Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Washington (CNN) In a rebuke to the White House, the Senate approved a bill Tuesday to allow victims and families of the 9/11 attacks to sue Saudi Arabia for its alleged involvement in the terrorist strikes.

The bill, which the White House opposes, House Speaker Paul Ryan expressed concerns about, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was slow to embrace, had stalled for months. It now heads to the House.
But in the end, the bill's authors -- John Cornyn of Texas, the second ranking Senate Republican, and Chuck Schumer of New York, the third-ranking Senate Democrat -- were able to pass the bill on a voice vote, a rare feat in the divided chamber, especially for a controversial issue.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest renewed the threat that President Barack Obama will veto the bill.
"Yes, as I think I've mentioned before it's given the concerns we've expressed it's difficult to imagine the President signing this legislation and that continues to be true," Earnest told reporters.
The White House and State Department say the bill could have dramatic ramifications for the United States and citizens living abroad to retaliatory lawsuits.
"This legislation would change long standing international law regarding sovereign immunity and the President of the United States and continues to harbor serious concerns that this legislation would make the United States vulnerable in other court systems around the world," Earnest said.
Formally known as the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, the bill would prevent Saudi Arabia and other countries alleged to have terrorist ties from invoking their sovereign immunity in federal court.
Saudi Arabia has long denied any role in the 9/11 attacks, but victims' families have repeatedly sought to bring the matter to court, only to be rebuffed after the country has invoked legal immunity allowed under current law. In March, Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir warned lawmakers that it would sell $750 billion in U.S. assets, including treasury securities, should the bill become law.
 

 

 

 

Replies sorted oldest to newest

ksazma posted:

This could really expose President Bush because the argument being made is that while all aviation activities were suspended, Saudi nationals were allowed to fly out by Bush's permission. Does that make him culpable in aiding and abetting?

Nah, the good man he is, he did not want to see harm to anyone given the fact that most of the hijackers were Saudis!

FM

Can Iraq sue us for the invasion in 2013 given that our 'justification' for the invasion was false making it criminal or the lessor charge of culpability for being negligent. The US is a country of laws that are above anyone.

The president isn't going to let these crazy Republicans get away with their shortsightedness.

FM
ba$eman posted:
ksazma posted:

This could really expose President Bush because the argument being made is that while all aviation activities were suspended, Saudi nationals were allowed to fly out by Bush's permission. Does that make him culpable in aiding and abetting?

Nah, the good man he is, he did not want to see harm to anyone given the fact that most of the hijackers were Saudis!

Good is a matter of opinion. To many he is reckless. He tried to give away 25m to anyone who will tell him where OBL was and Obama found him and still get to keep the 25m.

FM
ksazma posted:

Can Iraq sue us for the invasion in 2013 given that our 'justification' for the invasion was false making it criminal or the lessor charge of culpability for being negligent. The US is a country of laws that are above anyone.

The president isn't going to let these crazy Republicans get away with their shortsightedness.

I'm sure there is a case for reparation.  I say, go ahead!!  

FM
ksazma posted:

Can Iraq sue us for the invasion in 2013 given that our 'justification' for the invasion was false making it criminal or the lessor charge of culpability for being negligent. The US is a country of laws that are above anyone.

The president isn't going to let these crazy Republicans get away with their shortsightedness.

I'm sure there is a case for reparation.  I say, go ahead!!  

FM
yuji22 posted:
ba$eman posted:

These Wahabs must start paying for their evil deeds!!

About time. The families of victims of the 911 evil deed by Islamist Terrorists deserve financial compensation.

Trump will go after the evil Saudi Royal Family Empire.

This is the Trump effect playing out here. The declassified pages of 9/11 report would never came to light if Trump didn't call for total ban on Muslims to enter the United States. Obama is covering for Hillary. Ask Baseman to elaborate on this trick to cover for Hillary white house bid.

FM
Cobra posted:
yuji22 posted:
ba$eman posted:

These Wahabs must start paying for their evil deeds!!

About time. The families of victims of the 911 evil deed by Islamist Terrorists deserve financial compensation.

Trump will go after the evil Saudi Royal Family Empire.

This is the Trump effect playing out here. The declassified pages of 9/11 report would never came to light if Trump didn't call for total ban on Muslims to enter the United States. Obama is covering for Hillary. Ask Baseman to elaborate on this trick to cover for Hillary white house bid.

Bai, everyone knows, them trying to playing hanky-panky, he gon tek the debits and she the credits, but like Kszama, baseman dozz mek sure everything get reconciled to the right account.  No "slush fund" gimmicky, so the true piper must be paid!!  [Sly fox] Obama cannot cover for [crooked] Hillary!!

Dem think because we all come from Guyana, we all stupid like Chief!!

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×