Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Cobra:

It seems most of you endorse interracial marriages and screwing. Therefore,  I am convinced that all of you have a Black man in your family. Now it's time to face the hard question: If you so believe in interracial relationship, would you go in a temple or mosque and tell the Indian women that a Black man is good to frig them?

Why would this come up in a temple or mosque?

FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:

It seems most of you endorse interracial marriages and screwing. Therefore,  I am convinced that all of you have a Black man in your family. Now it's time to face the hard question: If you so believe in interracial relationship, would you go in a temple or mosque and tell the Indian women that a Black man is good to frig them?

In the first place you would have to take the mosque out of the equation since the Ummah al islam is multitude and mixed.

 

In hinduism, there is no prohibition except in caste and that is not for the ramayana hindu culture from which most of the people from Guyana originate. Rama is blue!

 

Further, they were of all colors even though of similar caste or jats Actually, they were outcast so prohibitions across them did not occur. In Guyana, the British noted this because cohabitation began immediately according to Scoble, in his book the "Hill Coolies" The racism you seem to embrace may have come from religious prohibitions more than racial prohibitions.

 

Indians have always seen to invest in their women the preservation of the borders of their culture. Religious intermarrying would be prohibited. Blacks being mainly Christians and Christianization a bother would have secured the prohibition. Add to that the later political segregation and you have a concertizing the taboo. This is all speculation of course

FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:

It seems most of you endorse interracial marriages and screwing. Therefore,  I am convinced that all of you have a Black man in your family. Now it's time to face the hard question: If you so believe in interracial relationship, would you go in a temple or mosque and tell the Indian women that a Black man is good to frig them?

Here are some questions for you... For how long have you been so retarded? Were you born like this or did it develop over time?

What would it take to get through your thick skull that PEOPLE are a specie, not black, coolie or chiney? Racial boundaries are only meaningful to people like you who have been brainwashed.

A
Originally Posted by Cobra:

It seems most of you endorse interracial marriages and screwing. Therefore,  I am convinced that all of you have a Black man in your family. Now it's time to face the hard question: If you so believe in interracial relationship, would you go in a temple or mosque and tell the Indian women that a Black man is good to frig them?

It's her body and it's her right to choose. It's OK for you to suck a black man lolo and I would tell you that in any temple or mosque.
Mitwah
Originally Posted by Cobra:

You are getting very graphic with your expression. Let's keep the discussion between men and women.

What the fluck does it matter to you if we have black man in our family?

 

What the fluck does it matter to you if we endorse interracial marriages?

 

BTW, you started with the graphic.

What would you do if you have a son and one day you find out he is gay and that his BF is a blackman?

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

I live by very strict standards. So called Brahman, if it so suits you.

Listen murkh, Brahman (āĪŽāĨāĪ°āĪđāĨāĪŪāĪĻāĨ brahman) is the one supreme, universal Spirit that is the origin and support of the phenomenal universe.

 

Your so-called strict standards matter not. You do realize you are not a brahmin. How far do you live from PT. Narsingh?

Mitwah,

 

Perhaps you mistook my spelling or I misspelt it. The correct word is Bramhana. I sense you are trying to engage in a Sanatana vs Aryan Samaj debate.

 

I will refrain from doing so bhai. This debate can heat up.

 

Bramhana, Kshartiya, Vaisya and Sudras. Four divisions of society. Not castes of men as incorrectly injected into a people by a group of wicked caste Bramhanas.

 

I will leave this debate for another day. 

 

Good try though.

FM
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Cobra:

You are getting very graphic with your expression. Let's keep the discussion between men and women.

What the fluck does it matter to you if we have black man in our family?

 

What the fluck does it matter to you if we endorse interracial marriages?

 

BTW, you started with the graphic.

What would you do if you have a son and one day you find out he is gay and that his BF is a blackman?

Mitwah what wrong with you r-ss.  You want to give them men heart attack. Them men can't even imagine and get pass a coolie man with a black woman now you gon tell them men about a black man with a coolie man.  What wrong with you.  Like you want to send them men to hospital with heart problems.

Prashad
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

I live by very strict standards. So called Brahman, if it so suits you.

Listen murkh, Brahman (āĪŽāĨāĪ°āĪđāĨāĪŪāĪĻāĨ brahman) is the one supreme, universal Spirit that is the origin and support of the phenomenal universe.

 

Your so-called strict standards matter not. You do realize you are not a brahmin. How far do you live from PT. Narsingh?

Mitwah,

 

Perhaps you mistook my spelling or I misspelt it. The correct word is Bramhana. I sense you are trying to engage in a Sanatana vs Aryan Samaj debate.

 

I will refrain from doing so bhai. This debate can heat up.

