Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Russia ban US from using Space Station over Ukraine sanctions

In retaliation for imposing sanctions, Russia will also bar its rocket engines from launching US military satellites

From left: Steve Swanson from the US and Alexander Skvortsov and Oleg Artemyev from Russia before the launch
From left: Steve Swanson from the US and Alexander Skvortsov and Oleg Artemyev from Russia before the launch Photo: Camera Press/Ria Novosti
 

Russia is to deny the US future use of the International Space Station beyond 2020 and will also bar its rocket engines from launching US military satellites as it hits back at American sanctions imposed over Ukraine crisis.

Russia’s deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin announced a series of punitive measures on Tuesday against the US in response to sanctions imposed after Russia annexed Crimea.

The two countries have long cooperated closely on space exploration despite their clashes in foreign policy.

The Space Station is manned by both American and Russian crew, but the only way to reach it is by using Russia’s Soyuz spacecraft.

The US is keen to keep the $100 billion (£600) ISS flying until at least 2024, four years beyond its original target.

At a time when Moscow is struggling to reform its accident-plagued space programme, Mr Rogozin said US plans to deny export licences for some high-technology items were a blow to Russian industry. “These sanctions are out of place and inappropriate,” Mr Rogozin said. “We have enough of our own problems.”

Moscow’s response would affect NK-33 and RD-180 engines which Russia supplies to the US, Mr Rogozin said. “We are ready to deliver these engines but on one condition that they will not be used to launch military satellites,” he said.

RD-180 engines are used to boost Atlas 5 rockets manufactured by United Launch Alliance, a partnership of Lockheed Martin and Boeing that holds a virtual monopoly on launching U.S. military satellites.

 

 

Mr Rogozin said Moscow was planning "strategic changes" in its space industry after 2020 and aims to use money and "intellectual resources" that now go to the space station for a "a project with more prospects".

He suggested Russia could use the station without the United States, saying: "The Russian segment can exist independently from the American one. The U.S. one cannot."

The US space agency NASA is working with companies to develop space taxis with the goal of restoring US transport to the station by 2017, but the United States currently pays Russia more than $60 million per person to fly its astronauts up.

Mr Rogozin said Russia will suspend the operation of 11 GPS sites on its territory from June and seek talks with Washington on opening similar sites in the United States for Russia's own satellite navigation system, Glonass.

He threatened the permanent closure of the GPS sites in Russia if that is not agreed by September.

He said the suspension of the sites would not affect everyday operations of the GPS system in Russia, where it is used by millions of Russians for navigation on their smartphones and in their cars.

The upheaval in Ukraine - where the United States says Russia is backing separatists and the Kremlin accuses Washington of helping protesters to topple a Moscow-friendly president in February, has led to the worst East-West crisis since the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union.

In addition to the hi-tech sector sanctions, the US has imposed visa bans and assets freezes on officials and lawmakers and targeted companies with links to President Vladimir Putin. The European Union has also imposed sanctions.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said earlier on Tuesday that the latest EU measures were an "exhausted, trite approach" that would only deepen discord and hamper efforts to defuse the crisis in Ukraine.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

 

The US is by its technological might a super power. No other nation is remotely at its level. It also has perfectly functional shuttles in storage should the necessity to demonstrate it can keep the station suppliedrise. That is not necessary since there are alternatives ready to come on line. While the Russian section of the Sppace station, per agreement, was a control segment, that alone does not mean the Russians own the station. Their contribution to its construction is miniscule compared to other partners. Further, they were contracted to ferry resupply cargo because they could not do it for free as others did since they were broke.

 

This simply spurs NASS to complete its timeline for supply vehicles quicker. Independent agencies are already doing the resupply, The crafts simply has to be redesigned to be more robust and with necessary life support to replace the Soviet vehicles. That is only a matter of ramping up what is already in the pipeline. I am glad NASA has cut all ties with the Russians. Hopefully they will also begin to implement proprietary GPS codes in the future to be licensed by receiving device so the Russians can be screwed royalty if this is the fight they want. It is pure charity of the US that the signals can be received by anyone at present.

FM
Last edited by Former Member

It is crazy to back Russia.  We should not take sides.  Look at how many East Indian students lost their lives on Russian streets to Russian Neo Nazis while Putin turned a blind eye.  Let them swelter in their own pit.

FM

I agree.. the Russians were responsible for the slavery of Africans and the servitude of Indians...

We should always support our anglo master..

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Lucas:

stormedborn,

are you Wet dreaming?

Not me, you are. Space X Dragon just dropped off a couple of tons of supplies at a ten percent  the cost of a Russians supply. They can reclad that and retrofit it for  humans in short order. The specs for a control module for the Space station is not a formidable project. Get it into your noggins; Russian and China do not yet have the technological skills ( computing or otherwise) to do any of that on their own.China never innovate. They steal. Russia has the not invested in its high tech industry.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×