Skip to main content

Source:http://www.guyana.org/govt/robertson_report.pdf

10. By far the most important crop is sugar which, with its by-products, accounts for more than half the Colony's exports. All about 2 per cent. Of the cane is grown on 17 large plantations owned by limited companies, one of which has a controlling interest in the majority of the
plantations.

The incidence of two dry and two wet seasons in British Guiana gives the industry the advantage of being able to reap twice a year, and cane yield per acre is comparable or superior to that of the estates in other parts of the West Indies which have only one harvest period. But the climate favours growth rather than maturity, so that sucrose content is inferior and it takes 10 to 12 tons of cane to make a ton of sugar in British Guiana, as compared with 7 to 9 tons in other areas.

We understand that the cost to the companies of maintaining drainage and irrigation systems amounts, on some estates, to as much as ,1. 15s. for each ton of sugar produced and with this further handicap it is not surprising that production costs are high.

The industry is,however, assured of a market at prices fixed under the Commonwealth Sugar Agreement signed in 1951. Under this Agreement, which will remain in force until at least 1961,British Guiana is guaranteed a market for about 75 per cent. of her sugar exports at a price negotiated in 1950 and reviewed annually in the light of changes in production costs. The total production of raw sugar in 1952 was 242,692 tons, of which about 167,000 tons were exported under the Agreement at a negotiated price substantially higher than that prevailing in the world market.

The remainder was either sold locally or exported to the United Kingdom and Canada at world market prices plus preference. In their Report on the Economic Development of British Guiana the International Bank Mission endorsed the general view of the sugar producers that
expansion of production in the Colony beyond 275,000 tons per anum would, for a number of reasons, be uneconomic.


The cost of production was known,currently the amount of cane to produce a ton of sugar have increased, the past governments should have started diversification in this industry.

The current government will be trying to make this industry more viable,tough road ahead they are being accused of penalizing the people of this industry who are supporters of the opposition party the PPP/C.

 

Replies sorted oldest to newest

skeldon_man posted:
Django posted:
Nehru posted:

So the dunce Jumbies PNC just discovered the wheel.  BLOODY IDIOTS!!!

The bright bhais in PPP miss the bus.

De buss leff dem PNC bais since1955. Dem bin ah look fuh nite bus since den.

That was the year of the split,this 2 yr old din know what he had to brace from the two peas of the same pod,he survived and finally settled in the land of the free.

Django
Last edited by Django
skeldon_man posted:

Thank your mother and father who went through some hard times to make you happy.

Bhai, i am thankful,my single mom (born 1932) raised 4 of us, toiled in the cane and rice fields, had to left school at young age of 16 to assist her parents,also raised 7 of her sisters children after their mother passed away,she is gone now it will be a year soon,the memories are with me until my time reaches.

Django
Last edited by Django
Django posted:
TK posted:

This is true. Sir Eric Williams was one of the first to observe this fact...in a 1945 paper he published in paper.

I never knew it was costly,was reading the report,and found the info, there is also a little piece about rice.

Yes, Guyana's coastal plain is unique. It's a polder system in the tropics that adds cost to agriculture. This same polder system was one of the main reasons why the African peasant farmers could not grow after the initial success of the village movement. However, there was a time when progressive policies by the Fabian Socialist Jock Campbell did account for redistributing profits of sugar to the workers. However Campbell still enjoyed a favorable subsidized price from the British market, hence they were able to make a profit. Subsidized price in the year 2016 is going to be hard to get. The young PPP of the early 1950s did not believe Campbell was left-wing enough and the rest is history. My parents were able to buy their first small flat concrete house in 1953 because of the sugar welfare system this progressive white man established.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×