Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Pass AML/CFT Bill or call elections

…Region 2 residents declare at Anna Regina meeting

REGION 2 residents are insisting that fresh general elections be held if the embattled Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) (Amendment) Bill is not passed in the National Assembly as soon as possible.

They have taken this position after hearing, over the past several months, the parliamentary opposition parties’ various demands in exchange for their support for passage of this vital piece of legislation.

Speaking at a meeting at the Anna Regina Town Council, one resident recommended a countrywide picketing exercise to register the nation’s disapproval of the way the matter is being politicised by the political grouping A Partnership For National Unity (APNU) and by the Alliance For Change (AFC).

Another resident testified to the difficulties he personally experienced in receiving remittances, and also expressed concern that the non-passage of the bill might affect parents’ ability to send financial support in a timely and cost-effective manner to their children who are studying abroad.

A pastor who spoke on behalf of the religious community said that, with Guyana being named a non-compliant jurisdiction, serious repercussions could be visited on the various churches that are recipient of financial aid from similar international organisations.
Finance Minister Dr. Ashni Singh urged residents and regional officials of the various political parties to speak to their leaders, since their views can, and should, be able to influence or inform the decisions taken by those leaders.
Minister Singh said certain issues must be placed above partisan politics, and the AML/CFT Bill is one such issue.

He alluded to the united position taken by the Parliament of Belize, the only other regional country besides Guyana that had been blacklisted by the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF) in November last year, and explained that the Belizean Parliament passed the required legislation, effectively reconciling differences that had led to the country being blacklisted by CFATF through a conscious decision to work together in the interest of the nation.

“We have an Opposition that is saying that ‘we will not vote for this legislation unless you give us what we want in exchange’…it is almost like saying ‘I’m holding a gun to your head, and if you do not give me what I am insisting that you give me, I will pull the trigger’. That is essentially what is going on here,” Minister Singh declared.

He also explained in great detail the dire consequences that can follow if the AML/CFT Bill is not passed in a timely manner. The consequences of being blacklisted will not only affect every sector in the country, but will impact the lives of all Guyanese, he said.

Minister Singh noted that insurance for cars and the cost for food, transportation and other basic needs will be impacted if Guyana were blacklisted by FATF in May, when that body is scheduled to meet. Moreover, further sanctions would discourage foreign investors from coming into the country, Minister Singh explained, and this would negatively impact jobs international investors would have created via construction, production and manufacturing.

APNU Councillor Abdul Latiff, who attended the meeting, agreed that the AML/CFT Bill is a serious matter, and called for the political parties to work together to find a solution to the impasse.

Minister within the Ministry of Finance, Juan Eghill, explained that the opposition keeps shifting the goalpost to the point where it is now impossible to negotiate with them. Similar sentiments were echoed by Minister Singh, who chronicled the Opposition parties’ pattern of reneging from agreed positions.

The Opposition parties’ proposed amendment that empowers police, customs and FIU officials to seize currency was roundly criticised. Residents made it clear that this is not a legal provision they can support, since many of them have very little confidence in law enforcement officers.

Region 2 Vice Chairman Vishnu Samaroo said the upsurge in economic activities in an economy that is primarily cash-based makes $10M a small sum, especially for large businesses. He, too, called the opposition conditionalities unreasonable.

PPP MP Manzoor Nadir, who was also present at the meeting, reminded of the sanction that has already been imposed by CFATF, even as he refuted opposition-levied allegations that the Government had been “sitting on the bill” since 2011. He explained that CFATF came to review Guyana for the first time in 2010, and subsequently, in early 2011, they issued a first report in which they engaged the Government in talks on measures that ought to be taken.

They then issued a final report with the prescriptions which Guyana had to follow in order to become compliant. That report was issued in November 2011, at which time the Parliament had been dissolved and the country was in full elections mode.

“Because of that one-seat majority, they intend to play pure politics and rule over ruin, if they have to, because ruling is more important than the welfare of every man, woman and child,” Nadir said.

He informed the gathering of the experience of The Bahamas, which had been blacklisted in 2000. When the FATF placed the Bahamas on the list of non-compliant jurisdictions, it had to spend a total of US$35M from its treasury to come into compliance, he said.

Former Regional Chairman and Minister within the Ministry of Agriculture, Alli Baksh, emphasised the need for citizens to understand the gravity of the issue at hand, and the possible consequences that blacklisting could exact on the country’s future.

The AML/CFT Bill is currently before a parliamentary select committee, where it has been for over a year. That committee was scheduled to meet again on March 10.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by albert:

Pass AML/CFT Bill or call elections

…Region 2 residents declare at Anna Regina meeting

REGION 2 residents are insisting that fresh general elections be held if the embattled Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) (Amendment) Bill is not passed in the National Assembly as soon as possible.

They have taken this position after hearing, over the past several months, the parliamentary opposition parties’ various demands in exchange for their support for passage of this vital piece of legislation.

