Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Report warns of negative impacts of hydro dams in Amazon basin… Bankers, contractors will hog benefits

May 7, 2014, By Filed Under News, Source

 

A new report has indicated that a staggering 400-plus hydro-power dams will be built in the Amazon basin, including two planned for Guyana.  It would potentially lead to the “end of free-flowing rivers” and contribute to “ecosystem collapse”, causing huge social problems.


The report also warned that the majority of the benefits derived from the construction of mega- projects directly go to actors, including multi-national corporations and the financing institutions.

 

The construction of hydro-electric dams in the Amazon Basin will have negative effects on the area, a Brazilian university anthropologist has warned.

The construction of hydro-electric dams in the Amazon Basin will have negative effects on the area, a Brazilian university anthropologist has warned.

 

Of the 412 dams already in operation, under construction or proposed, 256 are in Brazil, 77 in Peru, 55 in Ecuador, 14 in Bolivia, six in Venezuela, two planned in Guyana, and one each in Colombia, French Guiana and Suriname.


Brazilian Anthropologist, Paul Little, at the launch of the English version of his report, “Mega-Development Projects in Amazonia: A Geo-Political and Socio-Environmental Primer”, said that 151 of the 412 dams involve five of the six main rivers that drain into the Amazon after birthing in the Andes. The report was launched by the Brazilian in Lima, Peru, late last month. Little is attached to the Department of Anthropology, University of Brasilia, Brazil.


“The construction of many large-scale dams in the vast headwaters region of the Amazon Basin – encompassing parts of Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador and Colombia – will produce critical changes in continental water flows, with little knowledge of the ecological consequences of this policy,” the report states.


“This new wave of dam building in the headwaters of the Basin is a “hydrological experiment” of continental proportions, yet little is known scientifically of pan-Amazonian hydrological dynamics, creating the risk of provoking irreversible changes in rivers.”


The report, co-authored and circulated by Peruvian NGO DAR, divides “mega-development projects” into two kinds – infrastructure, such as the transport and electricity sectors, which in turn includes hydroelectric dams; and extractive, such as oil, gas and mining.


According to a report yesterday in www.guardian.com, the focus is on the number of current projects, the larger global financial, regional and geopolitical contexts, and the potential social and environmental impacts.


“The weight of these socio-environmental impacts is distributed in an extremely unequal manner. The majority of the benefits derived from the construction of mega-development projects accrue to economic and political actors external to Amazonia, such as large multi-national corporations, the administrative apparatus of national governments and financial institutions.”


The report also warned that the majority of negative impacts of these same mega-development projects are borne by indigenous peoples, who suffer from the invasion of their territories, and local communities, which suffer from the proliferation of serious social and health problems.


A section of the report makes recommendation to what can be done to counter such projects and the impacts they may have, and includes proposals for a “pan-Amazonian agenda for an alternative model of development.”


According to Little, 1.6 million square kilometres of the Amazon is covered by mining concessions with 1.1M set for oil and gas concessions.
The Amazon rainforest spans 5.5M square kilometres (2.1M square miles) and includes territories belonging to nine nations.


The majority of the forest is contained within Brazil, with 60% of the rainforest, followed by Peru with 13%, Colombia with 10%, and with minor amounts in Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana.


Guyana is currently pursuing building a 165-megawatts facility at Amaila Falls, Region Eight. The project ran into problems last year after the National Assembly remained divided on how the US$850M-plus would be spent. It would be the largest ever infrastructural project for Guyana, if financing is found and given the requisite approval.


Talks are still ongoing with the financiers, Chinese contractor, and US developer on that project.


Talks are also continuing with neighbouring Brazil to build a hydro-electric dam in the Lower Mazaruni, Region Seven. Brazil would be taking a significant portion of the power with the rest being introduced to the Guyana system.


Guyana has been desperately seeking alternative power with its import oil bill continuing to account for a huge chunk of its foreign spending.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Guyana needs an adequate hydro system that can process crude. Crude bought from Nigeria. The processed fuel to be used for its generating plants. Giving the country some breathing space to contemplate and development of Alternative Sources of Power Generation. 

S

In time Guyana will indeed benefit from the development of a hydroelectric power project.

 

Similar to the many others, Paul Little, the Brazilian Anthropologist, simple writing academic articles on the what ifs and grossly neglecting the benefits to each country which pursue these projects.

FM
Originally Posted by seignet:

Guyana needs an adequate hydro system that can process crude. Crude bought from Nigeria. The processed fuel to be used for its generating plants. Giving the country some breathing space to contemplate and development of Alternative Sources of Power Generation. 


My friend do you know about processing Crude????? In the Caribbean there are many facilities currently processing Crude and Going out of business. Many Refineries and oil Terminals were closed in Puerto Rico, Hess Just pulled out of St Lucia, Suriname and Curaco is struggling, Venezuela is currently a disaster, Trinidad is the only one in the region doing good because of their Natural Gas. Guyana need to live good with America.....and hope and pry they discover oil ....and develop it soon.......In the mean while concentrate on developing it's agriculture base.....get out of the Narco Business....and stop hoping for those Pie-in-de-sky Projects they keep dreaming about.
FM
Originally Posted by seignet:

Suh when dem find oil, wah happen then? We going to be like Nigeria, ship the crude to somebody else and pay through our noses for the finished product back to us. 


If we find oil....then we talk about building a refinery. Do not build another Sanata Textile Mill, Glass Factory, Clay Brick Factory, GRL, Bicycle Factory, Ham & Bacon Factory or Radio Factory....and depend on others to supply Machinery, Technology, Management, Money or Raw Material to operate these plants. TODAY THE COST OF TRANSPORTING CRUDE OIL IS TOO EXPENSIVE......THATS WHY ALL THESE SMALL REFINERIES & TERMINALS IN THE CARIBBEAN ARE CLOSING.
FM

Almost every Asian country have oil refineries-some large and some micro. That is the key to progress-cheap power. Places like Vietnam, have rebuilt their economies in very short space of time just by having cheap energy.  

S

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×