Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

President Barack Obama announces executive actions on U.S. immigration policy during a nationally televised address from the White House on November 20, 2014 in Washington, DC.

Supreme Court rejects Obama administration request on immigration orders.

(CNN) The Supreme Court rejected Monday a request from the Obama administration to rehear a case concerning its executive actions on immigration, dealing another blow to the President's attempt to put in place programs aimed at helping more than 4 million undocumented immigrants.

The programs sought to aid those undocumented immigrants to be able to come out of the shadows and apply for programs that could qualify them for work authorization and associated benefits.
10 things you didn't know about the 'Notorious RBG'
 
Last June, the eight-member court announced it was evenly divided in the case and issued a one-sentence ruling, without comment or dissent, upholding a lower court opinion that blocked the programs from going forward.
The Obama administration asked the court this summer to rehear the case once it had nine members again, although it is unclear when that will be.
Acting Solicitor General Ian Gershengorn argued in briefs that the court "should grant rehearing to provide for a decision by the court when it has a full complement of members, rather than allow a nonprecedential affirmance by an equally divided court to leave in place a nationwide injunction of such significance."
Without comment, the court denied the request, handing a victory to Texas and 25 other states who challenged the programs arguing they represented an unauthorized abuse of presidential power.
Although the Supreme Court will not take up the case again for now, it has been returned to the District Court Judge in Texas.
 
After the Supreme Court's ruling in June, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump tweeted that the court has "kept us safe from exec amnesty -- for now," while Hillary Clinton said it was "heartbreaking" and could "tear apart families."
 

Replies sorted oldest to newest

seignet posted:

That is what good accountants suppose to do, avoid their clients paying taxes. The man is a businessman and he used the loop holes wisely. All his bankruptcies were really a way of write off and not because of poor management. 

It's all shyte.  If you incur loss with value-at risk investments, then you can carry back/forward and offset against future income until used up as long as it's not from a "C" Corp entity.  Trump has done nothing wrong.

How many average people, including Guyanese, who write off rental losses against personal income from multi-fam homes where they also live.  After subtracting interest, taxes and operating losses, many end up with -0- taxable income after exemptions!

People talk sheer shyte.

FM
Chief posted:

The question now, will these 4 million illegals be deported?

A lot of families will be destroyed.

If only those who committed crimes will be deported, will those people who committed identity theft be deported? If that's the case, most of them will be deported.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
seignet posted:

That is what good accountants suppose to do, avoid their clients paying taxes. The man is a businessman and he used the loop holes wisely. All his bankruptcies were really a way of write off and not because of poor management. 

Here's what you need to consider. 

  • Trump invested like a drunken sailor in the 90s on a yacht, the bankrupt Eastern Airlines, and built several casinos at a time just following the economic downturn of the S & L crisis and before the Clinton boom years took off. He couldn't pay off creditors' interest, let alone Principal due.
  • When he declared bankruptcies, there were investors who bought Trump shares (after he was forced by his creditor banks to raise capital this way) who lost their money. This included pension funds and municipal authorities (read OLD PEOPLE and LOCAL GOVERNMENTS for services to the public).
  • Trump's retort when these are pointed out to him is that he's looking out for himself and he's smart and those who lost did not look out for themselves.
Kari

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×