PPP/C at forefront of 2011 elections PDF Print E-mail
Written by AADITEY PERSAUD
Friday, 07 October 2011 02:21
MR. MAXWELL’s letter titled ‘The PPP is campaigning against two parties dominated by a multiracial leadership for the first time’ on October 6, 2011 published by Stabroek News, shows that he needs to do more homework assignments on the modern politics of the PPP/C. This Maxwell masquerades as a lawyer and a private TV owner, and moonlights as a cheap propagandist for the AFC - a loser by any standards.
How can AFC call themselves a multiracial party when their party only comprises of Indian and Black leaders? And how is APNU any different? As far as I am concerned, Guyana has six races, and to have a party saying that they are multiracial with just two races is nonsensical.
A party should run for an election on the basis of professionalism, and not based on race.
The AFC immature propagandists are doing a terrible job in representing their party’s image. In responding to someone’s letter, they should learn to read it carefully. Apparently, they do not know how to handle constructive criticisms in a professional manner.
In the AFC propagandist’s letter, they are promoting the letter writer’s agenda than to address the issue. If they cannot simply do this, then how can they be leaders of this country?
As a result of the coalition, the PNC’s strong-hold presence has been diminishing slowly, and the WPA-led APNU has no constituency.
Furthermore, there is no competition between the PPP/C and WPA, WPA-led APNU or the AFC, since the PPP/C is way above their level in all matters of politics. Even the AFC propagandists admit that ‘The AFC is a new commodity’ and that ‘the AFC has its own set of problems.’
We don’t need a party where its members called itself the best and they cannot even control their internal problems. As a new commodity without any reputation and track record, it is doomed to fail, easily putting PPP/C in the forefront of this year’s election.
Written by AADITEY PERSAUD
Friday, 07 October 2011 02:21
MR. MAXWELL’s letter titled ‘The PPP is campaigning against two parties dominated by a multiracial leadership for the first time’ on October 6, 2011 published by Stabroek News, shows that he needs to do more homework assignments on the modern politics of the PPP/C. This Maxwell masquerades as a lawyer and a private TV owner, and moonlights as a cheap propagandist for the AFC - a loser by any standards.
How can AFC call themselves a multiracial party when their party only comprises of Indian and Black leaders? And how is APNU any different? As far as I am concerned, Guyana has six races, and to have a party saying that they are multiracial with just two races is nonsensical.
A party should run for an election on the basis of professionalism, and not based on race.
The AFC immature propagandists are doing a terrible job in representing their party’s image. In responding to someone’s letter, they should learn to read it carefully. Apparently, they do not know how to handle constructive criticisms in a professional manner.
In the AFC propagandist’s letter, they are promoting the letter writer’s agenda than to address the issue. If they cannot simply do this, then how can they be leaders of this country?
As a result of the coalition, the PNC’s strong-hold presence has been diminishing slowly, and the WPA-led APNU has no constituency.
Furthermore, there is no competition between the PPP/C and WPA, WPA-led APNU or the AFC, since the PPP/C is way above their level in all matters of politics. Even the AFC propagandists admit that ‘The AFC is a new commodity’ and that ‘the AFC has its own set of problems.’
We don’t need a party where its members called itself the best and they cannot even control their internal problems. As a new commodity without any reputation and track record, it is doomed to fail, easily putting PPP/C in the forefront of this year’s election.
