https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vICWdaJmJA
I caught the last part of the show.
Shulman was in fine form....I find him very impressive.
Texiera was more historical.
Dr. Hinds sounded more like a member of the PNC, rather than the WPA.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vICWdaJmJA
I caught the last part of the show.
Shulman was in fine form....I find him very impressive.
Texiera was more historical.
Dr. Hinds sounded more like a member of the PNC, rather than the WPA.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
There was no PNC there so Hinds had to do double juty. I hope Sase pays him double.
We have never paid anyone to appear on our show
We are all volunteers
Our primary and sole sponsor is globespan 24/7, and Nohar Singh of Travelspan
Okay. I was thinking that they were payed political commentators. My apologies.
Prashad posted:Okay. I was thinking that they were payed political commentators. My apologies.
I was supposed to be on one of those shows. Timing needs to be worked out.
Vish M posted:We have never paid anyone to appear on our show
We are all volunteers
Our primary and sole sponsor is globespan 24/7, and Nohar Singh of Travelspan
Vish,
i tried getting some of the previous ones...are they both on Facebook and Youtube as well?
And, why dont you guys get some of the more important people on the show, like President Granger, Jagdeo, Irfaan, Nagamootoo, Patterson, etc?
The national list of electors in its current form is not one which the APNU+AFC coalition believes could hand them a victory at the next general and regional elections.
This is the contention of Dr David Hinds, Executive Member of the Working Peoplesâ Alliance (WPA) â one of the parties in the coalition.
Dr Hinds made the suggestion during a live online panel discussion on Globespan 24X7 which was hosted by former AFC member Sasenarine Singh.
The other panellists were PPPâs Gail Teixeira and Lenox Shuman of the newly formed Justice and Liberty Party (JLP).
During the discussion, Teixeira questioned why the Government was âperplexedâ by the list, given that they have maintained that no elections should be held until the existing list is sanitized and updated through house-to-house registration.
With more than 600,000 persons listed as eligible voters in a country with a population of 744,000, the coalition has raised two main concerns about the list.
The first is that thousands of youths, who did not meet the age requirement during the last registration period, are excluded from the current list even though they would now be eligible to vote.
Secondly, they believe that thousands of dead people are still listed as eligible voters.
And according to Dr Hinds, the PPP is pushing for general elections with the current list because that party believes it can hand them a victory, however, he was keen to note that it is the opposite for the coalition.
âBoth of you [PPP and APNU+AFC] all looked at the list. Your party [PPP] see that you can win with that list, the other one see that perhaps they could lose with that listâĶ and yâall are clouding it in all kinds of legal this and legal that. It comes down to that.
Dave posted:
David Hinds says APNU+AFC canât win elections with current list
The national list of electors in its current form is not one which the APNU+AFC coalition believes could hand them a victory at the next general and regional elections.
This is the contention of Dr David Hinds, Executive Member of the Working Peoplesâ Alliance (WPA) â one of the parties in the coalition.
Dr Hinds made the suggestion during a live online panel discussion on Globespan 24X7 which was hosted by former AFC member Sasenarine Singh.
The other panellists were PPPâs Gail Teixeira and Lenox Shuman of the newly formed Justice and Liberty Party (JLP).
During the discussion, Teixeira questioned why the Government was âperplexedâ by the list, given that they have maintained that no elections should be held until the existing list is sanitized and updated through house-to-house registration.
With more than 600,000 persons listed as eligible voters in a country with a population of 744,000, the coalition has raised two main concerns about the list.
The first is that thousands of youths, who did not meet the age requirement during the last registration period, are excluded from the current list even though they would now be eligible to vote.
Secondly, they believe that thousands of dead people are still listed as eligible voters.
And according to Dr Hinds, the PPP is pushing for general elections with the current list because that party believes it can hand them a victory, however, he was keen to note that it is the opposite for the coalition.
âBoth of you [PPP and APNU+AFC] all looked at the list. Your party [PPP] see that you can win with that list, the other one see that perhaps they could lose with that listâĶ and yâall are clouding it in all kinds of legal this and legal that. It comes down to that.
Hinds is a fool. This was the same list that the Coalition won with back in 2015.
Or is he now saying that he agrees with the PPP that the PPP actually won the elections back in 2015?
ksazma posted:Hinds is a fool. This was the same list that the Coalition won with back in 2015.
Or is he now saying that he agrees with the PPP that the PPP actually won the elections back in 2015?
the coalition in 2015 won in spite of the bloated list . . . in spite of PPP fraud
you bigots are sometimes amusing
Access to this requires a premium membership.