law Reform Commission is an advisory body to the State. It can recommend to Parliament amendments to existing laws, new legislation, and repeal existing legislation. The establishment of a Law Reform Commission is part of a fundamental component of the US$8 million Inter-American Development Bank-funded Support for the Criminal Justice System Programme.

DG. You are the only remaining creditable poster on this forum.  Keep shining the light of truth. You have courage.

@kp posted:

DG. You are the only remaining creditable poster on this forum.  Keep shining the light of truth. You have courage.

Is that so ? that article from who mouth piece ?

@kp posted:

FK off loser.

So you show up to disparage the forum ,is that your agenda ?

@Django posted:

So you show up to disparage the forum ,is that your agenda ?

What you have to gain defending Mitwah? You are good at being selective.

@kp posted:

What you have to gain defending Mitwah? You are good at being selective.

He defends all the enemies of the PPP/C government not only Mitwah.

@kp posted:

What you have to gain defending Mitwah? You are good at being selective.

Not defending anyone ,there is the penchant to ridicule members .

@Ramakant-P posted:

He defends all the enemies of the PPP/C government not only Mitwah.

Who said they are enemies ? you'll don't like nothing said about the kleptocrats. Grow up this 21 st Century.

@Django posted:

Who said they are enemies ? you'll don't like nothing said about the kleptocrats.

Nobody is a kleptocrat.  Where is your proof?

@Ramakant-P posted:

Nobody is a kleptocrat.  Where is your proof?

Proof doesn't go hand in hand with die hard supporters ,they never see nothing wrong.

@Django posted:

Not defending anyone ,there is the penchant to ridicule members .

You are a joke. I wonder why you picking on me. Tell yuh buddy not to come at me otherwise I will take matter seriously  and reply in kind.

@kp posted:

You are a joke. I wonder why you picking on me. Tell yuh buddy not to come at me otherwise I will take matter seriously  and reply in kind.

You have an axe to grind ,take it somewhere else . Looks like you want to see who is a joke.

@Ramakant-P posted:

Nobody is a kleptocrat.  Where is your proof?

In the mansions!

@Django posted:

You have an axe to grind ,take it somewhere else . Looks like you want to see who is a joke.

Threats of that nature caused posters to leave this site that Amral  built.  Gone are Baseman. Skeldonman,  Yuji, Dave, Alana, Bible, Kazma  just to name a few. I know you are itching to ban me.

@Former Member posted:

In the mansions!

Yes sir.  It is the proof.  It is always the proof.  When people's lifestyles and assets outpace their incomes there is fraud.  This is why many countries including India and the UK have disproportionate assets or unexplained income laws.   

Guyana politicians can't afford those laws! Too detrimental to their other sources of income!

Yuh mekin juk ar wha?

@kp posted:

Threats of that nature caused posters to leave this site that Amral  built.  Gone are Baseman. Skeldonman,  Yuji, Dave, Alana, Bible, Kazma  just to name a few.

I know you are itching to ban me.

Not really !!!

The crew  [ late comers to Amral Site] left for their own reasons ,in a few months would be a year .

Alena and Bibi still here ,in few months I am here 20 yrs.

@Django posted:

Proof doesn't go hand in hand with die hard supporters ,they never see nothing wrong.

Their activities last time they were in government may be questionable but this time it is unreproachable. There is a new sheriff in town and he is squeaky clean.

@Ramakant-P posted:

Their activities last time they were in government may be questionable but this time it is unreproachable.

There is a new sheriff in town and he is squeaky clean.

LOL

Was the tea adulterated this morning ?

PS: Donald Trump sent his supporters to invade the US capital.  We cannot let that happen in Guyana.  This is not 1963/1964 when the PNC supporters under strict orders from Cousin Hammie, burned down Georgetown.

The Police force did a good job keeping the hooligans out of parliament.

Those Policemen are members of the PNC.

@Ramakant-P posted:

Their activities last time they were in government may be questionable but this time it is unreproachable. There is a new sheriff in town and he is squeaky clean.

I doubt you know the meaning of 'unreproachable', you PPP cockroach!

Squeaky clean? I guess a hibernation of a few years makes them so in your befuddled, degenerate 'thinking', huh? Those opposed to them haven't forgotten! They still stink, if clean!

Dem paryumintayryunz onlee playin dere usyul BS trix! Lokid owt muh arse!

@Former Member posted:

Dem paryumintayryunz onlee playin dere usyul BS trix! Lokid owt muh arse!

Talking shit again.

@Former Member posted:

I doubt you know the meaning of 'unreproachable', you PPP cockroach!

Squeaky clean? I guess a hibernation of a few years makes them so in your befuddled, degenerate 'thinking', huh? Those opposed to them haven't forgotten! They still stink, if clean!

I cannot say the same for you.  The man is unreproachable and he is squeaky clean. You should stop attacking me and address the issues which you are incapable of doing.  You are the one who sticks.  Every time you opened your mouth you spewed shit.

@Ramakant-P posted:

Talking shit again.

Thank you for acknowledging that's what you do.