Please register early to join this workshop
Attachments
Files (1)
The Federal Court of Appeal has denied the application for a stay of the Federal Court ruling in favour of Zunera Ishaq, clearing the way for her to wear a niqab during a citizenship ceremony.
Regulations have banned wearing of face veils at citizenship ceremonies, but Ishaq challenged the rule and won in Federal Court. On Sept. 18, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld that decision in a quick ruling from the bench. The federal government had sought a stay of the ruling and said it intended to appeal to the Supreme Court.
"I am pleased that the courts have reaffirmed my right to citizenship and to vote," said Ishaq in a written statement issued to CBC News through the law firm of Waldman & Associates.
- Baloney Meter: Is niqab ban needed to prove citizenship applicant's ID?
- ANALYSIS | Charter of Rights and the niqab collide in views on 'Canadian values'
- ANALYSIS | The niqab debate, let's not forget, is about individual rights
"I am disappointed with the government's focus on my individual case when there is so much more that merits the attention of Canadians at this time," Ishaq said. "I'm also disappointed that Mr. Harper continually twists the facts of my case for his gain.
"I wish to confirm that I will be identified without my veil for the purposes of the ceremony. This has nothing to do with identity and everything to do with my right â and the right of all Canadians â to think, believe and dress without government interference," she said.
Before reciting the oath, would-be Canadians are required to provide multiple proofs of identity. Those who wear face coverings must remove them before the ceremony in private before a citizenship official.
Ishaq is one of two women who have refused to unveil before taking the citizenship oath since the Conservatives introduced the policy directive in 2011.
Conservatives 'disappointed'
Conservative Party spokesman Chris McCluskey told CBC News in an email, "We are disappointed in the court's decision, especially as we were waiting on the Supreme Court to hear our appeal.
"We have committed to rectifying this matter going forward by introducing legislation that will require one to show their face while swearing the oath of citizenship. Legislation will be introduced within the first 100 days of a re-elected Conservative government."
"At this point, the Federal Court of Appeal has made a clear statement that there's no basis to grant them a stay, that they upheld their previous ruling that this case has nothing to do with the niqab," said Lorne Waldman, Ishaq's lawyer, in a telephone interview with CBC News.
"It's an issue from the rule of law, and the minister acted illegally in creating a policy that went contrary to the legislation, and that's what this case is about."
The Department of Citizenship and Immigration must formally invite Ishaq to attend a ceremony. Several are scheduled in Ontario between now and the Oct. 19 election.
...............................................
The laws of Canada allow religious freedom and its insane to appeal this matter to the supreme court, using taxpayer's money.
The Conservative government might loose a lot of votes with this issue, in the upcoming election.
