Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Rohee to Opposition on ‘No Confidence’ motion… ‘Put up’ or ‘shut up

July 1, 2014, By Filed Under News, Source

 

“The Peoples Progressive Party challenges the opposition parties to demonstrate their testicular capacity by giving effect to their stated desire for a no-confidence motion in parliament, failing which they should shut up and forever hold their peace.”

 

General Secretary of the PPP Clement Rohee

General Secretary of the PPP Clement Rohee


This was PPP General Secretary, Clement Rohee, towards the combined political opposition, the Alliance for Change (AFC) and A Partnership for National Unity (APNU).


The AFC had indicated that it would be contemplating bringing a motion of no confidence against the PPP government since all of the changes that it bargained for, the development of the country have not been given an ear by the government.


In addition, there was the Finance Minister “violation of the law” by spending $4.5B of monies not approved by the National Assembly in the 2014 budget.


AFC’s motion would however, have no effect if it didn’t have the support of the main political opposition APNU. APNU has since established that they had to discuss the matter but the end result would be that they might support it.


According to Rohee, the fact is that both the AFC and the APNU are “basking in the glory of their combined Parliamentary one-seat majority which they fully well know would not continue in any future elections.


“The statements by the opposition are therefore nothing but the work of a politically bankrupt opposition intended to make up for their pathetic performance in and out of Parliament rather than out of any clear and well thought out position.”


Elections posturing


If a motion of no confidence is passed on the current government, then a period of six months is given before National Elections are called.


Rohee, who is of the opinion that the opposition would lose its one-seat majority should new elections be held, was asked to justify his statements against the backdrop the statement by former political executive and analyst Ralph Ramkarran, who is contending that the new elections could yield the same results.


He responded that everyone is free to give their prognosis of what they discern or predict based on their analysis that could be the outcome of any future elections.


“What I am saying is on the part of the PPP, we remain eternally optimistic about our possibilities, our prospects at any future elections held in Guyana. This optimism that we have is based on the work that we have been doing on the ground, the feedback that we have been receiving in terms of those areas where we suffered losses because we have been doing a lot of targeting and not scattershot work.


“Our work is more targeted, more concentrated and more results oriented” said Rohee.


The GS added, “The comments that I made about how the party sees the outcome of any future elections with respect to the opposition losing its one-seat majority, that is a great possibility as far as our analysis shows, the fear with respect to the outcome of any future elections returning to be the same, that for us is more imagined than real.”


Rohee was then asked that, if there is passage of the no confidence motion in Parliament by the combined opposition and elections have to be held, does the PPP intend to have Donald Ramotar as the Presidential candidate or is there a possibility that someone else would be used?


To that he responded, “I am not prepared at this point to get in the realm of speculative politics when it comes to housekeeping matters of the PPP, and its future move in respect to such matters. When we come to that bridge we will cross it.”


He was then asked if he would be interested in being the Presidential candidate if a no confidence motion is moved. He said that he would “prefer not to discuss that at this time.”

Replies sorted oldest to newest

PSC cautions against ‘No Confidence Motion’

…says will signal political instability to foreign investors

 

July 1, 2014, By Filed Under News, Source

 

The Private Sector Commission (PSC) of Guyana believes that the holding of snap elections as a result of a ‘No Confidence Motion’ being passed against Government will only seek to destabilize the country.


The PSC by way of a public missive yesterday said, that it had taken note of the recent public statements by the Opposition with regard to passing a motion of no confidence in the Government of Guyana.


“We also take note of the President’s remarks challenging the Opposition to do so if they think that it is necessary.”


According to the PSC, “it will be very unfortunate if such a motion is passed as it would signal political instability to our foreign investors, financiers, customers and suppliers.”


The PSC said that “this will further increase the political risk premium added to the cost of capital when overseas funding is sought by private entities and can negatively impact our economy.”


The PSC said too that it believes that for progress to be made in a dispensation where a minority Government and a Majority Opposition exists, the political culture should consist of dialogue, compromise and patriotism on issues of national interest and development.


“This culture has been very much absent since our last general elections in 2011 as both sides of the House have exposed their limitations in dealing with such a dispensation.”


According to the PSC, the calling for elections prematurely is signaling that only in a “winner takes all” environment can progress be made.


“This does not augur well for a plural society such as Guyana,” according to the PSC.


The PSC said it is not hopeful that general elections will automatically resolve many of the problems facing the country.


It notes however that, if elections are to be called, “we hope that they would be conducted efficiently and effectively…We would also hope that whatever the results, that they would be accepted by all and that the country can move forward so that every member of our population can be guaranteed a better life.”


It was the Alliance For Change (AFC) which first signaled that it was preparing to table a motion of no confidence in Government.


While A Partnership for National Unity (APNU) has not formally taken a decision on the proposed motion, it has signaled a propensity to support such if brought by the AFC.


President Donald Ramotar has since dared the political opposition to table the motion.


Should a motion of no confidence be successfully passed in the National Assembly, the President will have to call general elections within six months.

FM

These ppl are so stupid. In all First World Democracies from time to time there are Minority governments-and they are voted down with no calamity in the future. Only in Guyana, foreign investor would be swayed away. I think the voters in Guyana showed maturity in the way they voted in 2011. Next time, the PPP is out and goor riddance FOREVER.

S
Originally Posted by seignet:

These ppl are so stupid. In all First World Democracies from time to time there are Minority governments-and they are voted down with no calamity in the future. Only in Guyana, foreign investor would be swayed away. I think the voters in Guyana showed maturity in the way they voted in 2011. Next time, the PPP is out and goor riddance FOREVER.

Says Ms Cleo.

Nehru

The opposition is useless in dealing with the PPP which must be held accountable.

 

All that they (opposition) do is talk and talk is cheap.

 

Moses threatened a no confidence motion and is nowhere to be seen. They are making a mockery of themselves. Case in point, instead of taking the spending of funds to the courts, they claim that they will file a complain with the police. They are making a total mockery of themselves.

 

The opposition lacks leadership and direction.

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×