Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Jagdeo, Ashni Singh pawn the future of Guyana – Moses Nagamootoo

February 10, 2013 | By | Filed Under News 

Guyana’s total public debt may be heading for a Parliamentary debate after revelations that last year, it was a staggering US$1.7B.
It does not include the Amaila Falls hydro project loan which would be more than US$800M or the US$130M for a new international airport at Timehri.

AFC’s MP, Moses Nagamootoo

Former President, Bharrat Jagdeo

Finance Minister, Dr. Ashni Singh

It also does not take into account the planned, Indian-built Specialty Hospital which is to be constructed with an Indian line of credit worth US$17M,
Twenty years ago, in 1992, when the ruling People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) took power, it inherited a debt of US$2B.
The exchange rate at the time was $126 to the United States dollar. This translated into some $263 billion in local currency.
Over the years, Guyana managed to have almost three-quarters of this debt written off from overseas bilateral financial institutions, the Paris Club and other lenders.
According to Vice Chairman of the Alliance For Change (AFC), Moses Nagamootoo, whose party has seven seats in the National Assembly, claims by Finance Minister, Dr. Ashni Singh, during his budget presentation last year that Guyana’s debt is at its lowest now in 20 years, may be totally misleading.
As a matter of fact, Nagamootoo, a former senior executive of the PPP/C, is examining the possibilities of raising the issue in the National Assembly for a possible debate. The debt at the time was $378 billion, including a $40 billion debt from local entities.
He believes that the debt rate is rising too quickly and unless checked, could prove threatening to Guyana’s future generations who will be saddled with the huge burden of repayments.
Responding to questions from Nagamootoo on the debt, the Finance Minister on Thursday said that as at September 30, 1992, it was US$2,087.99 M (US$2.09B). At that time the exchange rate for the US dollar was G$126. The debt was equivalent to G$263,086M.
This contrasted to March 31, 2012 when total public debt stood at US$1.743B at an exchange rate of G$204 to US$1. This was equivalent to G$355,580M.
According to Minister Singh, the total public debt stock at March 31, 2010 stood at $312,180.26M at an exchange rate of $203.50 for US$1.
As at December 31, 2010, the total public debt stock stood at $350,574.81M…at an exchange rate of $203 to US$1.
The figures would suggest that Guyana has been borrowing more. In addition to several road projects, Government is also paying back for the Skeldon Factory and a host of other initiatives.
Nagamootoo made it clear that the recent disclosure by Dr. Singh only reinforced that the fact that the country’s debt is at its highest.
“Dr. Singh and (former President Bharrat) Jagdeo are pawning the future of the country,” he said.
However, yesterday, during a press conference at the NCN studios, Minister Singh, insisted that his government has responsibly utilized the monies borrowed, as is evidenced from the many infrastructure projects, including schools and roads.
He pointed out that the debt figures had been a feature published every year in the national budget report and would also appear in the Bank of Guyana reports, in detail.
The US$1.7B last year is less than the $2B the government had inherited. In terms of amount, that is an accomplishment, he said.
Back in 1992, the country had nothing to show… the Treasury was empty and international reserves were almost zero. This was coupled with poor infrastructure…poor roads and facilities that were literally collapsing.
But a spokesman for the former government pointed to the various roads among the Soesdyke/Linden Highway, the West Demerara Highway, the Corentyne Highway, the Bank of Guyana building, the Timehri International Airport, the Harbour Bridge and many of the hinterland roads.
The PPP/C government had not only to rebuild the country, but raise Guyana’s creditworthiness, to prove to lenders that there is a framework of integrity in place, Dr Singh argued.
Twenty years later now, Guyana can say it has an improved country, with new schools, hospitals and roads, he added.
The country’s international reserves are its highest at US$800M-plus.
“This is what is different from 1992. We owe less but we have more to show. We have used responsibly the monies that we borrowed.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

What is the proper relationship between an inhabitant of a country, and
its unjust government?

 

This is an interesting and important question for the libertarian or objectivist philosopher, one to which not much attention has been paid in the literature.

FM

Very dismal performance at all sugar estates in 2012 but especially at Skeldon flagship

Posted By Staff Writer On March 22, 2013 @ 5:06 am In Letters | No Comments

Dear Editor,
Every year I give my analysis of how our sugar industry performed in the previous year, here is my report for 2012.

