I noticed last week that after publishing details of corrupt practises by former PNC collaborators in Linden, and also highlighted that the Constitution is not open to interpretation, I got locked out. Before I get down to answer the denials of DG on complacency and collaboration with the crimes committed in Wismar in 1963, I would like to know why the PPP is running scared of my disclosures just before an election.
By the way, anybody heard about those fake ballot papers printed by the same paper who have been printing illegal copies of school books etc.? I wonder how the swap over is going to happen between the genuine ballot boxes and the compromised ones.
- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Former Member
Looks like you were put in the doghouse for breaking forum rules.
I was asked to respond to the denials from our inhouse collaborator. But a lot of people within the PPP don't want their two timing reputation to come to light. I know that a few well connected Indos in MacKenzie were opportunists who gained from the deaths of Indos in Wismar during the troubles in 1963. They crying crocodile tears whilst feasting on the spoils of the 1963 riots.
But there is more to this saga. Much more. My constant disclosures about some of the stuff in the Constitution is making a few people restless. Dem friends calling them to try to kill those stories and push them out of view. I got the emails from people in charge of the GNI access keys asking me not to jeopardise the PPP aims to rig public opinion on GNI.
He was being used as a Lab Rat but the British Lab released him after tests shows he is useless.
Add Reply
Sign In To Reply
1,563 online (1 member
/
1,562 guests)