Having looked at CBS's 60 Minutes report on the 9/11 Commission with clear implications of the Saudis (government and private citizens and organizations) you have to ask what is the motive, if the Saudis have hijacked Islam for its own purposes, of what the world has witnessed in the past 2 decades.
We have to remember that on November 20, 1979, with the Iranian hostage crisis in its third week, gunmen stunned the world by seizing the Grand Mosque in Mecca. They held 100,000 people hostage and it lasted two weeks. There were hundreds of deaths and a lot of rage against the United States. These dudes wanted revenge and to get back to a way of Islam that was frankly barbarous. The Saudi royal family madea deal with the insurgents, thus beginning the export of wahabbism and the madrassas around the world.
Remember also when the first Bush took action to drive Saddam out of Kuwait, the Saudi King spurned Osama bin Laden's offer to get the Baathist army out of Kuwait and he was seething when he saw US Army boots on the holy land of Mecca. Al Qaeda was born.
On this forum the popular sentiment is that Islam is either an evil religion, or all religion is evil or ordinary Muslims delight in the atrocities committed in the name of Islam. No one is going to eradicate from the minds of those who see Islam as evil that the Quran encourages this medieval behavior. I've tried to advance the notion that Islam is misused by those who are un-Islamic and therefore the atrocities are not due to Islam and that we all are responsible for reacting to this and not just leave it up to ordinary Muslims.
The key is to understand the difference between ideology and religion. What happened in the past week in Turkey, Bangladesh and Iraq is the work of an ideology in the Muslim holy month of Ramadan in which the majority of the casualty are Muslim people.
The question then is why did the US government shield the Saudis on 9/11? Their's was the only plane to fly that day out of the US from Houston I believe. Why did the first Bush not intervene before Saddam walked into Iraq, after Saddam's Baathist army took on the Iranian Shiites in a proxy was in the US interest? This intervention is something the US was asked (as a n observer at the Gulf Cooperation Council when Saddam complained about Kuwait slant drilling and the loss of billions of dollars due to keeping the oil price artificially low, which helped us American consumer and industry). Also we have to ask why did ther 2nd Bush attack Iraq when it had nothing to do with 9/11 and had no WMD, thuis creating the Baathist-dominated ISIS?
I'm sure you all have things to weigh in on. I don't mind if the conversation is opened up about Islam in the 21st century. Ads a Muslim I think there needs to be a reformation-like process to get some authoritative direction on Islam. The Saudis have taken over a religion of which they are about 1%. Maybe it's time to make Mecca and the Kaaba an international place not owned by anybody.