Speaking at a meeting at the Anna Regina Town Council, one resident recommended a countrywide picketing exercise to register the nation’s disapproval of the way the matter is being politicised by the political grouping A Partnership For National Unity (APNU) and by the Alliance For Change (AFC).

Another resident testified to the difficulties he personally experienced in receiving remittances, and also expressed concern that the non-passage of the bill might affect parents’ ability to send financial support in a timely and cost-effective manner to their children who are studying abroad.

A pastor who spoke on behalf of the religious community said that, with Guyana being named a non-compliant jurisdiction, serious repercussions could be visited on the various churches that are recipient of financial aid from similar international organisations.
Finance Minister Dr. Ashni Singh urged residents and regional officials of the various political parties to speak to their leaders, since their views can, and should, be able to influence or inform the decisions taken by those leaders.
Minister Singh said certain issues must be placed above partisan politics, and the AML/CFT Bill is one such issue.

He alluded to the united position taken by the Parliament of Belize, the only other regional country besides Guyana that had been blacklisted by the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF) in November last year, and explained that the Belizean Parliament passed the required legislation, effectively reconciling differences that had led to the country being blacklisted by CFATF through a conscious decision to work together in the interest of the nation.

“We have an Opposition that is saying that ‘we will not vote for this legislation unless you give us what we want in exchange’…it is almost like saying ‘I’m holding a gun to your head, and if you do not give me what I am insisting that you give me, I will pull the trigger’. That is essentially what is going on here,” Minister Singh declared.

He also explained in great detail the dire consequences that can follow if the AML/CFT Bill is not passed in a timely manner. The consequences of being blacklisted will not only affect every sector in the country, but will impact the lives of all Guyanese, he said.

Minister Singh noted that insurance for cars and the cost for food, transportation and other basic needs will be impacted if Guyana were blacklisted by FATF in May, when that body is scheduled to meet. Moreover, further sanctions would discourage foreign investors from coming into the country, Minister Singh explained, and this would negatively impact jobs international investors would have created via construction, production and manufacturing.

APNU Councillor Abdul Latiff, who attended the meeting, agreed that the AML/CFT Bill is a serious matter, and called for the political parties to work together to find a solution to the impasse.

Minister within the Ministry of Finance, Juan Eghill, explained that the opposition keeps shifting the goalpost to the point where it is now impossible to negotiate with them. Similar sentiments were echoed by Minister Singh, who chronicled the Opposition parties’ pattern of reneging from agreed positions.

The Opposition parties’ proposed amendment that empowers police, customs and FIU officials to seize currency was roundly criticised. Residents made it clear that this is not a legal provision they can support, since many of them have very little confidence in law enforcement officers.

Region 2 Vice Chairman Vishnu Samaroo said the upsurge in economic activities in an economy that is primarily cash-based makes $10M a small sum, especially for large businesses. He, too, called the opposition conditionalities unreasonable.

PPP MP Manzoor Nadir, who was also present at the meeting, reminded of the sanction that has already been imposed by CFATF, even as he refuted opposition-levied allegations that the Government had been “sitting on the bill” since 2011. He explained that CFATF came to review Guyana for the first time in 2010, and subsequently, in early 2011, they issued a first report in which they engaged the Government in talks on measures that ought to be taken.

They then issued a final report with the prescriptions which Guyana had to follow in order to become compliant. That report was issued in November 2011, at which time the Parliament had been dissolved and the country was in full elections mode.

“Because of that one-seat majority, they intend to play pure politics and rule over ruin, if they have to, because ruling is more important than the welfare of every man, woman and child,” Nadir said.

He informed the gathering of the experience of The Bahamas, which had been blacklisted in 2000. When the FATF placed the Bahamas on the list of non-compliant jurisdictions, it had to spend a total of US$35M from its treasury to come into compliance, he said.

Former Regional Chairman and Minister within the Ministry of Agriculture, Alli Baksh, emphasised the need for citizens to understand the gravity of the issue at hand, and the possible consequences that blacklisting could exact on the country’s future.

The AML/CFT Bill is currently before a parliamentary select committee, where it has been for over a year. That committee was scheduled to meet again on March 10.

fat Albert 49%and counting down

FM
Originally Posted by JB:

Power hungry PPP want majority to thief even more. God bless opposition for stalling Amaila. So much of the people money would have gone into Boca Raton and Miami mansions. 

this government crying is like pissing in the wind

FM

If the joint opposition believes they can do a better job at managing the affairs of the state, then what is preventing them from passing a vote of no confidence against the state?

FM

The Corrupt PPP/C can talk as much as they want, they can talk to whom they want to, they can talk till they piss their pants, and when all is done, they will have to come to the AFC/APNU and beg on bended knees...Pulese suh, help us nuh, and the answer will still be an emphatic no.

You dont want to appoint the Procurement Commision, you dont want to include the APNU amendments, then you get nothing.