All estates are showing signs of poor labour turnout. In the year 2012 the industry showed the factories standing idle, out of cane and not grinding, during the first and second crops a total of 10,527 hours. The actual time the factories worked during the year was 21,623 hours. This means that due to an acute shortage of labour to cut the cane the factories were standing idle 50% of the time during the crops waiting for the cane to be delivered, needless to say that during a substantial part of this time the factory’s workers had to be paid for standing by doing nothing.

This alone prompts one to ask why are we struggling with this inefficient and costly industry which we are keeping alive because we are providing work for people who do not exist? It is clear that from these figures that for GuySuCo to survive more factories have to be closed or more efficient methods of delivering the cane to the factories must be developed.

This is entirely the fault of the government who should have been aware since 2000 that the workers were migrating away from the industry. In addition, beginning in 2006 the European Union [EU] had started paying the development fund to Guyana which was our compensation for the loss of the preferential price for sugar in the EU markets. The understanding was that this money was supposed to be used to make the industry more efficient and competitive and a substantial part of it should have been used to start the expensive process of converting the land for mechanical harvesting, on all estates, to offset the loss of workers.

This money was never released to GuySuCo and as recently as 2008 in a GuySuCo document called “Revised Commentary on Capital Budget 2008” [two years after the compensation to enhance the efficiency of the corporation had started to flow from the European Union] we see the following “the limited availability of funds in 2007 saw the factory investments limited to less than $350 million instead of the $1.35 Billion requested; and in 2008 the factories asked for $5.6 billion to do their capital works but were only given $2.34 billion, less than half what they needed”. The Board of GuySuCo noted in their summary of the 2008 capital cuts that “this starvation of funds will significantly restrict management’s ability to achieve their objectives outlined in the GuySuCo strategy plans”. There were substantial amounts of compensation paid to Guyana starting from 2006 and between 2006 to 2012 the total amount paid was $24.7 billion but GuySuCo got none of it.

In 2012 GuySuCo finally got a subvention of around 5 billion from the annual budget but the issue remains, today we have a poorly functioning sugar industry which had never received any of the $24.7 Billion Guyana dollars released to the Government of Guyana to rehabilitate and make competitive the Guyana sugar industry and was hijacked by the government to the detriment of the industry and the Guyana cane farmers who were entitled to their share of this money. Robert Persaud, then Minister of Agriculture should explain what was done with this money and why it was not spent where it was supposed to be spent in the sugar industry which, starved as it was for funds, has caused it to collapse in this manner in 2012! Given this government’s propensity for incompetence and corruption the money was clearly wasted on grandiose projects which cannot bring wealth to the nation or its people.

The Skeldon factory still shows signs of being a very bad investment. The factory has been literally throttled [as in strangled] down to grind at a rate of 196 tons cane an hour when in fact it was designed to operate efficiently at 350 tons an hour. The effects of this are apparent in its performance, the tons of cane to make a ton of sugar in 2012 at Skeldon was 16.29 whilst just next door Albion only took 10.52 tons of cane to make a ton of sugar. Skeldon therefore took 64.6% more cane to make a ton of sugar than Albion. One cannot buy and build a 350 ton per hour factory and grind at 196 tons per hour. The mills, the power generation depending on bagasse, the vessels for boiling the juice etc. all are underutilised operating at only around 56% of their rated capacity and must have a very substantial effect on the economics of running this costly and inefficient factory, and it is showing.

Also incredibly at Skeldon the amount of grinding time lost for mechanical reasons at the factory was 550.51 hours. During 2012 the time lost at all the other estate factories for the entire year 2012 was 2130.55 hours. So this brand new alleged state of the art factory accounted for 25% of the total factory downtime in the entire industry! All the other factories combined recorded a total of only 1580 hours.

The total industry production for the year 2012 was 218,069 tons, the lowest in over two decades. The production of the Skeldon factory was a total of 33,309 tons of sugar. Albion for example produced 54,022 tons. By this time, according to all of GuySuCo’s projections, Skeldon should be producing 100,000 tons of sugar. The disaster that is the Skeldon Sugar Modernisation Project [SSMP] continues and the time has come to ask if it is viable? At the very least a commission of enquiry should be set up to examine what has happened? and what is the way forward if in fact there is one.

