This is just your view of the world and to say it is the saving grace for it is a load of bunk. In ancient times, barbarians raped and pillaged from one end of the planet to another each subscribing to its own sense of divine inspiration and often killed on that account.

Hinduism on its own developed a multitude of schools each with its own merit and many with the grotesque sin of varna. It still strangles india today making outcasts of some 300 million people.

I cannot say much for the other religions either since each on its own has heaped upon the world uncountable instances of hideous brutality. If religion does anything good it is to create in groups and out groups and the out groups are always the "bad" ones.

The greatest thing that has happened to the planet is the realization that morality does not need god and one can on their own come to conclusions as the the nature and necessity for goodness since it is inevitably the efficient cause. And here goodness does not need a god principle. It  can amazingly come from something as surprisingly as a selfish gene ( in the sense of Dawkins).

As for your indifference to science, that is inane. If there is a god then he she it  made our minds and our minds are windows to the universe. We are therefore the universe apprehending itself. Science is by extension that means to end schema which we know ourselves. While you pretend you can achieve knowledge by introspection you in the process fabricate layered schemes of assumptions.

Sitting on our asses and chanting the lotus sutra or reciting the lords prayer or the shahaadah or any of a multitude of sacred whisperings would not create this medium we use to communicate. It would not give us better crops, quicker transportation better medicine or methodology for sustaining our burgeoning populations. Science will. 3

If we destroy ourselves it is not on account of our lack of god. It will be because that is what must be. All things come into being and pass into nothingness, we likewise maybe. It is pure arrogance to say we can be otherwise than what is the background cadence of the universe, entropic decay.

See, Morality without the concept of God will not last long. 

It is true that a few people exploited the concept of God for personal benefits. But, based on the few exceptions, you should not remove the basic system itself. A few railway accidents happen and due to such accidents, you should not cancel all the trains. You should concentrate to avoid the accidents. Similarly, some students might have copied in the examinations. Try to catch, such students. But, do not remove the system of examination itself. The system serves majority, doing lot of good. You forget the vast positive side of the system based on the minor negative side. The concept of God controls the sin in the society. If the concept of God is removed, lot of people will do lot of sins since already the ways to escape the punishment in courts are already available. The society will be crushed into pieces in the absence of the fear for sin. If God disappears, the hell disappears subsequently.

The concept of sin will drown and destroy the society like a Tsunami. However, this does not mean that the concept of God is again a created view only to save the society. Such conclusions are not correct. The concept of God is basically true and we have explained the positive side of such concept. It is a real concept and hence, the positive side is also real. Of course, the minor negative side is also real and control should be implemented to check-up such negative exploitations. 

Social justice cannot be maintained if the existence of God is not accepted. If God does not exist, what is the use of reducing the over attachment to this world? If you say that the over attachment to worldly bonds leads to sin and injustice, which in turn disturb the balance of society, nobody understands the overall effect of it. In such case, everybody wants that all other human beings should follow pravrutti to maintain the balance of the society and individually commits sins. This becomes the famous story that everybody should pour a cup of milk in the empty tank kept by the king so that everybody can pour a cup of water, which cannot be detected.

Everybody wants the social justice and balance of society, but at the same time wants his or her over attachment result in the sin, to proceed in undetectable way. You cannot control every human being through the law of court and the police department. The reason is that every individual working in any department is with the same psychology. Today, you are hearing the news that an honorable judge of the honorable court has taken huge bribe to protect the injustice! Every employee in every department is influenced by the corruption. The employee may belong to government or administration or parliament or assembly or even judiciary system. Very few only exist, who follow justice due to fear of God.

Society is not balanced by god. It is balanced by prohibitions and sanctions. If you steal you are punished. If you do not participate you are expelled or suffer from want.

=========

If that is case, then why there are so many cases in which criminal escape punishment through use of expert advocates in the court?

The kingdom or government of atheists, which does not recognize God, finally ends in injustice. The atheist will not recognize the underlying divine government. He only accepts the visible human government that has established courts of law and the police department as executive system for implementing the punishments given by the court.

Now the atheist will think that if he can mislead the court by false witnesses and intellectual advocates, he need not fear committing injustice, which gives more enjoyment by the accumulation of wealth. He does not fear God or hell. He only fears the courts and police and knows how to escape them.

At present the pseudo-secularism is almost like atheism. In atheism, you deny God and in pseudo-secularism, you forget God. Both are one and the same as far as the final effect is concerned. The atheist often argues demanding that theists show him the evidence for the existence of hell and heaven. I ask him one question, “Have you shown Me the entire space of this cosmos and it’s boundaries to prove the absence of hell and heaven?” Ofcourse My question also ends with 50% probability for both existence and non-existence of hell.

But, if you practice the path of justice, there is no harm to you even if hell is absent. But if there is a hell and if you do not follow the path of justice, you are harmed severely (Nanyadasteeti—Gita). Thus, the present system of pseudo-secularism or atheism is a total failure because the divine government is not recognised properly.

End to corruption, apply the Chinese model, one bullet in the head.

Such measures are not permanent. Permanent measure will be to make the people understand the existence of God and Hell. Such fear will definitely enter the inner consciousness and will result in discipline since there is some reason one has to not to do sin. But an atheist he may resists for some time doing sins, but ultimately he will think that there is not God, Hell etc and what is the use of me to control my self and do not do corruption. This will result into atheist committing corruption and crime since no body is there to punish him or reward him. Therefore the essential is to propagate the divine knowledge about the existence of GOd deeply to poeple giving strong thrust on spiritual knowledge through education itself.

i say hang them high

after reading all the excuse why people thief, i will simply say a thief is a thief is a thief,people thief for different reasons,so in that sence i think you should judge them by they needs.

God doesn’t mind even atheism provided the justice is maintained in the society

     Miracles only prove the existence of unimaginable God.  Anybody including the demon demonstrating the miracles is in the service of God to establish the existence of God to an atheist. Miracles exist widely with God in human form, devotees and even evil demons.  Establishment of existence of original unimaginable God is the fundamental subject that needs wide publicity and hence God has spread miracles in wide range.  Once the existence of God is accepted, the atheist becomes theist.  This is the foundation step.

 Even Shankara spent all His life in the first step only to convert atheistic Purvamimamsakas and Buddhists.   Existence of God is needed even to establish Pravrutti through creating fear for hell.  If God and hell are not accepted, the sin will grow to climax in a slow and steady way.  Atheists promise to follow justice even without faith in God, but such promise is not having strong basis and it can be violated at any time.  God doesn’t mind even atheism provided the justice is maintained in the society.  But there is always a possibility of violation of justice if the hell disappears from the mind.  When you are provoked to do injustice, at least the concept of hell and God will control you to certain extent.  At least the percentage of people committing sins will be reduced.  Of course, the concept of God and hell is not bringing the percentage to Zero, but if that concept is totally absent, by one day or other the percentage will be hundred.

For this point only, God comes down to establish His existence and there by create the fear for hell so that at least the percentage of sin and injustice comes to a minimum level, though complete eradication is impossible.  God is not at all  bothered to establish Himself for the sake of Nivrutti.  If the society runs completely on justice, He will not mind even if all the human beings are atheists.

You post your thoughts and ideas.  Illustrate, by example, a successful model where it has worked.