Stop the divide and rule policy over the indigenous peoples
Dear Editor,
Allow me the opportunity to share my thoughts with my Amerindian brothers and sisters of Region No. 9, Upper Takatu, Upper Essequibo, “Rupununi” and elsewhere and indeed, all Guyanese.
My dear friends, it was a sad Easter week end for us here at Lethem. The RUPUNUNI RODEO was dominated by the boring political speech by the head of state. He had nothing to say about the rodeo, nothing to tell us about the real old rodeo and honoring those who started Rodeo in the Rupununi. It was only left for him to paint the cattle, horses, cowboys, girls and audience with red and mark them with PPP/C. You went for a holiday, went to see Rodeo, not to Parliament. Parliament is in Georgetown.
Saddest of all was the loss of lives of two young Amerindians. I wish to take this opportunity to offer my condolences to the bereaved families of the deceased.
As sad as it is, we cannot escape the reality of life. Now that the dust is partly settled and the 2014 budget is still fresh in the minds of many, let’s journey back a little and examine the happenings on the 14th,15th and 16th, April . The Amerindian Development Fund (ADF) was not supported by the combined Parliamentary Opposition based on the dissatisfaction of the representatives of Regions 1, 7, 8 and 9 on how precious taxpayers’ money is being used to divide our communities and disrespect the Village Councils. The item of the ADF under contention was and still is the Youth Entrepreneur Apprenticeship Program (YEAP).
Let‘s examine the facts: The ADF means AMERINDIAN DEVELOPMENT FUND and is supported by tax payers money, whether it comes from Guyana or abroad as I understand it.
ADF says nothing about a PPP/C Youth Program. The ADF consists of several components: one is Presidential grants, another is the Youth Entrepreneur Apprenticeship Program; a third is economic ventures. Others are communications, school children, and so on. The Guyana REDD+ Investment Fund (GRIF) is a component only in those years when there are funds allotted to the ADF.
I call on the Executive and Legislative branches of government to sit down with Amerindian leaders and deal with the following general issues :
1. Taking the land titling back under Amerindian village control, including carrying out the surveys themselves, not have the budgets under the control of the Ministry of Amerindian Affairs
2. Ensuring that community development plans actually correspond with the consensus in each village or community rather than being dictated by Ministry of Amerindian Affairs; bearing in mind that only 26 villages are benefitting by $5 million apiece as from mid-2012 from GRIF,. No other GRIF ADF money is currently assigned for direct spend in Amerindian areas – that is, until the full project document is written, there can be no more spending of GRIF money through the ADF. Two-thirds of the GRIF funding for ADF in the first tranche are assigned for spending by Government agencies, including Office of the President.
3. The weakness of education is notorious. The reasons are well-known in general terms but need to be disaggregated village by village. Amerindians need to be more insistent about the quality of teaching and teachers and this is linked to the need for the communities to contribute to provision of adequate teachers’ housing.
4. As climate change impacts more and more on the hinterland of Guyana, each community needs to take more responsibility for providing itself with water in possibly prolonged dry seasons. This requires not only capital expenditure but also training in water management and maintenance of pumps and pipes. Mr. Julio Piereras’ water establishment at Manari is a good example for Villages to store water for livestock and fishes and other wildlife in the dry season and restocking in the wet season.
5. Health. As with education, the health of Amerindians is below the average for Guyana. This is related to the shortage of medical staff within community or within close range. As in other parts of the country, Amerindians need better preventative health education, including nutrition and ante- and post-natal care.
6. Energy. Beginning with the Unserved Areas Hinterland Development Project, funded by IDB, the Government should be given credit for considering how best to provide electrical energy to isolated communities and isolated households within communities. The government also deserves credit for initiating installation of solar panels but the only independent review shows widespread failures in panels or switch gear or wiring. Amerindian communities and villages call for top priority to be given to providing the schools and health centers with adequate and reliable power. This calls for a substantial increase in both capital and recurrent budgets, plus training.
7. Caiman House Field Station in Yupukari provides a model of how to provide education in a facility run on renewable energy. The Bina Hill School for learning is available and does leadership, agriculture, cultural, forestry, IT, business and tourism training. There should be a hundred Caiman Houses and BHIs in Amerindian areas, indeed in all villages in Guyana. Local initiatives like these should be adequately supported financially by the ADF.
As APNU and AFC point out, CSOs should be trained in all these key areas and then assigned to distinct sectors at village level, under the supervision of each Village Council, not under MoAA.
I could expand on this list but these are among the key issues. It is clear that toshaos and senior councillors are not being encouraged or allowed to articulate their key issues to the line ministries and agencies. It should be the job of all Amerindian MPs to work in a non-partisan manner in the development of appropriate spends and verification of deliveries. It is not just the matter of the Presidential Grants and the Amerindian Development Fund, because the bulk of Government spending in Amerindian communities is via the budgets of the line Ministries and agencies other than MoAA. All MPs need help to analyse and to contribute to the formulation of the government budget estimates. That could be secured on a non-partisan basis through the USAID LEAD project; this could be a good example of how to use this LEAD project.
Sidney Allicock