Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

 

The protest in full swing

 

Who is the Minister Now....

and who is de Monkey????

 

Former Local Government Minister Kellawan Lall

(centre) at the protest

Some of them

Downing dem Head in Shame

Charles Ramson Jr holding a placard

Charles Ramson Jr

Now....Where is De Rat?

Bobby Ramroop?

Raj Singh?

Brassington?

Former Housing Minister Irfaan Ali speaking to a reporter during the demonstration

Former Housing Minister Irfan Ali

Telling the Reporter

"Following Rat was a mistake"

Where is Kit Nascimento?

Former Culture Minister Dr Frank Anthony calling for the GECOM Chairman to go

 

Former Culture & Sports Minister Dr Frank Anthony

Why Beri Beri is not here Now?

Where is Lamumba?

Former Minister of Public Works Robeson Benn protesting

Former Public Works Minister Robenson Benn

Ah Hope This do not mess up

De Diamond $muggleing Deal

Where is Norman McClean?

Former Prime Minister Sam Hinds with his placard

Former Prime Minister Sam Hinds

I tell them I Retire

But them say .....

I got to go in De Cage

Where is Elizabeth Harper?

Where is Phalorie Joe?

PPP General Secretary Clement Rohee was seen picketing in front of the Gecom headquarters yesterday with other party members. [Photo by Arian Browne)

 

PPP General Secretary Clement Rohee...

I tell de Police Officer

I was yuh Boss..

 

De Police Man tell me

Ramjattan say....

 

Tell De Goat

Haul he ass in de Cage

with de others....

 

Why is Philip Bynoe not here?

Former Local Government Minister Ganga Persaud bearing a placard with a PPP slogan from the 1968 elections.

 

Former Local Govt Minister Ganga Persaud

& De Gold Teeth Minister

Look she cant Close she mouth...

 

Ah Tell aya na... Cuss Moses

 

He mek Ramjattan ......

Put all abee in a Cage

like Monkey....

 

Why Kwame & Luncheon

Laughing Now???

 

 

May 11th Magic

Minista turn Monkey

 

 

 

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Mitwah,
Read this, instead of doing AFC propaganda. You might learn something brother.
 
 
 
Even before the final results of the May 11 elections were announced by GECOM, the  PPPC had questioned the Preliminary count. There was a gap of only 5000 votes between the PPPC and APNU/AFC. Pointing to discrepancies in the numbers between their SOP's and that announced by GECOM from 22 boxes, the PPPC asked for a recount of those boxes. They said the Chairman of GECOM agreed. It seemed a reasonable response - how long would a count take??  Especially since the PPPC said they'd accept the entire results if the minuscule recount showed no discrepancy.
But then lo and behold, there was no recount and the "final" result - which saw some small additions to both parties totals but retained the 5000 votes in favour of APNU/AFC - was declared. The APNU/AFC, according to GECOm and the International Observers had "won". What was the PPP to do?? Well they had the precedent of the PNCR back in 1997. Then, even though there was a gap of 40,000 votes in favour of the PPPC, the PNCR claimed there was "rigging" and demanded a recount.
But it didn't only do that. It came out with supporters in the streets in violent protests and presented the PPP from governing even though all the international observers had also vouche for  the elections. Eventually, CariCom was called in and the "Herdmanson Accord" was brokered between the PPPC and the PNCR. There would be a "forensic audit" of all ballots, constitutional reform, and a truncation of the PPP's term of office by two years.
In the present, with a much better case for a recount, the PPPC has thankfully not called out its supporters in violent protests. All they have done is to direct their peacefully protests to GECOM at its national HQ in Georgetown and in the region's calling for a recount and a resignation of GECOM's chairman. 
It doesn't appear that the protests are having any effect and we hope that the PPPC doesn't feel compelled to follow the PNCR's precedent. Guyana suffered too much in the ten-year war that followed - which had armed gunmen in Buxton taking on the state and individuals deemed to be "supporters of the PPPC". If this was done for a 40,000 gap, it's quite possible that even "non-hot heads" might be roused to radical action for a contested 5000 gap.
This Eyewitness believes that all those countries that have professed to have Guyana's interest at heart must prevail on GECOM to allow an internationally vetted "Forensic Audit" to be done to the results.
If we go by the PNCR's 1997 actions, not to do so could place Guyana back on the precipice. 
V

Even before the final results of the May 11 elections were announced by GECOM, the  PPPC had questioned the Preliminary count. There was a gap of only 5000 votes between the PPPC and APNU/AFC. Pointing to discrepancies in the numbers between their SOP's and that announced by GECOM from 22 boxes, the PPPC asked for a recount of those boxes. They said the Chairman of GECOM agreed. It seemed a reasonable response - how long would a count take??  Especially since the PPPC said they'd accept the entire results if the minuscule recount showed no discrepancy.