 

Bramhana, Kshartiya, Vaisya and Sudras. Four divisions of society. Not castes of men as incorrectly injected into a people by a group of wicked caste Bramhanas.

 

I will leave this debate for another day. 

 

Good try though.

I am not trying to engage you in a Sanatana vs Aryan Samaj debate. Too often, I have seen you used "Brahman"  incorrectly. Brahmin is the anglicised form  of Brahman. You certainly do not know Brahman, you may know of Brahman, else you would not be a racist and I do not subscribe to your brahminism. Your father may have been a priest, but that does not make you a Brahmana. Check again your genes are diluted and you are mostly likely not even a half caste any jaati.

 

 

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Prashad:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by Cobra:

You are getting very graphic with your expression. Let's keep the discussion between men and women.

What the fluck does it matter to you if we have black man in our family?

 

What the fluck does it matter to you if we endorse interracial marriages?

 

BTW, you started with the graphic.

What would you do if you have a son and one day you find out he is gay and that his BF is a blackman?

Mitwah what wrong with you r-ss.  You want to give them men heart attack. Them men can't even imagine and get pass a coolie man with a black woman now you gon tell them men about a black man with a coolie man.  What wrong with you.  Like you want to send them men to hospital with heart problems.

Namaskar! LOL! the flip side of the analogy can be very revealing. Cobra is a good person, he is just trying to be an agitator.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Cobra:

I can tell you read it because you missed the core question or unable to add anything of substance. You were too busy looking at racist and bigotry that has nothing with the topic. The topic is moral issue and the question is legitimate.

Condemning interracial activity of any nature is racist bigotry. What is the moral issue and for whom is it an issue? Is it possible you don't even understand your own words? Not surprising.... you've always shown an affinity for stringing meaningless words together just because the look good.  

A
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
Originally Posted by yuji22:

I live by very strict standards. So called Brahman, if it so suits you.

Listen murkh, Brahman (āĪŽāĨāĪ°āĪđāĨāĪŪāĪĻāĨ brahman) is the one supreme, universal Spirit that is the origin and support of the phenomenal universe.

 

Your so-called strict standards matter not. You do realize you are not a brahmin. How far do you live from PT. Narsingh?

Mitwah,

 

Perhaps you mistook my spelling or I misspelt it. The correct word is Bramhana. I sense you are trying to engage in a Sanatana vs Aryan Samaj debate.

 

I will refrain from doing so bhai. This debate can heat up.

 

Bramhana, Kshartiya, Vaisya and Sudras. Four divisions of society. Not castes of men as incorrectly injected into a people by a group of wicked caste Bramhanas.

 

I will leave this debate for another day. 

 

Good try though.

I am not trying to engage you in a Sanatana vs Aryan Samaj debate. Too often, I have seen you used "Brahman"  incorrectly. Brahmin is the anglicised form  of Brahman. You certainly do not know Brahman, you may know of Brahman, else you would not be a racist and I do not subscribe to your brahminism. Your father may have been a priest, but that does not make you a Brahmana. Check again your genes are diluted and you are mostly likely not even a half caste any jaati.

 

 

Let me lay this to rest once and for all.

 

The Bhagavad Gita clearly states that Krsna created four divisions of society. Similar to what we see in America, but is has now been polished in America to call people, middle class and working class etc.

NOT four classes of men.  Anyone can elevate himself to the status of a Bramhana.

 

Any citizen can rise above his current status depending his economic situation, similarly, in spiritual life anyone can rise to the status of Bramhana despite birth.

Is this now clear ?

 

Bramhana is not an exclusive club or class of people. Only the wicked so called Bramhanas of India and Guyana used caste to divide people. This is totally unacceptable and is not in confides with dharma or Bhagavad Gita. It was their intention to control other people.

Is this now clear ?

 

As for racist, prove it with one single quote or statement that I made that was offensive to any race, post it.

 

I live by extremely strict codes, that I so choose to live by, inculding no eating of meat, fish, eggs, onions, garlic, coffee tea or any intoxicants including liquor. And yes, I chant 16 rounds per day. Google the word Iskcon, google is your friend.

 

I do not tell you how to live your life. Live it the way you choose and I will live mine the way I choose. I am not superior to anyone nor do I pretend to do so since doing so will make me fall prey to illusion and ego.

 

I follow Iskcon, where Blacks, Whites, Indians and all other races practice according to Vedic rules and yes, we have Black, White, Indians and other races of Bramhanas. Google it.

 

Sanatana Dharma is not exclusive, every race is welcome. Krsna said that he is the seed giving father of ALL living entities. He did not say that he is the father of Indian people alone. 

 

How many animals have you eaten lately ? How many bottles of liquor did you drink lately ? You see, it is your choice. I do not know you personally and cannot judge you and I ask that you do the same.

