Skip to main content

Govt. agreed to pay Sithe Global interest on money already repaid

August 26, 2013 | By | Filed Under News 

 

 

…firm was also to receive additional US$17M  participation fee – Chris Ram

“Can you imagine any bank in which you deposit $100,000 and then withdraw $90,000 continuing to pay you interest for twenty years on the $100,000?”
According to Financial Analyst, Christopher Ram, this is exactly what the Guyana Government signed onto with Sithe Global for the Hydro Project.
Ram, says too, despite the public statements, when all the transactions are taken into account, “it becomes clear that Sithe planned to invest considerably less in the project than US$150M but would be paid interest as if it did.”

Chartered Accountant and Financial Analyst, Christopher Ram

Chartered Accountant and Financial Analyst, Christopher Ram

He said it was surprising enough to learn that Sithe Global would be receiving a tax-free, 19 per cent return on its investment.  What is worse, according to Ram, was learning that the 19 per cent is paid each year, calculated on the original US$158M sum deemed to have been invested, rather than the reducing balance after each repayment.
He calculated that in the last five years of the project when Sithe’s investment would have been substantially repaid, it would receive interest on the balance of its investment at rates ranging from 76 per cent in year 16, to 380 per cent in year 20.
Ram who has been a fierce critic of the manner in which the project is currently structured, in his latest writings on the Amaila Project said that the public was led to believe that Sithe Global is an equity investor in the project, that is the shareholder who takes the ultimate risk in the company.
In the case of insolvency, the equity is only repaid after all other debts and obligations have been met.
“In fact, Sithe was allowed to design the project documents so that the repayment of its cash and in-kind investment would be effected through the monthly all-in charge to be paid by GPL.”
As such, Ram said, Sithe Global is not an equity shareholder but the holder of redeemable preference shares, enjoying total control of all aspects of the proposed project, the prohibitive price tag of which stands at US$858 million.”
Ram further stated that a closer examination reveals that a not insignificant” part of the US$858M includes payments to, or payments contracted by Sithe. He said that Sithe Global effectively wrote all the project documents – the shareholders’ Term Sheet, the Implementation Agreement, the Power Purchase Agreement and the Assignment of Receivables Agreement.
According to Ram, Sithe Global also insisted on being paid an equity participation fee of 2 per cent of the total project cost which amounts to more than US$17M. “In effect, from Sithe’s point of view, the higher the cost, the higher the fees it would be paid.”
This ‘equity participation fee,’ is separate and distinct from the 19 per cent rate of return already being asked for its equity

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Brassington/Jagdeo/Robert Persaud/Irfan Ally/Ramotar/Luncheon were going to rape the people once more with this project and pump up their foreign bank accounts. Luncheon and the others employ several family members at OP. Thankfully APNU objected. The AFC looked foolish. If they held out on the original position and wait until IDB did their due diligence they would be in better shape politically. Baseman probably would have received a small piece. 

FM

“Can you imagine any bank in which you deposit $100,000 and then withdraw $90,000 continuing to pay you interest for twenty years on the $100,000?”

 

 

 

Ram is being facetious here. There is no comparison between a bank deposit and a third world investment.  

 

My question to him is if this was such a sweet deal, why did Sithe walk away?

This would seem like a dream investment.

FM
Originally Posted by TI:

Ram is being facetious here. There is no comparison between a bank deposit and a third world investment.  

 

My question to him is if this was such a sweet deal, why did Sithe walk away?

 

This would seem like a dream investment.

Ram loves to write, write and .... write.

FM
Originally Posted by TI:

“Can you imagine any bank in which you deposit $100,000 and then withdraw $90,000 continuing to pay you interest for twenty years on the $100,000?”

 

 

 

Ram is being facetious here. There is no comparison between a bank deposit and a third world investment.  

 

My question to him is if this was such a sweet deal, why did Sithe walk away?

This would seem like a dream investment.

......the approved amount by Parliament for the guarantee was less than US$758.0 million and there was no consensus by Parliament endorsing the project unreservedly indicates that the risk exposure was too great for at least one investor who walked away.......

 

sounds familiar?

sachin_05
Originally Posted by TI:

“Can you imagine any bank in which you deposit $100,000 and then withdraw $90,000 continuing to pay you interest for twenty years on the $100,000?”

 

 

 

Ram is being facetious here. There is no comparison between a bank deposit and a third world investment.  

 

My question to him is if this was such a sweet deal, why did Sithe walk away?

This would seem like a dream investment.

 

Sithe walked away because they knew these things would come to light and in the event of a new government there will be political risks. 

