* APNU received 40.8% of the votes in 2011.

* The best performance by the PNC in a free election, in terms of percentage was 42.3% back in 1992

* ANYTHING OVER 42.3% BY THE COALITION MUST BE CREDITED TO AFC

Rev

Under Burnham, PNC used to win by landslide...over 70%

This is becoming interesting.

All the possible explanations!!!!!

CaribJ is getting back to being his own self.

As I said I will discuss the AFC when the results are made final.  But IF the PPP wins the AFC must admit that they didn't pull their weight and need not demand 12 seats.  Its clear that APNU got their voters out.

You still are unable to address this measure of the AFC portion of the turnout, eh?

You are still to debunk my notion that any coalition percentage points about 40% is attributable to the normal AFC plus the Moses' votes (of stay-at-home PNC as well as normally disinterested mixed votes and increasingly disaffected PPP Indians). Address this! And stop hiding behind ambiguities after you were ASSERTIVE of AFC's failings, imagined, predictive or otherwise - which betrays your suspicion of anything other than the PNC part of APNU.

It is up to David Granger to do as he sees fit. If he loses he can deliver 12 seats and end up a minor party with no more than 20 seats.  We will see what happens at the next PNC Congress.

A PPP in control of parliament is not listening to any one so the coalition will have no meaning, unless it wins.

The AFC will get their 12 pieces of silver. 

cARIB j SHUP YOUR POKE AND ALLOW THE PIECES TO FALL WHERE THEY HAVE TO.

You are like a snake in the grass.

As far as I am concerned it is looking great for this coalition.

CaribJ your poison can kill you.