Skip to main content

September 2 2018

Source

Leading up to the early general elections in May 2015, the Coalition Government had been vowing to get to the bottom of what it says appeared to be widespread corruption within the administration of the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C).

A few months after taking office, the new administration ordered a number of forensic audits into the operations of state agencies to determine the state of affairs.

The reports raised a number of troubling findings, which the Government said were serious enough to warrant further investigations.

While the police conducted a major one involving over $600M reportedly pilfered from the Public Service Ministry, the other audit files were handed over the police’s Special Organised Crime Unit (SOCU). A number of cases have been sent for legal advice.

With regards to the Public Service Ministry fraud, former minister, Dr. Jennifer Westford, and her assistant, Margaret Cummings, saw their charges in the alleged theft of $639M being dismissed because the court was convinced that the wrong charges were laid.

A number of other cases before the courts, including ones against former Finance Minister, Dr. Ashni Singh, and Winston Brassington, the former Privatisation Head, may be in jeopardy now because of the wrong charges too.

On Friday, President Granger, during his first press conference for the year, was asked about cases in context of the dismissal of the charges.

According to the President, the roles of Government should not be confused with what is taking place in the courts. He insisted that the Ministry of Legal Affairs is not a prosecutorial agency.

Rather, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) is engaged in those prosecutions.

He said that Ministry of Legal Affairs is concerned with public law rather than criminal charges against individuals.

According to the President, the police’s Special Organised Crime Unit (SOCU) and the State Assets Recovery Agency (SARA) have their responsibilities.

Acknowledging that prosecuting a corrupt person is not easy, the Head of State pointed out that a corrupt person or a criminal does not readily leave stolen money lying about, or invoices and vouchers.

Rather, he tries to protect…he tries to conceal the crime, and it is sometimes difficult to trace.

Granger made it clear that his Cabinet of Ministers is under very clear instructions to abide by the rulings of the court as is evident in the last Judicial Review Act.

“Cabinet took a decision that once the court has ruled, they will abide by the ruling of the court.”

Granger also noted that there is no “golden rule” that says that once a case is brought to the court the person will be found guilty.

“So the Minister of Legal Affairs is not a judge… the courts are the judges… the DPP is not the judge, the courts are the judges. The courts are the magistrates. So we have to look there to see where these cases are won and lost.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

They will come up empty, the PPP ain’t that stupid to leave smoking guns.  Wasn’t Chris Ram one of the auditors?  Did he not take Tony Yassin down a rabbit hole?  

The better approach was to go after tax evasion based on wealth accumulation. Follow the money!

FM
Baseman posted:

They will come up empty, the PPP ain’t that stupid to leave smoking guns.  Wasn’t Chris Ram one of the auditors?  Did he not take Tony Yassin down a rabbit hole?  

The better approach was to go after tax evasion based on wealth accumulation. Follow the money!

Bhai,corruption is rooted in the lax accounting in the government system.

Can you imagine some officials in the Regions can't remember if they receive disbursements.

Django
Django posted:
Baseman posted:

They will come up empty, the PPP ain’t that stupid to leave smoking guns.  Wasn’t Chris Ram one of the auditors?  Did he not take Tony Yassin down a rabbit hole?  

The better approach was to go after tax evasion based on wealth accumulation. Follow the money!

Bhai,corruption is rooted in the lax accounting in the government system.

Can you imagine some officials in the Regions can't remember if they receive disbursements.

That’s the way to catch the small fries and give the ”squirrel” moment, as Cain would say!

FM
Django posted:
Baseman posted:

They will come up empty, the PPP ain’t that stupid to leave smoking guns.  Wasn’t Chris Ram one of the auditors?  Did he not take Tony Yassin down a rabbit hole?  

The better approach was to go after tax evasion based on wealth accumulation. Follow the money!

Bhai,corruption is rooted in the lax accounting in the government system.

Can you imagine some officials in the Regions can't remember if they receive disbursements.

Django, the management style of councillors is politically influence.

Some councillors have no clue when money is disburse by government to these offices. 

This is not a full time job by councillors. If they missed a meeting, they don’t give a damn what transpire hence the reason why some claimed they don’t know if money was received by their offices. 

FM

“Granger made it clear that his Cabinet of Ministers is under very clear instructions to abide by the rulings of the court as is evident in the last Judicial Review Act.

“Cabinet took a decision that once the court has ruled, they will abide by the ruling of the court.”

 

why did Junior Minister Jaipaul say last week the government will appeal the Webster case. 

Was this minister absent from cabinet meeting when this decision was taken 

Django, this situation is an example of councillors claim they didn’t know if money was receive by their office. 

In this particular reference, it’s a minister. 

FM

Why did the coalition government used its one seat advantage in parliament, to turn down a motion table by PPP for all ministers to declare their asset both local and foreign including taxable income. 