For example the losses of sugar at the Skeldon factory are frightening. Sugar is haemorrhaging at this state of the art factory in massive quantities, in the filter press mud 1.18% of the sugar is lost, the highest in the industry, Albion for example was 0.51%. In the molasses 17.49% is lost, again the highest in the industry, Albion for example is 9.40%. The undermined losses at Skeldon were 6.45%, again the highest in the industry, Albion for example was only 1.29%. The boiling house recovery was also unacceptably low. The boiling house efficiency was the lowest in the industry at 88.67% whilst Albion was 99.52%, and the industry average was 97.40%.

The field data is equally depressing. The yield per hectare of sugar at Skeldon was 2.81 tons, the lowest in the industry. Albion by comparison yielded 5.35 tons sugar per hectare in 2012, but compared to our recent 30 years average of 2.5 tons per acre or 6.17 tons sugar per hectare, the industry average in 2012 was only 5 tons sugar per hectare. I won’t even try to show how this compares with Brazil and Australia but taken as a total around the planet the normal production average is more like 10 tons sugar per hectare.
All in all a very dismal performance at all estates but especially at Skeldon.

Yours faithfully,
Tony Vieira

FM

FACTS OF 2012:

 

"the tons of cane to make a ton of sugar in 2012 at Skeldon was 16.29 whilst just next door Albion only took 10.52 tons of cane to make a ton of sugar. Skeldon therefore took 64.6% more cane to make a ton of sugar than Albion."

 

Source:

 

BJ tek US$2 million for his pocket on this SKELDON white elephant and chinee give we chinee brush in exchange.  This is a US$200 million goodeeeeeee!

FM
Originally Posted by Ronald Narain:

Very dismal performance at all sugar estates in 2012 but especially at Skeldon flagship

Posted By Staff Writer On March 22, 2013 @ 5:06 am In Letters | No Comments

Dear Editor,
Every year I give my analysis of how our sugar industry performed in the previous year, here is my report for 2012.

All estates are showing signs of poor labour turnout. In the year 2012 the industry showed the factories standing idle, out of cane and not grinding, during the first and second crops a total of 10,527 hours. The actual time the factories worked during the year was 21,623 hours. This means that due to an acute shortage of labour to cut the cane the factories were standing idle 50% of the time during the crops waiting for the cane to be delivered, needless to say that during a substantial part of this time the factory’s workers had to be paid for standing by doing nothing.

This alone prompts one to ask why are we struggling with this inefficient and costly industry which we are keeping alive because we are providing work for people who do not exist? It is clear that from these figures that for GuySuCo to survive more factories have to be closed or more efficient methods of delivering the cane to the factories must be developed.

This is entirely the fault of the government who should have been aware since 2000 that the workers were migrating away from the industry. In addition, beginning in 2006 the European Union [EU] had started paying the development fund to Guyana which was our compensation for the loss of the preferential price for sugar in the EU markets. The understanding was that this money was supposed to be used to make the industry more efficient and competitive and a substantial part of it should have been used to start the expensive process of converting the land for mechanical harvesting, on all estates, to offset the loss of workers.

This money was never released to GuySuCo and as recently as 2008 in a GuySuCo document called “Revised Commentary on Capital Budget 2008” [two years after the compensation to enhance the efficiency of the corporation had started to flow from the European Union] we see the following “the limited availability of funds in 2007 saw the factory investments limited to less than $350 million instead of the $1.35 Billion requested; and in 2008 the factories asked for $5.6 billion to do their capital works but were only given $2.34 billion, less than half what they needed”. The Board of GuySuCo noted in their summary of the 2008 capital cuts that “this starvation of funds will significantly restrict management’s ability to achieve their objectives outlined in the GuySuCo strategy plans”. There were substantial amounts of compensation paid to Guyana starting from 2006 and between 2006 to 2012 the total amount paid was $24.7 billion but GuySuCo got none of it.

