Either he or Jonas would have been a good choice.

I wonder if Lowenfield will again go rogue and seat 33 APNU+AFC members, 31 PPP/C ones and 1 from the joiner. I wouldn't put it past him to do that.

@Former Member posted:

Either he or Jonas would have been a good choice.

I think this is a rotating seat for the joinder parties.

Chairman of GECOM has made her approved statement to the respective sections of the judiciary and other parts on the election results.

33 seats -- PPP/C

31 seats -- PNCR/APNU/AFC

01 seat --- Joinder Group

Lowenfield has no role nor influence as the matter proceeded with the new government.

There is a legal process under the constitution and related laws that after the results are officially announced, the opposition group(s) can pursue a legal challenge to the results through the respective court levels.

PNCR/APNU/AFC will have to decide whether to challenge the results.

Only trouble is that Lowenfield is a special case.

The joinder parties should rotate the seat every fortnight because in the current arrangement the first in line is unlikely to occupy the seat and the second inline is highly unlikely to occupy the seat.