FM
Originally Posted by asj:

The Corrupt PPP/C can talk as much as they want, they can talk to whom they want to, they can talk till they piss their pants, and when all is done, they will have to come to the AFC/APNU and beg on bended knees...Pulese suh, help us nuh, and the answer will still be an emphatic no.

You dont want to appoint the Procurement Commision, you dont want to include the APNU amendments, then you get nothing.

The PPP is not opposed to the PPC in fact it is your buddies who don't want the government of the day to have a say as to who it does business with. But at the same time you hold the government accountable for every societal ill

FM

Worried CARICOM Heads urge speedy passage of AMLCFT Bill

–Say non-compliance will affect entire Region

HEADS of Government of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) at their 25th Inter-Sessional Meeting in Kingstown, St Vincent, have issued a call for Guyana to pass the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (Amendment) Bill currently in a Special Select Committee of the National Assembly.

Attorney General Mr. Anil Nandlall

Attorney General Mr. Anil Nandlall

The Heads discussed the impasse in Guyana in caucus yesterday, and agreed that the non-passage of this piece of legislation will have devastating economic impacts, not only for Guyana, but the rest of the Region, if Guyana is blacklisted internationally.

alt

Prime Minister Freundel Stuart

The meeting is expected to issue a statement calling for a resolution to the issue.
According to Attorney-General and Minister of Legal Affairs, Mr Anil Nandlall, who participated in the meeting, “The meeting noted with dismay the fact that Guyana has been unable to pass the Bill which incorporates the recommendations of the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF).”
He added, “The meeting noted the implications it will have for Guyana, the Guyanese economy, the people of Guyana, and, more importantly, regional integration and the complications that will arise in the Region should Guyana be blacklisted.”
He said a statement will be issued shortly “calling on the relevant parties to pass the legislation with dispatch, because of the complexity and the problems that will arise in the Region and economic and financial activity.”
On March 7, Barbados’ Prime Minister, Mr Freundel Stuart, wrote President Donald Ramotar, expressing concern over the non-passage of the Bill and the implications it might have on the Caribbean.
“Without any doubt,” Prime Minister Stuart was quoted as saying, “this situation and the threatened action by CFATF will affect Guyana and the entire Caribbean Region, and will negatively impact the well-being of our people.”
He ended by saying: “I trust that during our Inter-sessional Meeting, we will be able to discuss this matter in caucus, and see what other action we can take, as a group, to assist Guyana at this juncture.”
Guyana, on February 28 last, missed a second CFATF deadline to pass the legislation. In November, it failed to meet the first time limit after the opposition used their one-seat majority in the National Assembly to vote down the bill, which led to the country being blacklisted at the regional level.
The opposition, at the last moment, proposed two amendments, both of which are not related to the CFATF-compliant Bill, but to the principal act, which was passed in 2009. One of the proposals seeks to give police and customs officers the authority to seize $10M in currency from Guyanese on the grounds of suspicion. Initially they had proposed $2M.
CFATF has no objection to the Bill in its current form, and its Financial Adviser Roger Hernandez said the regional watchdog body has concerns in relation to the amendments that the A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) proposed. Hernandez explained that some of the amendments put forward deal with previous areas of the Act that were deemed compliant
“The concern that we have is that the amendment put forward may make those areas that were formerly compliant, non-compliant,” he said.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), at the end of its plenary in France recently, said Guyana has to submit a report to the CFATF on its follow-up process by February 28, which means that the Bill has to be passed, enforced and submitted along with the report by that date to the CFATF. This body was expected to analyse the Bill on aspects of compliance with international standards, subsequent to which a report will be made to its plenary in May.
If the May plenary is dissatisfied with Guyana’s progress, the 2013 November statement (CFATF) already provides the decision for the country’s referral to FATF. In June 2014, the FATF is slated to meet, when it will make a decision as to whether Guyana should be subjected to a prima facie review by the International Co-operation Review Group (ICRG).
There has been tremendous public outcry over the opposition’s proposals, with the Private Sector Commission, religious groups, the National Competitiveness Council, labour unions, and residents across the country calling on the political parties to pass the bill. Their urgings have since fallen on deaf ears as the Opposition continues to be intransigent.
More recently, residents in several communities such as Lusignan, Mahaica, Anna Regina and Greenwich Park have demanded that the bill be passed or elections be held.

FM
Originally Posted by albert:
Originally Posted by asj:

The Corrupt PPP/C can talk as much as they want, they can talk to whom they want to, they can talk till they piss their pants, and when all is done, they will have to come to the AFC/APNU and beg on bended knees...Pulese suh, help us nuh, and the answer will still be an emphatic no.

You dont want to appoint the Procurement Commision, you dont want to include the APNU amendments, then you get nothing.

The PPP is not opposed to the PPC in fact it is your buddies who don't want the government of the day to have a say as to who it does business with. But at the same time you hold the government accountable for every societal ill

Albert ak Kwame, is where you gone again.  COME here let me put some VERBAL lash on yu tail.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×