FM
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Baseman posted:

They will come up empty, the PPP ain’t that stupid to leave smoking guns.  Wasn’t Chris Ram one of the auditors?  Did he not take Tony Yassin down a rabbit hole?  

The better approach was to go after tax evasion based on wealth accumulation. Follow the money!

Bhai,corruption is rooted in the lax accounting in the government system.

Can you imagine some officials in the Regions can't remember if they receive disbursements.

Django, the management style of councillors is politically influence.

Some councillors have no clue when money is disburse by government to these offices. 

This is not a full time job by councillors. If they missed a meeting, they don’t give a damn what transpire hence the reason why some claimed they don’t know if money was received by their offices. 

Suh no meeting are set to review financial statements.I guess everyone wants to be tap daag and don't have a clue how to manage local gov't.

Django
Dave posted:

Why did the coalition government used its one seat advantage in parliament, to turn down a motion table by PPP for all ministers to declare their asset both local and foreign including taxable income. 

You r@ss asking too much questions,send a letter to Granger.

Django
Dave posted:

“Granger made it clear that his Cabinet of Ministers is under very clear instructions to abide by the rulings of the court as is evident in the last Judicial Review Act.

“Cabinet took a decision that once the court has ruled, they will abide by the ruling of the court.”

 why did Junior Minister Jaipaul say last week the government will appeal the Webster case. 

You know there are more than one Court,so the case can be appealed.

Django
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Baseman posted:

They will come up empty, the PPP ain’t that stupid to leave smoking guns.  Wasn’t Chris Ram one of the auditors?  Did he not take Tony Yassin down a rabbit hole?  

The better approach was to go after tax evasion based on wealth accumulation. Follow the money!

Bhai,corruption is rooted in the lax accounting in the government system.

Can you imagine some officials in the Regions can't remember if they receive disbursements.

Django, the management style of councillors is politically influence.

Some councillors have no clue when money is disburse by government to these offices. 

This is not a full time job by councillors. If they missed a meeting, they don’t give a damn what transpire hence the reason why some claimed they don’t know if money was received by their offices. 

Suh no meeting are set to review financial statements.I guess everyone wants to be tap daag and don't have a clue how to manage local gov't.

Of course there is meeting. 

The fit and proper way to say it “ The Government has no clue how to manage a country “

 

FM
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Baseman posted:

They will come up empty, the PPP ain’t that stupid to leave smoking guns.  Wasn’t Chris Ram one of the auditors?  Did he not take Tony Yassin down a rabbit hole?  

The better approach was to go after tax evasion based on wealth accumulation. Follow the money!

Bhai,corruption is rooted in the lax accounting in the government system.

Can you imagine some officials in the Regions can't remember if they receive disbursements.

Django, the management style of councillors is politically influence.

Some councillors have no clue when money is disburse by government to these offices. 

This is not a full time job by councillors. If they missed a meeting, they don’t give a damn what transpire hence the reason why some claimed they don’t know if money was received by their offices. 

Suh no meeting are set to review financial statements.I guess everyone wants to be tap daag and don't have a clue how to manage local gov't.

Of course there is meeting. 

The fit and proper way to say it “ The Government has no clue how to manage a country “

 

Well you know Government are Central,Regional and Local.

Which one doan have no clue ?

Django
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Baseman posted:

They will come up empty, the PPP ain’t that stupid to leave smoking guns.  Wasn’t Chris Ram one of the auditors?  Did he not take Tony Yassin down a rabbit hole?  

The better approach was to go after tax evasion based on wealth accumulation. Follow the money!

Bhai,corruption is rooted in the lax accounting in the government system.

Can you imagine some officials in the Regions can't remember if they receive disbursements.

Django, the management style of councillors is politically influence.

Some councillors have no clue when money is disburse by government to these offices. 

This is not a full time job by councillors. If they missed a meeting, they don’t give a damn what transpire hence the reason why some claimed they don’t know if money was received by their offices. 

Suh no meeting are set to review financial statements.I guess everyone wants to be tap daag and don't have a clue how to manage local gov't.

Of course there is meeting. 

The fit and proper way to say it “ The Government has no clue how to manage a country “

 

Well you know Government are Central,Regional and Local.

Which one doan have no clue ?

Recently you have been fishing around for information Congress boy. 

852DBEF8-8A10-4326-9D2E-204AC98CAD85

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 852DBEF8-8A10-4326-9D2E-204AC98CAD85
FM
Baseman posted:

They will come up empty, the PPP ain’t that stupid to leave smoking guns.  Wasn’t Chris Ram one of the auditors?  Did he not take Tony Yassin down a rabbit hole?  

The better approach was to go after tax evasion based on wealth accumulation. Follow the money!

The only way to shake down any corrupt politician is to pursue tax evasion. Money has a trail but the PNC lacks the ability and resources to do so.

They are barking up the wrong tree with SOCU and SARA.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×