I've been saying some of the things Avinash mentioned. For one, we have to look at the components of GDP, and Aviansh outlined them. How much of it is from sustainable development efforts as opposed to hand-outs (repatriation, illicit laundered money, bad loans, etc.). Next, how much of it is from price increases of expors that are cyclical in nature? Then you have to look at how the consumption component of GDP is distributed. If you have 5% of families spending on multi-storey dwelling, etc. and the rest living on subsistence consumption then what good is that?
The point is there is GDP growth and then there is GDP growth. This concept not so much escapes the understanding of some as it is ignored for propaganda reasons.