In 2012 GuySuCo finally got a subvention of around 5 billion from the annual budget but the issue remains, today we have a poorly functioning sugar industry which had never received any of the $24.7 Billion Guyana dollars released to the Government of Guyana to rehabilitate and make competitive the Guyana sugar industry and was hijacked by the government to the detriment of the industry and the Guyana cane farmers who were entitled to their share of this money. Robert Persaud, then Minister of Agriculture should explain what was done with this money and why it was not spent where it was supposed to be spent in the sugar industry which, starved as it was for funds, has caused it to collapse in this manner in 2012! Given this government’s propensity for incompetence and corruption the money was clearly wasted on grandiose projects which cannot bring wealth to the nation or its people.

The Skeldon factory still shows signs of being a very bad investment. The factory has been literally throttled [as in strangled] down to grind at a rate of 196 tons cane an hour when in fact it was designed to operate efficiently at 350 tons an hour. The effects of this are apparent in its performance, the tons of cane to make a ton of sugar in 2012 at Skeldon was 16.29 whilst just next door Albion only took 10.52 tons of cane to make a ton of sugar. Skeldon therefore took 64.6% more cane to make a ton of sugar than Albion. One cannot buy and build a 350 ton per hour factory and grind at 196 tons per hour. The mills, the power generation depending on bagasse, the vessels for boiling the juice etc. all are underutilised operating at only around 56% of their rated capacity and must have a very substantial effect on the economics of running this costly and inefficient factory, and it is showing.

Also incredibly at Skeldon the amount of grinding time lost for mechanical reasons at the factory was 550.51 hours. During 2012 the time lost at all the other estate factories for the entire year 2012 was 2130.55 hours. So this brand new alleged state of the art factory accounted for 25% of the total factory downtime in the entire industry! All the other factories combined recorded a total of only 1580 hours.

The total industry production for the year 2012 was 218,069 tons, the lowest in over two decades. The production of the Skeldon factory was a total of 33,309 tons of sugar. Albion for example produced 54,022 tons. By this time, according to all of GuySuCo’s projections, Skeldon should be producing 100,000 tons of sugar. The disaster that is the Skeldon Sugar Modernisation Project [SSMP] continues and the time has come to ask if it is viable? At the very least a commission of enquiry should be set up to examine what has happened? and what is the way forward if in fact there is one.

For example the losses of sugar at the Skeldon factory are frightening. Sugar is haemorrhaging at this state of the art factory in massive quantities, in the filter press mud 1.18% of the sugar is lost, the highest in the industry, Albion for example was 0.51%. In the molasses 17.49% is lost, again the highest in the industry, Albion for example is 9.40%. The undermined losses at Skeldon were 6.45%, again the highest in the industry, Albion for example was only 1.29%. The boiling house recovery was also unacceptably low. The boiling house efficiency was the lowest in the industry at 88.67% whilst Albion was 99.52%, and the industry average was 97.40%.

The field data is equally depressing. The yield per hectare of sugar at Skeldon was 2.81 tons, the lowest in the industry. Albion by comparison yielded 5.35 tons sugar per hectare in 2012, but compared to our recent 30 years average of 2.5 tons per acre or 6.17 tons sugar per hectare, the industry average in 2012 was only 5 tons sugar per hectare. I won’t even try to show how this compares with Brazil and Australia but taken as a total around the planet the normal production average is more like 10 tons sugar per hectare.
All in all a very dismal performance at all estates but especially at Skeldon.

Yours faithfully,
Tony Vieira

I would like the Guysuco Chairman or his Rep to comment before I make any. Well written but is it factual???

Nehru
Originally Posted by Ronald Narain:

Radical Libertarianism: Applying Libertarian Principles
to Dealing with the Unjust Government.

 

THIS IS AN OPTION MANY GUYANESE ARE THINKING ABOUT.


Lika Al YUh 10 in KFC. Even APNU is recognising the Govt efforts.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Ronald Narain:

Radical Libertarianism: Applying Libertarian Principles
to Dealing with the Unjust Government.

 

THIS IS AN OPTION MANY GUYANESE ARE THINKING ABOUT.


Lika Al YUh 10 in KFC. Even APNU is recognising the Govt efforts.

Thanks for confirming.  I always know that the PPP and the PNC is one and doing deals behind the scene.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×