In Norway, Panel Lists Police Faults In Massacre
<h6 class="byline"> </h6><h6 class="byline">By MARK LEWIS</h6><h6 class="dateline">Published: August 13, 2012 -- Source</h6>STAVANGER, Norway — An independent inquest into the mass killings in Norway last summer by a fanatical anti-Muslim extremist sharply rebuked the country’s police and intelligence services Monday, saying they could have averted or at least disrupted his plot to bomb downtown Oslo and shoot unarmed people unimpeded at a summer youth camp.
The inquest by the panel, the July 22 Commission, named after the date of the massacre, said the police had failed in their duty to protect the camp on Utoya Island where 69 people, most of them teenagers, were killed by the extremist, Anders Behring Breivik. The inquest also faulted the police in Oslo, where hours earlier Mr. Breivik had parked a van packed with explosives that killed eight people. He was seen in a getaway car, which he drove to the island, but police officers failed to share a description of the vehicle.
The panel’s 500-page report chronicled what amounted to a litany of errors and blunders at nearly every level of law enforcement in Norway, a country that was traumatized by the scale and audacity of the attacks. A number of top judicial and security officials have already resigned over the failure to thwart Mr. Breivik.
Jens Stoltenberg, the prime minister, said he “deeply regretted” the failures outlined by the panel, which was given wide latitude to examine evidence and interview witnesses.
Mr. Breivik bragged about the killings during his trial and said he had acted to save Norway from multiculturalism. The verdict is expected on Aug. 24. Prosecutors have suggested that he be committed to psychiatric care instead of prison.
While much of what was contained in the inquest commission’s report was already known, it revealed that Norway’s internal intelligence service, the P.S.T., had been informed by customs officials seven months before the attacks that Mr. Breivik had bought a bomb-making chemical from Poland but that it did not act on that information.
The commission’s report was especially critical of the lapse by police officers in conveying crucial information after the bombing in Oslo.
“The nationwide message service failed seriously,” said the commission chairwoman, Alexandra Bech Gjorv. “Ten minutes after the bomb detonated, a person gave them information about a man in a police uniform holding a pistol who was acting strangely. The person said he got into a gray van. He gave the license plate number.”
“The person who took this call knew this was important,” she said. “She brought this information to the operations center. This lay around for 20 minutes. Once it was passed on, it was not read until two hours later.”
By then, Mr. Breivik was already on the island.
The commission’s report also castigated what it described as a woefully slow police response once it became clear that Mr. Breivik was shooting people.
Helicopters were not mobilized, and offers of boats from private individuals were ignored, Ms. Gjorv said. “This was completely unacceptable.”
She said a more effective response to warnings about Mr. Breivik would have revealed that he had been buying semiautomatic assault rifles and frequenting far-right Web sites. “Could he have been stopped?” she asked. “We can’t know for sure.”
The commission recommended that semiautomatic weapons be banned and Norwegian legislation on confidentiality be revised.
The report was critical of what it identified as bureaucratic failings between departments that had left government buildings in the center of Oslo vulnerable to attacks. The buildings had been considered potential terrorism targets as far back as 2006 in a security exercise that had recommended closing the street where Mr. Breivik parked his explosive-packed van.
