Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Rohee predicts ‘Tsunami’ victory for PPP/C at the next polls … accuses opposition of ‘political posturing’

 

By Gary Eleazar

April 14, 2012 | By | Filed Under News 

Source - Kaieteur News

 

Home Affairs Minister, Clement Rohee

 

Home Affairs Minister Clement Rohee, yesterday sought to debunk the Combined Opposition presentations thus far in the House as ‘lies and political posturing.’


Rohee, in the 2012 Budget debate, said that the opposition political posturing is replicated even where the opposition speakers have honed in on specific perceived instances of controversy and a lack of transparency and accountability.


Rohee said that the opposition criticisms of the Amaila Falls Hydro Electric Project, the CJIA Expansion and the proposed Georgetown Marriott all lack substance and fall in the realm of political posturing.

 

The Home Affairs Minister stated that such is the rhetoric of the political opposition that should there be General or Local Government Elections then the ruling People’s Progressive Party Civic (PPP/C) would have a Tsunami-like victory at the polls.


In speaking to the much talked about new dispensation of Parliament, Rohee said, “The fact is 166,127 persons have kept us in the government and we have no doubt that come next election or the Local Government elections there will be a resurgence like a tsunami.”


“Nothing that APNU says about the economy is true,” said Rohee as he reminded that the government for its part has over the years consistently set out its developmental agendas.


In dismissing the budget debates as a routine replete with rhetoric and lies, Rohee said that it all boils down to two extreme positions.


He explained that on one hand there is the argument that prior to 1992 nothing has happened in terms of development for the country while there are those that argue that post 1992 is the period where there has been no progress in terms of development.


Rohee said that in the end what it comes down to is a contest of credibility.
The Home Affairs Minister reminded, also, of President Donald Ramotar’s words when he reached out to the opposition at the opening of the 10th Parliament but warned that the government will not be held to ransom.


The Minister said that throughout the process, the Opposition has been throwing dust in eyes of people to make them believe that PPP/Cs programmes and policies are not in their interest.


The opposition arguments lacked substance when the members talked about projects such as the proposed Marriott, he said.


“It’s all about political posturing; nothing of substance in opposition.”


“Nothing that APNU says about economy is true…it’s all about political posturing,” and accused the actions of the opposition as being “tantamount to executing national scam.”


Rohee said that the opposition is doing what it is expected to do, which is to oppose but he warned that it is his belief that given the new political dispensation in the House “they are likely to go further.”


He drew reference to the debate on Financial Papers seven and eight which were recently debated in the House and for which the opposition voted down several provisions.


The Minister said that it was his hope that with the convening of the 10th Parliament  and the installation of A Partnership for National Unity, “we would have witnessed a much more constructive approach to this matter of national importance…The fact of the matter is, the more things change, the more they remain the same.”


He said that the opposition has been delivering the same, “puerile, meaningless, hollow political arguments, placing us in this humdrum of a Parliamentary debate.”


On the issue of transparency and accountability, Rohee told the House that he has heard the constant carping and asked if the opposition parties were its custodians and drew reference to the fact that during the time of the PNCR the issue of accountability and transparency was topical.


“Are we to understand that Transparency and Accountability can only be achieved when the opposition is involved and that it does not lie in the realm of the Government?”


The Minister begged the question, “What about the talk of us working together?” He also questioned what benchmarks will be used for such an engagement.


The Minister cautioned of what awaits. It is hoped that the opposition has not already made up its mind and that “this is their moment of glory.”


He said that he hopes that the presentations on the part of the government side would have informed the opposition critics.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Rohee is preparing to make another challenge for PPP leadership and Presidency.  He has got his key guys like Rev Al, the Bossman in Toronto, Albert and others on this board readying the process.  This time he is coming prepared. No goat ain't biting him this time.

Prashad

On what basis will this election tsunami occur? For keeping a police commissioner who “benefitted materially from the drugs trade?” For failing to provide an investigation/closure into who killed Minister Sawh? For failing to produce the forensic lab? For victimizing Mr Ramnarine?  Should the voters turn a blind eye to these things?

FM
Originally Posted by Tar_K:

On what basis will this election tsunami occur? For keeping a police commissioner who “benefitted materially from the drugs trade?” For failing to provide an investigation/closure into who killed Minister Sawh? For failing to produce the forensic lab? For victimizing Mr Ramnarine?  Should the voters turn a blind eye to these things?

For a prof you are sure loose with your accusations. How did you substantiate that Green benefited from the drug trade? Is it the job of the PPP to provide closure for Sat Sawh who played with the devil and got burnt or the police(a supposedly autonomous entity)?  Was Mr Ramnarine really victimized or did he indeed break the law by giving an interview without consulting his superior. Try doing this at your institution as see how quickly you lose your tenure. hahahahh

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:

On what basis will this election tsunami occur? For keeping a police commissioner who “benefitted materially from the drugs trade?” For failing to provide an investigation/closure into who killed Minister Sawh? For failing to produce the forensic lab? For victimizing Mr Ramnarine?  Should the voters turn a blind eye to these things?