 

Dharma gives us full independence to choose and we reap the fruits of of our actions. If someone is an atheist, then it his free choice to do so. I have no right to judge or condemn anyone.

 

You seem to have a distaste from Bramhanas because of Swami Dyananad and his Aryan followers keep grinding it like a broken record and your so called Aryan upbringing. That is ok and I respect it. But you constantly attack me and you use vile and foul language on the website yet you lecture on dharma.

 

Don't worry, karma will catch up with you.

 

I have never endorsed Bramhana by birth or caste. Anyone can be elevated to the status of Branhana as long as they adhere to scriptural codes as laid down according to the Vedas.

 

Go lecture to the fanatics mad men in the middle east who kill in the name of religion and who do not respect freedom of speech and expression. Have you seen the news lately ?

 

Peace.

 

 

 

FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:
 

What would you do if you have a son and one day you find out he is gay and that his BF is a blackman?

He would have an instant heart attack and then die of shame.  That would be a true curse from God in his eyes.

Are you sure? He just might beat his son and take away the blackman for himself. ahahahahah

FM
Originally Posted by yuji22:
Let me lay this to rest once and for all.

 

The Bhagavad Gita clearly states that Krsna created four divisions of society. Similar to what we see in America, but is has now been polished in America to call people, middle class and working class etc.

NOT four classes of men.  Anyone can elevate himself to the status of a Bramhana.

 

Any citizen can rise above his current status depending his economic situation, similarly, in spiritual life anyone can rise to the status of Bramhana despite birth.

Is this now clear ?

 

First off, class and caste are not the same. Krishna did not create the four castes. The Brahmins who were the gyaanies, invented this to elevate themselves to the highest of the strata. Hence the numerous findings of contamination of the teachings from the BG.

 

 

Bramhana is not an exclusive club or class of people. Only the wicked so called Bramhanas of India and Guyana used caste to divide people. This is totally unacceptable and is not in confides with dharma or Bhagavad Gita. It was their intention to control other people.

Is this now clear ?

 

 

 

As for racist, prove it with one single quote or statement that I made that was offensive to any race, post it.

 

 Action speaks louder than words. You support racism, cronyism, corruption. You sided with Rev.

 

I live by extremely strict codes, that I so choose to live by, inculding no eating of meat, fish, eggs, onions, garlic, coffee tea or any intoxicants including liquor. And yes, I chant 16 rounds per day. Google the word Iskcon, google is your friend.

 

Like who cares? Anyway this probably explains why you are so cretinous.

 

I do not tell you how to live your life. Live it the way you choose and I will live mine the way I choose. I am not superior to anyone nor do I pretend to do so since doing so will make me fall prey to illusion and ego.

 

You are a person with an exaggerated sense of self-importance; conceit. Remind us again where you reside and what you own and drive.

 

I follow Iskcon, where Blacks, Whites, Indians and all other races practice according to Vedic rules and yes, we have Black, White, Indians and other races of Bramhanas. Google it.

 

Sanatana Dharma is not exclusive, every race is welcome. Krsna said that he is the seed giving father of ALL living entities. He did not say that he is the father of Indian people alone. 

 

How many animals have you eaten lately ? How many bottles of liquor did you drink lately ? You see, it is your choice. I do not know you personally and cannot judge you and I ask that you do the same.

 

Have you listened to your own contradictions?

 

Dharma gives us full independence to choose and we reap the fruits of of our actions. If someone is an atheist, then it his free choice to do so. I have no right to judge or condemn anyone.

 

You seem to have a distaste from Bramhanas because of Swami Dyananad and his Aryan followers keep grinding it like a broken record and your so called Aryan upbringing. That is ok and I respect it. But you constantly attack me and you use vile and foul language on the website yet you lecture on dharma.

 

Don't worry, karma will catch up with you.

 

The language I used I learned from your idol Dr. Bharat Jagdeo.

Karma will catch up with you and your PPP ilks too... Do paatan beech me....

 

I have never endorsed Bramhana by birth or caste. Anyone can be elevated to the status of Branhana as long as they adhere to scriptural codes as laid down according to the Vedas. Unadulturated Nonsense! Not that I support the caste system, since the lower castes are denied religious education, from the Hindu perspective, how can they achieve liberation from their bad karma and achieve moksha? According your concept of the status of Brahmana, they are trapped in the cyle of lower forms, a cycle of "ritual poverty". It makes no sense that only a selected few are allowed to reach God. BTW, I am not a disciple of Swami Dyanand nor samagist.

 

Go lecture to the fanatics mad men in the middle east who kill in the name of religion and who do not respect freedom of speech and expression. Have you seen the news lately ?

 

You are too shallow to fathom me. Stop thinking with your feet.

 

Peace.

 

 

 


Jai Shree Krishna!

Mitwah

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×