Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

 

Persaud equates Budget taxation measures to ‘legal larceny’

PPP MP, Dr Vindiya Persaud
PPP MP, Dr Vindiya Persaud

In her presentation to the 2017 Budget debates, People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) Member of Parliament (MP)  Dr Vindiya Persaud posited to the house that the taxation measures proposed in the Budget presentation is tantamount to “legal larceny.”

She began her speech by first quoting the words of the 30th President of the United States, John Calvin Coolidge who said “the collection of taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not, beyond a reasonable doubt contribute to public welfare is only a species of legalized larceny.”

Persaud called for Guyanese to stand up to the Government and against the 2017 Budget, as according to her, the measures outlined in the budget will serve to make the poor, poorer and constrict the middle class populace.

“I want to tell people we do not need to take things silently…Say you don’t want this Budget, do not live in fear!” she urged.

Persaud described the budget as a “travesty” and “anti-people” and reiterated the many calls by the Opposition to withdraw the 2017 Budget, noting that “if this government is serious, withdraw this budget…do not give them [Guyanese] this as a Christmas present gone wrong.”

According to the Opposition MP, the administration seems to be living in a different reality than other Guyanese and questioned as to what offence the populace committed to have such dire measures placed upon them all at once.

Persaud asserted that with close to 200 tax measures being implemented in the previous budgets presented by the administration, she saw no need for an additional 57 other taxation measures that were presented during the Budget 2017 by Minister of Finance, Winston Jordan.

She stated that it was public knowledge that the taxes will increase the collection of funds, but questioned who would be gaining from it.

Persaud bantered that it could be that the need to acquire more funds is to facilitate the top heavy Cabinet and Government officials who had increased their salaries significantly, just months after taking office.

The House was told that the administration completely disregarded the impact that Value Added Tax on Electricity and Water would have on the citizens.

“The poor will get poorer, the growing middle class will constrict, contract and shrink,” she posited.

MP Persaud reprimanded the Government for “completely destroying the hope and optimism” of Guyanese, noting that they seem oblivious to the fact that many small businesses have begun to close as a result of the previous Budget measures along with the most recent lot.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Vindiya should focus on the Sanatan Dharmic larceny by the pundits. They use the Puranic literature for financial gains and steal from the people by not declaring their booty which they call dhakshna for  taxation.

Mitwah

The sad thing about all this is the drug economy and money laundering created a fake economy and the Guyanese people lived a life that could not be sustained based on a fake economy.

With pressure on drugs runnings and money laundering the money has to come from somewhere for them to be able to pay themselves and increase the budget for the Army etc.  No investment is done to simulate the economy.  

The electric system is a disaster even though the people have to pay extremely high rates.

Guyana might be heading for a reset re: recession or depression.

FM
Mitwah posted:

Vindiya should focus on the Sanatan Dharmic larceny by the pundits. They use the Puranic literature for financial gains and steal from the people by not declaring their booty which they call dhakshna for  taxation.

That may or may not be so Mitwah but as an MP she still has a responsibility to make Parliamentary citations.

For argument sake, what is the current number of Cabinet and government officials compared to that of the previous administration? Just plain numbers.

FM

It's all about sequencing and timing. The Minister is trying to do tough things during an economic downturn. The base has to increase just like Guyana needed a VAT when Jaggy introduced it in 2007. But it's kind of curious to expand tax burden when the economy is stagnant. They should have never cut the VAT. But they need to continue fine tuning the income taxes.  All those professionals and self-employed who don't pay income taxes (much greater numbers than drug dealers) just received a tax cut.

FM
TK posted:

It's all about sequencing and timing. The Minister is trying to do tough things during an economic downturn. The base has to increase just like Guyana needed a VAT when Jaggy introduced it in 2007. But it's kind of curious to expand tax burden when the economy is stagnant. They should have never cut the VAT. But they need to continue fine tuning the income taxes.  All those professionals and self-employed who don't pay income taxes (much greater numbers than drug dealers) just received a tax cut.

How can they stop the tax evaders?  I was thinking about this yesterday.  What about encouraging people to pay by check or credit card and force the evaders to accept this sort of payment?

They need to be a lot of undercover operations in Guyana.  The place needs a shakeup.

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×