Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Speaker optimistic about resumption of tripartite talks


Written by Adele Rampersaud

Sunday, 24 June 2012 20:55

Source - Guyana Chronicle


SPEAKER of the National Assembly, Raphael Trotman, has expressed optimism that tripartite talks which are set to resume on Tuesday between the government, A Partnership For National Unity (APNU) and Alliance For Change (AFC) would bear some fruit. During a media conference at the Regency Suites on Friday last, Trotman said he was hopeful that the issue of the President’s refusal to sign opposition bills would be discussed.


He deemed President Donald Ramotar’s recent comment -- refusal to sign opposition bills into law if government does not have a say in crafting them -- as a sign of “frustration” with the slim, one-seat, opposition-controlled, 65-seat National Assembly

.
“I think it’s a statement perhaps borne out of frustration that he feels that government is being pressed to the wall, and I would say perhaps bad advice, a combination of the two,” Trotman told the media.


The Speaker argued that the Assembly is empowered to pass laws for the President to assent, unless there is good reason not to do so.


“If you are to understand the concept of the separation of powers -- the legislature has the right to pass laws; and as President, unless he can show very good and exceptional reasons why he shouldn’t assent to them, he ought to,” Trotman explained.


President Ramotar has also cited the separation of powers, but from the perspective that the opposition does not have a right to pass laws without the input of the executive.


Trotman believes that despite statements like Ramotar’s, the National Assembly would be allowed to fulfil its mandate, because government has demonstrated a willingness to be engaged across party lines.


“Despite the rhetoric and what is in the public domain, there are good thoughts and views being expressed,” he said.


Trotman noted that government parliamentarians had participated in Friday’s workshop on working with parliamentary oversight committees like the Public Accounts Committee.


Presidential Advisor on Governance, Ms Gail Teixeira, and Minister within the Ministry of Finance, Juan Edghill, participated on Thursday in a parliamentary meeting with members of the donor community.


“Despite the rhetoric and what’s happening in the public domain, there are good thoughts and views being expressed… We are not getting a sense that government is withdrawing necessarily,” he said.


“I think there is the public posture and then there is the private posture… The two are not necessarily the same, and I would like to say that there are encouraging signs that we are making progress,” Trotman added.


He disclosed that government parliamentarians were attending meetings of various committees, although a High Court ruling in favour of the opposition is now before the Court of Appeal. He promised to remain engaged with the President.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

“If you are to understand the concept of the separation of powers -- the legislature has the right to pass laws; and as President, unless he can show very good and exceptional reasons why he shouldn’t assent to them, he ought to,” Trotman explained.

The President has the powers to not approve a bill. =Period=

FM

The parliamentary opposition can also issue a threat  that it will not support any government-sponsored bill brought to Parliament unless the parliamentary opposition has an input.

 

Ramotar's threat is clearly ill-conceived and ill-advised.

Mitwah

Ramotar wants to get thinngs done but he is dealing with two oppositions, the parliamentary opposition and the PPP "clan of crooks" opposition.  I hope the Ramotar clan prevails in the PPP.

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

President Donald Ramotar and the PPP/C will prevail to again win a majority in the next election.

 

Correct.

He needs to prevail over the Jagdeo clan first.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

“If you are to understand the concept of the separation of powers -- the legislature has the right to pass laws; and as President, unless he can show very good and exceptional reasons why he shouldn’t assent to them, he ought to,” Trotman explained.

The President has the powers to not approve a bill. =Period=

It is not a matter of power you senile twit. It is a matter of his justification for not assenting to the authority of the  only body in the nation whose purview is to pass laws.  If he simply refuse to sign bills as a means of expressing his power then he is unfit for office. Not that I think he was ever fit  for the task.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

President Donald Ramotar and the PPP/C will prevail to again win a majority in the next election.

Weren't you saying that for a year before last November, Ms. Cleo?

 

Does 55% ring any bells? 

Mars
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

“If you are to understand the concept of the separation of powers -- the legislature has the right to pass laws; and as President, unless he can show very good and exceptional reasons why he shouldn’t assent to them, he ought to,” Trotman explained.

The President has the powers to not approve a bill. =Period=

It is not a matter of power you senile twit. It is a matter of his justification for not assenting to the authority of the  only body in the nation whose purview is to pass laws.  If he simply refuse to sign bills as a means of expressing his power then he is unfit for office. Not that I think he was ever fit  for the task.

YOur opinion means as much as Tanto's or the three Stooges.

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

“If you are to understand the concept of the separation of powers -- the legislature has the right to pass laws; and as President, unless he can show very good and exceptional reasons why he shouldn’t assent to them, he ought to,” Trotman explained.

The President has the powers to not approve a bill. =Period=

It is not a matter of power you senile twit. It is a matter of his justification for not assenting to the authority of the  only body in the nation whose purview is to pass laws.  If he simply refuse to sign bills as a means of expressing his power then he is unfit for office. Not that I think he was ever fit  for the task.

YOur opinion means as much as Tanto's or the three Stooges.

 My opinion is inconsequential indeed. However, the truth of a statement with respect to a constitutional construct as  the function of the national assembly is a different matter. Maybe that dull and depressingly ignorant mind of yours cannot fathom the difference but it exists as stated.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

“If you are to understand the concept of the separation of powers -- the legislature has the right to pass laws; and as President, unless he can show very good and exceptional reasons why he shouldn’t assent to them, he ought to,” Trotman explained.

The President has the powers to not approve a bill. =Period=

It is not a matter of power you senile twit. It is a matter of his justification for not assenting to the authority of the  only body in the nation whose purview is to pass laws.  If he simply refuse to sign bills as a means of expressing his power then he is unfit for office. Not that I think he was ever fit  for the task.

Read and understand ..

 

The President has the powers to not approve a bill. =Period=

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

“If you are to understand the concept of the separation of powers -- the legislature has the right to pass laws; and as President, unless he can show very good and exceptional reasons why he shouldn’t assent to them, he ought to,” Trotman explained.

The President has the powers to not approve a bill. =Period=

It is not a matter of power you senile twit. It is a matter of his justification for not assenting to the authority of the  only body in the nation whose purview is to pass laws.  If he simply refuse to sign bills as a means of expressing his power then he is unfit for office. Not that I think he was ever fit  for the task.

Read and understand ..

 

The President has the powers to not approve a bill. =Period=

I could easily retort "parliament has the authority to forge laws". However  there is no increment to understanding in redundancy.  You are habitually redundant. But being non informational is your forte.

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
You are habitually redundant.

 

But being non informational is your forte.

As he babbles about himself infront of the mirror.

It is clear you are to senile to know you make an as of  yourself. If you do know it would be helpful in your buffoonery comes with some creativity. Recycling the same insipid phrases is oppressively boring.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
You are habitually redundant.

 

But being non informational is your forte.

As he babbles about himself infront of the mirror.

It is clear you are to senile to know you make an as of  yourself.

 

If you do know it would be helpful in your buffoonery comes with some creativity.

 

Recycling the same insipid phrases is oppressively boring.

As the tunkalunks bellows to himself.

FM
Originally Posted by cain:

Stormsta, I heard someone say dat you're a "tunkalunk" 

I do not worry about words not in the English language or simply invented with no context. Actually, the man exists without context or rather he is his text, context and subtext so not of our world. 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×