Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

This is a foregone conclusion. The votes of individual stations were tabulated, statement of polls signed and delivered to t he various parties. With each polling station having less than 3 hundred to count there cannot be great errors.

Even a kid can count 300 things and parcel them out by the 10 or so competing parties. These individual Statement of Polls are in the hands of the parties.

What is being done now was incidental checking and deviations are highly improbable. This is not about overcoming but verifying the people on the ground counted well. The difference in the count is what the are trying to find out. I have not seen the totals in t he SOPs but It is over 10,000. The APNU is trying to plug that hole by claiming miscounts that accrue to that number. 

FM
  • Django:
 
That is jumbie statistics. We are looking for a plausible sigma rate and this is asking the impossible. We have the numbers, we know the number of polling stations and we know the count per station.
The problem here is we also have the actual votes! This is statistically impossible to over come. They cannot cheat either  because one can find those polling places where there is a difference and actual spot verify.Actually you can verify them all since it would not be difficult.
I assure you the claim cannot be miscount. I guarantee you that the APNU will make some outlandish claims as the PPP had ghost voters. They cannot use this available data they are to overcome their loss. No one will believe them the people in this region were that careless
FM
Last edited by Former Member

Django:

I do not know the number. But that is verifiable from the various parties competing who would each have a signed SOPs and independently validate the numbers. The international observer community will also know that

FM
Last edited by Former Member
×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×