The future of the PPP and PNCR
Dear Editor,
I make a few observations on local party politics:
(1) The PPP party has been short-sightedly trying to stimulate racism in the AFC. The racial poles they are trying to use are Mr. Ramjattan on the one side and Mr. Trotman on the other side.
This is very evident from comments carried in the Guyana Chronicle and the published words of PPP spokesmen. This amateurish propaganda is obviously back-firing as by concentrating their attacks, albeit of a low-grade quality, on the AFC, it clearly sends the unmistakable message that the PPP is more afraid of the AFC than the PNCR.
The PPP and PNCR assumptions that they have a racial vote in the bag as they had 30 or 40 years ago, is false. The PNCR cannot depend on what used to be its racial support and the PPP equally cannot.
The reason why the PPP racial core support voted for that party was not because they thought the PPP had any special virtues, but simply to keep the PNCR out since no one wanted banning of flour or street hooliganism or violence. Now that the PNCR has disintegrated and the fear of the PNCR has gone, PPP racial supporters will largely abstain as they did in their thousands in the last elections, or many would vote for the AFC.
The PPP propagandists and strategists will have to be more creative as they cannot assume a racial support as in times gone by. Are they capable of meeting this challenge?
(2) The PNCR party has disintegrated and the PPP party is fast following the same course of disintegration since both parties had the same genesis and both resemble each other. The PPP’s disintegration is based on a number of factors including:
(a) There are five or six presidential aspirants who each have their own following and they dislike each other. The unity of the Party, on the face of it, is already broken.
(b) None of the presidential aspirants command much support nationally or among PPP supporters as a whole. They all leave the voters unenthused and cold.
(c) The cement of the Jagans has long gone and there is now no personality or ideology holding the Party together. The Party is like a headless chicken.
(d) The Jagans over 50 years built up a country-wide party structure which was efficient in mobilizing its supporters. Now that structure has been neglected and is now almost non-functional.
The level of political mobilization has seriously fallen. The reason why the PPP’s disintegration has not become as evident as the PNCR’s is simply the cracks are papered over because the PPP is the incumbent.
(3) The PPP can only save itself by (i) Dr Jagdeo having another presidential term but this is fiercely attacked and resisted by the presidential aspirants, especially the one who has nominal control of the Party. And then there is the constitutional hurdle which is not insuperable.
But it is unlikely at this time though another term for Dr Jagdeo may give the Country and the PPP a respite and a relief. (ii) The other alternative available to the PPP for saving itself is to remove the choice of its presidential candidate from the 30 members of their General Council and democratizing the process by allowing the membership of the Party to choose the presidential candidate.
If the PPP takes this democratic route, there is hope for its revival and survival. If the Party does not, it is doomed to first, morbidity, and then in a few years, disintegration like the PNCR.
And further I say not.
Pandit P. Ramlall