 But then lo and behold, there was no recount and the "final" result - which saw some small additions to both parties totals but retained the 5000 votes in favour of APNU/AFC - was declared. The APNU/AFC, according to GECOm and the International Observers had "won". What was the PPP to do?? Well they had the precedent of the PNCR back in 1997. Then, even though there was a gap of 40,000 votes in favour of the PPPC, the PNCR claimed there was "rigging" and demanded a recount.

 But it didn't only do that. It came out with supporters in the streets in violent protests and presented the PPP from governing even though all the international observers had also vouche for  the elections. Eventually, CariCom was called in and the "Herdmanson Accord" was brokered between the PPPC and the PNCR. There would be a "forensic audit" of all ballots, constitutional reform, and a truncation of the PPP's term of office by two years.

 In the present, with a much better case for a recount, the PPPC has thankfully not called out its supporters in violent protests. All they have done is to direct their peacefully protests to GECOM at its national HQ in Georgetown and in the region's calling for a recount and a resignation of GECOM's chairman. 

 It doesn't appear that the protests are having any effect and we hope that the PPPC doesn't feel compelled to follow the PNCR's precedent. Guyana suffered too much in the ten-year war that followed - which had armed gunmen in Buxton taking on the state and individuals deemed to be "supporters of the PPPC". If this was done for a 40,000 gap, it's quite possible that even "non-hot heads" might be roused to radical action for a contested 5000 gap.

 This Eyewitness believes that all those countries that have professed to have Guyana's interest at heart must prevail on GECOM to allow an internationally vetted "Forensic Audit" to be done to the results.

 If we go by the PNCR's 1997 actions, not to do so could place Guyana back on the precipice. 

V
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by VishMahabir:

i am guessing they are planning on how the restructure the PPP.

Laad Gaad, you just accuse me and HMR that we are guessing.

Not only that. You posted AFC propaganda and he posted PPP propaganda. Do fo do nah obeah.

For a newbee, he came out with blazing guns and shot himself in the foot.

 I think, I 'll ease up on him.

Mitwah

Even before the final results of the May 11 elections were announced by GECOM, the  PPPC had questioned the Preliminary count. There was a gap of only 5000 votes between the PPPC and APNU/AFC. Pointing to discrepancies in the numbers between their SOP's and that announced by GECOM from 22 boxes, the PPPC asked for a recount of those boxes. They said the Chairman of GECOM agreed. It seemed a reasonable response - how long would a count take??  Especially since the PPPC said they'd accept the entire results if the minuscule recount showed no discrepancy.

 But then lo and behold, there was no recount and the "final" result - which saw some small additions to both parties totals but retained the 5000 votes in favour of APNU/AFC - was declared. The APNU/AFC, according to GECOm and the International Observers had "won". What was the PPP to do?? Well they had the precedent of the PNCR back in 1997. Then, even though there was a gap of 40,000 votes in favour of the PPPC, the PNCR claimed there was "rigging" and demanded a recount.

 But it didn't only do that. It came out with supporters in the streets in violent protests and presented the PPP from governing even though all the international observers had also vouche for  the elections. Eventually, CariCom was called in and the "Herdmanson Accord" was brokered between the PPPC and the PNCR. There would be a "forensic audit" of all ballots, constitutional reform, and a truncation of the PPP's term of office by two years.

 In the present, with a much better case for a recount, the PPPC has thankfully not called out its supporters in violent protests. All they have done is to direct their peacefully protests to GECOM at its national HQ in Georgetown and in the region's calling for a recount and a resignation of GECOM's chairman. 

 It doesn't appear that the protests are having any effect and we hope that the PPPC doesn't feel compelled to follow the PNCR's precedent. Guyana suffered too much in the ten-year war that followed - which had armed gunmen in Buxton taking on the state and individuals deemed to be "supporters of the PPPC". If this was done for a 40,000 gap, it's quite possible that even "non-hot heads" might be roused to radical action for a contested 5000 gap.

