|
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Im sure TK knows who 'comrade' Freddie was talking bout when he mentioned 'Mr Wild Man'?
TK YOU CARE TO COMMENT ON THIS:
A senior police officer on Thursday said that key officers of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Eve Leary, have all denied giving permission to attorney-at-law Nigel Hughes for the removal of the surveillance tape from the Hamilton Esso station on the morning when its co-owner, Brian Hamilton was shot.
There has been some public concern over the tape being removed by Hughes from the crime scene and being kept for more than two days.
Hughes, who is also the president of the Guyana Bar Association, in response to a letter in this newspaper had stated that when he arrived at the gas station with the father of the victim the police officers were outside and had informed the father that they had completed examination of the area where Hamilton was shot.
"A senior police officer in charge of the party of policemen informed Mr Hamilton that he was waiting upon his arrival to get the tape which was in the recording unit of the surveillance camera. A request was made for the tape to be viewed and copied and returned to the police. Permission was granted by the senior officer for this to be done and I personally undertook to return the tape.
"During the course of the afternoon I spoke with a senior police officer from the Criminal Investigation Units at Eve Leary as well as the senior officer to whom I had previously undertaken to return the tape and confirmed with them both that the tape would be delivered personally by me to Eve Leary. This was agreed by the officer to whom I spoke."
However, Stabroek News contacted a senior police officer on Thursday who requested anonymity and he said all the officers at Eve Leary have denied granting Hughes permission. The senior policeman said that no one apart from the police is authorised to remove anything from the scene of a crime.
According to the officer, the police are continuing investigations into the murder, in addition to the issue of how the tape was removed from the scene.
It was pointed out to the officer that Hughes has admitted publicly that the tape was removed by him and that he had returned it to the police two days after. Hughes had however stated that he had received permission to remove the tape.
The officer reiterated that his officers have denied granting any permission, adding that statements would be taken in the matter and the owner of the gas station will be questioned as to who actually removed the tape.
Asked if the owner had a right to remove the tape, the officer replied in the negative.
The officer said that after the investigation is completed the police would be seeking legal advice on the matter.
Contacted on Thursday Hughes told Stabroek News that "The police had already handed over the property to Mr Hamilton. The tape was removed after the police (handed over the scene)."
Hughes said he was not prepared to comment on the appropriateness of him taking the tape. He pointed out that the recording on the tape was not of the actual scene where Hamilton was shot in his office, but it showed the outside of the station.
The tape would have recorded all who had entered and exited the gas station.
Albert,
I want to see you guys do the Inquiry into Buxton. I am not in a position to talk about anyone, except what I read in the media. What I find interesting is how you cowards and scamps rely on Freddi's writings at these moments and demonize him otherwise. He was the only person at the time to risk his life to write it down, yet you asses (Liz in particular) fire him from his job at UG. He was the only Guyanese to write a scholarly analysis in a publication on that issue, yet you and Liz conspired to fire him.
Albert,
I want to see you guys do the Inquiry into Buxton.
Albert are you guys brave enough to accept an Inquiry from 2000 to 2010?
I see:
A private delegation headed by Bill Richardson, a former American governor and diplomat, and which included Eric Schmidt, Google’s chairman, visited North Korea to urge greater openness in internet and wireless communications. The State Department said the trip was “ill-advised”.
Bump
Recycling the same CRAP over and over. Roger Khan committed the Crime and did his time!!!!!!!! Benship was guilty of Treason and did NOT do his time!!!
hey hey hey...dem PNc bais like dem scare foh put rajah Khan pon de trial. Aluh gat de other ads dem rojah put in de newspapers? Hey hey hey.
Slow day in slopcan land.
Nehru posted:Recycling the same CRAP over and over. Roger Khan committed the Crime and did his time!!!!!!!! Benship was guilty of Treason and did NOT do his time!!!
Benship and his people gots connections.
Billy Ram Balgobin posted:Originally Posted by TK:Dude please post the other ad where he said he was working for the PPP government.
Dr. Khemraj,
Your job as an activist of the AFC should not be one of defending the PNC. This is not change for the better. This is taking us backward.
Is he still defending the PNC?
Former Member posted:Originally Posted by Prashad:It seems by reading here that most likely there were several phantom squads operating independently and in ignorance of each other in Guyana during the crime spree.
No sir.......De President and De Home Affairs Minister was dealing with one man.....Roger Khan.
Then how would you explain the killing of the black muslims by the Police.
Access to this requires a premium membership.