Skip to main content

Newsletter Banner
 
July 19th, 2013

 

At the Sitting of Parliament on Thursday, July 18, 2013, the Alliance For Change was fully prepared to support the Hydro-Electric Power (Amendment) Bill 2013. This Bill provides for the conservation and preservation of the environment and eco-systems surrounding the hydroelectric resources of Guyana. The AFC supports any rational measure to protect the environment.

A Motion brought by the Government seeking approval to raise the guarantee of loans by public corporations and companies to $150 billion was not going to be supported by the AFC given our concerns that to do so could result in greater debt burden that would eventually have to be borne by taxpayers.

In pledging its support for the Hydroelectric Bill, the AFC sought to ensure that the Government in turn would support the four Local Government Bills which had already passed through Special Select Committee.

The behaviour of the government, in not even speaking on these Bills clearly demonstrated total reluctance on their part to have Local Government Elections.

Despite securing the principled support of the AFC for the Hydroelectric Bill, the PPPC Members of Parliament attempted to force the AFC to support either both the Bill and the Motion, or none at all.

The  'bullyism' and attempt to  dominate the National Assembly by the minority PPPC Government forced the AFC to withhold its support for the Hydroelectric Bill.

The AFC remains committed to clean energy and in this context will await the findings of the IDB feasibility study on the Amaila Hydropower Project. The AFC's support for the Project hinges on the results of the study.

The government's position yesterday clearly indicates that the holding of Local Government Elections; a must for most Guyanese citizens, is not a priority for the PPPC. [END]

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Despite securing the principled support of the AFC for the Hydroelectric Bill, the PPPC Members of Parliament attempted to force the AFC to support either both the Bill and the Motion, or none at all.

The  'bullyism' and attempt to  dominate the National Assembly by the minority PPPC Government forced the AFC to withhold its support for the Hydroelectric Bill.

Mitwah

In reacting to the parliamentary opposition’s vote against two pieces of legislation for the Amaila Falls Project, President Ramotar said, “This is a very dark day for our country.”

The President told this news site that the Opposition – A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) and the Alliance for Change (AFC) is hell bent on opposing development for Guyana and its people.

President Ramotar briefly recalled the Opposition voting against appropriations to keep consumers from feeling the brunt of increased tariffs and for allowing GPL to improve their service.

Government Chief Whip, Gail Teixeira in her contribution to the debate last night told the House the IDB representatives are currently in Guyana, and met with the APNU and AFC on Wednesday evening but that the meeting gave no indication on the position of the opposition on whether they supported the project.

Additionally, Prime Minister Samuel Hinds revealed that the funds which are already committed to the project are in jeopardy, as those monies have a shelf life.

The Prime Minister believes that the Amaila Falls Project has been “greatly wounded” and that it is a sad day for Guyana. The IDB representatives observed the proceedings of the National Assembly yesterday.

FM
Newsletter Banner
 
July 19th, 2013

 

By: Moses Nagamootoo MP

 

The PPP last night threw the Motion on the floor of Parliament to raise the debt that the Government has to guarantee for public corporations and companies from $1 billion to $150 billion, to stalemate any possibility of cooperation between Government and the Opposition, as if the PPP regime had designed a shut-down of the Amaila Hydro Project, and had identified the Opposition as scapegoats.

 

The PPP Government wanted to play hardball with Local Government Elections and shut down debate on the laws that could pave the way for these elections this year, and attempted to blackmail the Opposition that, unless they support Amaila related measures, they would not bring Local Government Bills for approval.

 

When the Opposition sought to place the Local Government Bills up for debate, the Government refused to introduce them, and the Minister of Local Government chose to be the 'dumb-boy', in the Parliament.

 

The AFC was prepared to support, mas we still do, the amendment to the Hydroelectric Power Bill, which we would like to call the "Flora and Fauna" Bill, if only the PPP would proceed with the Local Government Bill and assure their assent. But the PPP insisted that it was "all or nothing" - that we would have to support the other measure to raise the debt ceiling.

 

The AFC has taken a principled position that we would approve all Amaila related laws once the IDB, which is undertaking a technical and other review of the project's feasibility, give the Amaila Project the green light. It would be irresponsible for us to guarantee borrowing to the tune of $150 billion and not have informed guarantee that the project is feasible. And this remains our position. To do otherwise would be to abandon the people of Guyana, and to place them in a vicious trap of future debts.

 

I want to refer to what I said during the 2013 Budget Debate: "Instead of progress, many public corporations are a liability to the people, estimated at some US$281,794,465 or GY$57,204,276,395 (G$57.2 billion) last year. These include the Guyana Power and Light.

 

I was interrupted when I made these disclosures. I had hit the bull's eye!

 

The Hansard shows that first, Ms. Teixeira, wanted to get the source of what she described as "very interesting figures". Then, the Finance Minister, in utter bafflement, wanted me to repeat to repeat the figures and to say what they were about.

 

I said, "it is G$57.2 billion and that is the public corporation liability".

 

It was at that point that I described GPL as a huge black hole, saying that it is "inefficient; it mismanages; it wastes and it squanders".

 

I referred to the $6 billion last year, and the additional $11.2 billion requested this year.

 

As for the other giant state corporation, Guysuco, I pointed out that Government had guaranteed loans in the amount of $29 billion as part of a $47 billion recapitalisation programme, and they are showing nothing for this.

 

So when this government says it wants to raise the amount of liability of the people of Guyana for loans contracted by state corporations and companies from $1billion to $150 billion, this must raise a red flag.

 

The PPP and the PNC would continue to do battle over whose administration borrowed the most: In 1992 the inherited national debt, both external and domestic, in Guyana $ "nominal" amount stood at G$263 billion, most of which was written off. This year, the national debt stands at about $380 billion.

 

We are high on debt, like a drug addict on morphine. We are back in the vicious debt circle, like a dog chasing its own tail. [END]

Mitwah

Moses and the parliamentary opposition have taken a principled approach to PPP/C financial requests. There must be quid pro quo.

With only 49 per representation, the PPP/C wants the majority opposition to support all government measures and proposals without conceding anything to the opposition in return.

Local government elections are important, a purely democratic imperative, but the PPP seems to be avoiding that question for selfish existential reasons.

In the old days when the PPP wore opposition shoes, they rightly criticized the PNC regime for not holding local government since 1970. Why doesn't the PPP/C want such elections now?

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×