 This Eyewitness believes that all those countries that have professed to have Guyana's interest at heart must prevail on GECOM to allow an internationally vetted "Forensic Audit" to be done to the results.

 If we go by the PNCR's 1997 actions, not to do so could place Guyana back on the precipice. 

V
Originally Posted by VishMahabir:

this sound like propaganda??

Ok! Let me help you out here. Any 5th grader will tell you what is propaganda.

 

1. The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause.
2. Material disseminated by the advocates or opponents of a doctrine or cause
Mitwah
Originally Posted by VishMahabir:

this sound like propaganda??

https://guyana.crowdstack.io/topic/ok...le-electoral-process

 

In a statement out of the Washington Headquarters, Deputy Spokesperson for the State Department,  Marie Harf said

the US government commends

“the Guyana Elections Commission for conducting a free, fair, and credible electoral process.”

 

She said moving forward,

the US government urges all parties and their supporters to work together to focus their collective efforts on addressing the issues that are important to the Guyanese people, including economic development, citizen security, broader social inclusion, and the protection and effective management of the nation’s vast resources. ...

 

“We also look forward to supporting President Granger’s efforts to promote inclusive governance and national development”, the State Department spokesperson said.

IT'S TIME

TO MOVE ON....

WE DO NOT NEED TO.... DISCUSS ANY JIHAJI OR GAOTSHIT INTERPITATION

OR ANY NEGATIVE VIEWS....

 

US State Department commends GECOM on Free, Fair and Credible Elections

In a statement out of the Washington Headquarters, Deputy Spokesperson for the State Department,  Marie Harf said the US government commends "the Guyana Elections Commission for conducting a free, fair, and credible electoral process."

US State Department commends GECOM on Free, Fair and Credible Elections

Even as the ousted People’s Progressive Party is calling for a total recount and has declared that the recent national elections were fraudulent, the State Department of the United States has offered congratulations to the Guyana Elections Commission for hosting elections that were “free, fair and credible”.

In a statement out of the Washington Headquarters, Deputy Spokesperson for the State Department,  Marie Harf said the US government commends “the Guyana Elections Commission for conducting a free, fair, and credible electoral process.”

She said moving forward, the US government urges all parties and their supporters to work together to focus their collective efforts on addressing the issues that are important to the Guyanese people, including economic development, citizen security, broader social inclusion, and the protection and effective management of the nation’s vast resources.

The US government reiterated earlier statements from the local embassy that it is looking forward to working with newly-elected President David Granger and all those who were also elected to office.  

 
Marie-Harf

U.S State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf

“We also look forward to supporting President Granger’s efforts to promote inclusive governance and national development”, the State Department spokesperson said. 

 The US State Department has also extended its appreciation to former President Donald Ramotar and the members of his government for their service to the people of Guyana.

The State Department said President Ramotar is to be congratulated for the numerous achievements that his government made under his leadership.

The US, British and Canadian missions in Guyana have all declared that the elections were free, fair and credible. The Observer groups which overlooked the elections also offered the same assessment.

Poor PPP

The People’s Progressive Party is however convinced that they may have all gotten it wrong and in a statement on Tuesday night, the PPP said the international community and the observers were all “duped” into believing that the elections were free and fair.

The PPP intends to file an elections petition to challenge the outcome of the elections.

FM
Last edited by Former Member

“As to the merits of the assertions being made by the protesters, international observers were present throughout all stages of Guyana’s recent electoral process including the tabulation and verification of the preliminary and final results.  International observers were in regular contact with contesting political parties and evaluated such political parties’ concerns as part of their assessments of the process,” said Hunt.

The US Charge also pointed out that in the final analysis, international observer missions found the polling, counting, verification, and tabulation processes to be free, fair, and credible. ... “All of Guyana’s political leaders should now shift their focus from political campaigning to governing and find ways to work together to advance the social and economic development of all Guyanese,” said Hunt.

 

Bryan Hunt, Charge d' Affaires, US Embassy

“Respect the outcome of the democratic process” – US Envoy

 
FM
Last edited by Former Member
10982835_1435300333439822_4906108857447214597_o

Harmon rubbishes “oil for win claims” by PPP

 
FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×