For a prof you are sure loose with your accusations. How did you substantiate that Green benefited from the drug trade? Is it the job of the PPP to provide closure for Sat Sawh who played with the devil and got burnt or the police(a supposedly autonomous entity)?  Was Mr Ramnarine really victimized or did he indeed break the law by giving an interview without consulting his superior. Try doing this at your institution as see how quickly you lose your tenure. hahahahh

----------------

The US said Green benefitted from the drugs trade. It is enough to warrant a no confidence vote for him and an investigation. I am glad to read the garbage to write with respect to the late Minister. I hope the guys are keeping notes to remind you fools.

FM

Rohee's petty criticism of the opposition is intended to be a detraction from the lack of confidence the populace have in him handling the matter of Green and Ramnarine.

 

He will never be the leader of the PPP/C. He should tell us the real reason that US took away his visa.

 

The people have spoken by making the PPP/C a minority in the House of Parliament. Ramotar best learn fast on how to reach out to the other side, else it's constipation time.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Tar_K:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:

On what basis will this election tsunami occur? For keeping a police commissioner who “benefitted materially from the drugs trade?” For failing to provide an investigation/closure into who killed Minister Sawh? For failing to produce the forensic lab? For victimizing Mr Ramnarine?  Should the voters turn a blind eye to these things?

For a prof you are sure loose with your accusations. How did you substantiate that Green benefited from the drug trade? Is it the job of the PPP to provide closure for Sat Sawh who played with the devil and got burnt or the police(a supposedly autonomous entity)?  Was Mr Ramnarine really victimized or did he indeed break the law by giving an interview without consulting his superior. Try doing this at your institution as see how quickly you lose your tenure. hahahahh

----------------

The US said Green benefitted from the drugs trade. It is enough to warrant a no confidence vote for him and an investigation. I am glad to read the garbage to write with respect to the late Minister. I hope the guys are keeping notes to remind you fools.

The US also said there was WMD in Iraq, did you believe them then and even now? hahahahahaha

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The US also said there was WMD in Iraq, did you believe them then and even now? hahahahahaha

Hydroman, what does the pronouncement of the US has to do with the assassination of Sawh under the watch of the PPP adminisitration?

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The US also said there was WMD in Iraq, did you believe them then and even now? hahahahahaha

Hydroman, what does the pronouncement of the US has to do with the assassination of Sawh under the watch of the PPP adminisitration?

Because you are a dunce who is close again to being put on ignore for your name calling, I will excuse your ignorance this one time as you don't know how to read. According to TK, the US proclaimed that Green benefited materially from the drug trade. They didn't provide any evidence just as they didn't when they proclaimed that Iraq had WMD. No mention of Sat Sawh with regard to the US is relevant. 

FM
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The US also said there was WMD in Iraq, did you believe them then and even now? hahahahahaha

Hydroman, what does the pronouncement of the US has to do with the assassination of Sawh under the watch of the PPP adminisitration?

Because you are a dunce who is close again to being put on ignore for your name calling, I will excuse your ignorance this one time as you don't know how to read. According to TK, the US proclaimed that Green benefited materially from the drug trade. They didn't provide any evidence just as they didn't when they proclaimed that Iraq had WMD. No mention of Sat Sawh with regard to the US is relevant. 

 You are disgrace to the human race. The hydro can't make up for the lack of oxygen at your birth. I may be a dunce; unlike you I am teachable.

 

What happened to your witchy woman high pitch laugh?

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:
Originally Posted by Tar_K:
Originally Posted by BGurd_See:

The US also said there was WMD in Iraq, did you believe them then and even now? hahahahahaha

Hydroman, what does the pronouncement of the US has to do with the assassination of Sawh under the watch of the PPP adminisitration?

Because you are a dunce who is close again to being put on ignore for your name calling, I will excuse your ignorance this one time as you don't know how to read. According to TK, the US proclaimed that Green benefited materially from the drug trade. They didn't provide any evidence just as they didn't when they proclaimed that Iraq had WMD. No mention of Sat Sawh with regard to the US is relevant. 

 You are disgrace to the human race. The hydro can't make up for the lack of oxygen at your birth. I may be a dunce; unlike you I am teachable.

 

What happened to your witchy woman high pitch laugh?

I warned you, now you are on ignore. 

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

Rohee predicts ‘Tsunami’ victory for PPP/C at the next polls … accuses opposition of ‘political posturing’

 

By Gary Eleazar

April 14, 2012 | By | Filed Under News 

Source - Kaieteur News

 

Home Affairs Minister, Clement Rohee

 

Home Affairs Minister Clement Rohee, yesterday sought to debunk the Combined Opposition presentations thus far in the House as ‘lies and political posturing.’

.

PPP at 38%.  Since when 38% is a Tsunami.

 

Janet got 55% when she ran, that was a Tsunami.

 

Some body teach Rohee lil sense.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×