Skip to main content

Red House intact
Red House intact
Red House intact

– chief justice shot down Granger’s revocation of lease

CHIEF Justice (ag) Roxanne George-Wiltshire, on Friday, ruled that the revocation of the lease for the Cheddi Jagan Research Inc (CJRI), known as “Red House” by then President, David Granger, was illegal.

The proceedings were filed by Attorney, Mohabir Anil Nandlall, after Mr Granger ordered, on December 29, 2016, that the lease for the building be revoked and the occupants vacate the property before December 31, 2016.

As a result, a group of staff from the then Ministry of the Presidency descended onto the building and attempted to take possession of it.
On December 30, 2016, an order was made by the then Chief Justice, Yonette Cummings-Edwards preserving the occupation of the CJRI until the hearing and determination of the case.

The court has since issued a permanent conservatory order against the defendants not to remove items of the Cheddi Jagan Research Centre unless compensation is made, while the court did not award any constitutional relief because the Conservatory Orders granted were adequate.

Flashback: Senior People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) leaders Neil Kumar; Irfaan Ali (now President); former Attorney-General, Anil Nandlall; former Public Works Minister, Robeson Benn and former President Bharrat Jagdeo protesting the revocation of the Red House lease

In the Writ of Summons filed, the CJRI through its attorney, Nandlall, claimed a number of reliefs, including that its 99 years lease, from January 1, 2012, from the Guyana Lands and Surveys Commission, is binding and in force and that the purported revocation by President Granger was illegal, unlawful, and contrary to the plaintiff’s fundamental rights and freedom not to be unlawfully deprived of its property, guaranteed by Article 142 of the Constitution of the Cooperative Republic of Guyana.

The then Attorney-General, Basil Williams, appeared for the respondents. After the relevant affidavits were filed, written legal submissions were ordered and done in 2018. The matter then awaited ruling.

On Friday, Chief Justice George ruled in favour of the applicant/plaintiff, Cheddi Jagan Research Inc. and awarded costs against the respondents in the sum of $150,000.
In upholding Nandlall’s submissions, the court noted that the ‘Red House’ was vested in the National Trust, the centre was not properly registered in accordance with section 15 of the National Trust Act and as such could not be categorised as a National Monument.

Further, the court accepted the word of former President, Donald Ramotar, that the lease was granted by him, and as such, the lease was not properly revoked by the then President, David Granger, and could only have been revoked for cause. There was no evidence as to the breach of the lease by the lessee.

Additionally, the court underscored that the lease for 99 years was created property and could not be easily terminated, and as a consequence created property under the Constitution.

https://guyanachronicle.com/20...16/red-house-intact/

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@kp posted:
Red House intact
Red House intact
Red House intact

– chief justice shot down Granger’s revocation of lease

CHIEF Justice (ag) Roxanne George-Wiltshire, on Friday, ruled that the revocation of the lease for the Cheddi Jagan Research Inc (CJRI), known as “Red House” by then President, David Granger, was illegal.

Additionally, the court underscored that the lease for 99 years was created property and could not be easily terminated, and as a consequence created property under the Constitution.

https://guyanachronicle.com/20...16/red-house-intact/

As is should be for the maintenance of "Red House".

FM

Who cares about how Cheddie would have done things.  This is the Irfaan era and many more changes will come that you may not be happy about. 

WHEN YOU GOING BACK TO ENJOY PARADISE?

FM

Who cares about how Cheddie would have done things.  This is the Irfaan era and many more changes will come that you may not be happy about. 

I care about Cheddi's principles.  He was a honest man who cared about others.  It is a tragedy that his party is now in the hands of people like Irfaan Ali and Bharrat Jagdeo.  They are the polar opposite of his honesty.   

T
@Totaram posted:

I care about Cheddi's principles.  He was a honest man who cared about others.  It is a tragedy that his party is now in the hands of people like Irfaan Ali and Bharrat Jagdeo.  They are the polar opposite of his honesty.   

When you renounce your membership with the coalition then I would say that you have taken one step toward honoring the memory and ideals of Dr. Cheddie B. Jagan.  For now, I treat you as the enemy of the Guyanese people.

Billy Ram Balgobin
@Former Member posted:

Not according to the Chief Justice bai and she really knows the law.

 Django does cuss and fuss for the PNC without thinking if they are right or wrong.  If you expect truth and objectivity from him you are wasting your time. 

Billy Ram Balgobin
Last edited by Django
@Former Member posted:

Not according to the Chief Justice bai and she really knows the law.

Everyone knows a lease can't be revoked easily. The crux of the matter of the 99 year lease issued under the PPP government ,is it ethical ?

Django

When you renounce your membership with the coalition then I would say that you have taken one step toward honoring the memory and ideals of Dr. Cheddie B. Jagan.  For now, I treat you as the enemy of the Guyanese people.

You can't decide who is a friend or enemy of the Guyanese people.  I knew and worked with and for Dr. Jagan and I am absolutely certain he would not have approved of the actions of his political heirs regarding Red House and a host of other issues.  

T

 Django does cuss and fuss for the PNC without thinking if they are right or wrong.  If you expect truth and objectivity from him you are wasting your time. 

Django ,have great pity for you bhai Billy ,some day you will learn.

Django
@Django posted:

Everyone knows a lease can't be revoked easily. The crux of the matter of the 99 year lease issued under the PPP government ,is it ethical ?

Yes. What was not ethical was the Coalition strongman and now ruled illegal move to seize it.

FM
@Django posted:

Quite a deflection from the crux of the matter .

What deflection? I answered your question directly. Not like your 'effective' answer to my question yesterday. Or was it the day before?

FM
@Former Member posted:

What deflection? I answered your question directly. Not like your 'effective' answer to my question yesterday. Or was it the day before?

It's quite an exemplary school of thoughts .

Django
Last edited by Django
@Django posted:

It's quite an exemplary school of thoughts .

You asked me if I think the 99 years lease was ethical and I responded Yes. That is as direct as an answer can be bai. Lawyers beg for direct answers like that in court.

FM
@Former Member posted:

You asked me if I think the 99 years lease was ethical and I responded Yes.

That is as direct as an answer can be bai. Lawyers beg for direct answers like that in court.

Good for you ,hence my remarks of "the exemplary school of thoughts"

Nothing to do with lawyers and Courts.

Django
@Totaram posted:

You can't decide who is a friend or enemy of the Guyanese people.  I knew and worked with and for Dr. Jagan and I am absolutely certain he would not have approved of the actions of his political heirs regarding Red House and a host of other issues.  

DR. & MRS. J VISiTED MY AREA SHORTLY BEFORE THEIR DEATHS. WE HELD A GET TOGETHER FOR THEM AND I HAVE THE PHOTOS IN MY HOME. HE SPOKE HIGHLY OF A TOTARAM  

FM
@Django posted:

The State Property is leased to the PPP  for 99 yrs under the PPP government.

Public Museum doesn't justify taking the property from the Guyanese people.

It is no different the PNC gave away Wales land.

K
@Former Member posted:

DR. & MRS. J VISiTED MY AREA SHORTLY BEFORE THEIR DEATHS. WE HELD A GET TOGETHER FOR THEM AND I HAVE THE PHOTOS IN MY HOME. HE SPOKE HIGHLY OF A TOTARAM  

Not one dog name Pompey.

K
@kp posted:

Anyway, that lease will be terminated. Productive purposes, try being Funny, come again.

Yep Frontman can take it back ,Guyana was willed to him. Yes the land was leased for productive purposes ,if known otherwise ,feel free to present.

Django
Last edited by Django

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×