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TI:

Ram is being facetious here. There is no comparison between a bank deposit and a third world investment.  

 

My question to him is if this was such a sweet deal, why did Sithe walk away?

 

This would seem like a dream investment.

Ram loves to write, write and .... write.

 

Is that an intelligent contribution? 

FM
Originally Posted by JB:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TI:

Ram is being facetious here. There is no comparison between a bank deposit and a third world investment.  

 

My question to him is if this was such a sweet deal, why did Sithe walk away?

 

This would seem like a dream investment.

Ram loves to write, write and .... write.

 

Is that an intelligent contribution? 

What level of intelligence do you expect from an 80 year old Demented_Guy?

Mars
Originally Posted by JB:

Baseman where would you have deposited Mr Jagdeo's cut of the "equity participation fee"?

According to Ram, Sithe Global also insisted on being paid an equity participation fee of 2 per cent of the total project cost which amounts to more than US$17M. “In effect, from Sithe’s point of view, the higher the cost, the higher the fees it would be paid.”


This ‘equity participation fee,’ is separate and distinct from the 19 per cent rate of return already being asked for its equity.

 

 

 

 

Mitwah
Originally Posted by God:
Originally Posted by JB:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by TI:

Ram is being facetious here. There is no comparison between a bank deposit and a third world investment.  

 

My question to him is if this was such a sweet deal, why did Sithe walk away?

 

This would seem like a dream investment.

Ram loves to write, write and .... write.

 

Is that an intelligent contribution? 

What level of intelligence do you expect from an 80 year old Demented_Guy?

 

He cannot be 80 years old. He does not display wisdom. 

FM

An equity participation fee is not illegal. Certainly there are favorable terms here, but investors look for value. You would be surprised at the caveats involved in private placements transactions.  The issue here is that it was a sweetheart deal. Now if that was the case, why did Sithe walk?

JB said political risk in case the govt changed.  There is always political risk involved in investments in third world countries; that is why the terms are favorable so that was already built into their risk model.

 

Now, there is a simple way to test this. Let the PNC give the go ahead and see Sithe's response.  If they still balk, then it's money issue, given the amended debt ceiling and control factors AFC put forward. 

 

 

FM
Originally Posted by TI:

An equity participation fee is not illegal. Certainly there are favorable terms here, but investors look for value. You would be surprised at the caveats involved in private placements transactions.  The issue here is that it was a sweetheart deal. Now if that was the case, why did Sithe walk?

JB said political risk in case the govt changed.  There is always political risk involved in investments in third world countries; that is why the terms are favorable so that was already built into their risk model.

 

Now, there is a simple way to test this. Let the PNC give the go ahead and see Sithe's response.  If they still balk, then it's money issue, given the amended debt ceiling and control factors AFC put forward. 

 

 

like you have a small peice to collect

FM
Originally Posted by TI:

An equity participation fee is not illegal. Certainly there are favorable terms here, but investors look for value. You would be surprised at the caveats involved in private placements transactions.  The issue here is that it was a sweetheart deal. Now if that was the case, why did Sithe walk?

JB said political risk in case the govt changed.  There is always political risk involved in investments in third world countries; that is why the terms are favorable so that was already built into their risk model.

 

Now, there is a simple way to test this. Let the PNC give the go ahead and see Sithe's response.  If they still balk, then it's money issue, given the amended debt ceiling and control factors AFC put forward. 

 

 

That's not a "simple" way to test the situation. The APNU has made a convincing case why they will not support the project which everyone, including APNU, agrees we need but not in the financing form Brassington/Jagdeo/Ally/Peraud/Ramotar concocted to earn bank money. 

FM
Originally Posted by JB:
Originally Posted by TI:

An equity participation fee is not illegal. Certainly there are favorable terms here, but investors look for value. You would be surprised at the caveats involved in private placements transactions.  The issue here is that it was a sweetheart deal. Now if that was the case, why did Sithe walk?

JB said political risk in case the govt changed.  There is always political risk involved in investments in third world countries; that is why the terms are favorable so that was already built into their risk model.

 

Now, there is a simple way to test this. Let the PNC give the go ahead and see Sithe's response.  If they still balk, then it's money issue, given the amended debt ceiling and control factors AFC put forward. 

 

 

That's not a "simple" way to test the situation. The APNU has made a convincing case why they will not support the project which everyone, including APNU, agrees we need but not in the financing form Brassington/Jagdeo/Ally/Peraud/Ramotar concocted to earn bank money. 

every guyanese know that these thief will be making money on this deal these low life was selling guyanese down the drain

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×