Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Sugar workers down tools indefinitely

– as GuySuCo refuses to make yearend increases ‘sweeter’

Countrywide strike

Over 7000 workers attached to the Guyana Sugar Corporation (GuySuCo) are now on strike following the Sugar

Thousands of sugar workers on Tuesday downed tools across the country as GuySuCo refuse to accept their Union’s proposals for higher salary increases and Annual Production Incentive Payments for workers

Thousands of sugar workers on Tuesday downed tools across the country as GuySuCo refuse to accept their Union’s proposals for higher salary increases and Annual Production Incentive Payments for workers

Corporation’s reluctance to come up with an acceptable ratio for the workers Annual Production Incentive (API). GuySuCo is offering the workers an API at a ratio of 85,000 tonnes for sugar produced for one extra days pay. This compares with 32,500 tonnes for one extra days pay prior to 2014. In 2014, the workers were paid at a ratio of 46,000 tonnes of sugar produces for one extra day’s pay. On Monday, thousands of workers from four of five estates went on strike. When Guyana Times checked with the sugar estates on Tuesday, 843 harvesters at Skeldon, 958 at Rose Hall, 1000 at Blairmont and 1438 at Albion, were joined by factory workers at all eight of GuySuCo’s estates along with field workers from La Bonne Intention (LBI), Enmore, Uitvlugt and Wales estates. All these workers downed tools.

 

Unreasonable offer The Guyana Agricultural and General Workers Union (GAWU) reported on Tuesday that more than 7000 workers from the sugar industry were on strike. The workers are protesting what they deemed the ‘unreasonable’ offer made by the sugar company with respect to their API. GAWU has proposed five-and-a-half days API while GuySuCo has offered two-and-a-half days. GAWU’s Berbice Regional Supervisor Harvey Tambron told Guyana Times on Tuesday that the offer by the sugar company is “unacceptable.” “Over the years, we had 32,500 tonnes of sugar equivalent to one day’s pay. Last year because of the financial constraints, the situation, GuySuCo and so on we accepted 46,000 tonnes. When we met last Wednesday, we proposed 32,500 and they held on to the 85,000. We decided to consult with the delegation that was there on the same day and it was agreed that we will up out proposal from 32,500 to 37,000 tones.” Although the union and corporation met twice last week to discuss and settle the API for 2015, their discussions ended in limbo. On Friday last, the union and the sugar entity met but could not agree on the API. “GuySuCo asked us what will be the next move so we said to them ‘we met once you said of 85,000, we met on the second time and you said 85,000 and you said you went through with a fine teeth comb, so we will have to tell our comrades on the ground; the membership on the ground. When we come to the people on the ground this is their reaction,” Tambron noted. On March 8, GAWU submitted its wages and salaries proposal but it was not until September 16 that GuySuCo called the Union to have discussions. Then the sugar company informed the unions representing sugar workers that it was not in a position to negotiate wages and salaries and proposed October 7 for those discussions. However the day before the scheduled meeting, GuySuCo by way of letter informed GAWU that could not stick to the agreed meeting and was to wait on the report from the Commission of Inquiry (CoI). However, GAWU argued that the CoI had nothing to do with the negotiation of wages and salaries even though the union supports the CoI. Following a meeting with GAWU’s General Council (the second highest decision making body in GAWU) on October 24, five days after the CoI’s report was given to Agriculture Minister Noel Holder, and a decision was taken to have the workers take shrike action from the October 25 to the 27. On Tuesday, Tambron argued that since the restoration of collective bargaining in 1989, the Union and GuySuCo was always meeting and arriving at a consensus on wages and salaries. However as it stands now, history is in the making as all previous meetings have failed to bear fruit. According to Tambron, other public servants have received increases and sugar workers are also public servants and should be entitled to salary increases. “Sugar is not a private entity, the workers also deserve some thing. What stops GuySuCo from saying next year that they will have to make 95,000 tones or 110,000 tones for a day’s pay? GuySuCo was the one that wanted to replace the API with a profit-based incentive and the sugar workers stood up against that.” In Berbice, only the Albion Estate was grinding on Tuesday as all harvesters at the Blairmont, Rose Hall and Skeldon estates downed tools closing grinding operations. The LBI, Enmore, Uitvlugt and Wales estates ceased all grinding operations. Albion continued to grind with the help of apprentice workers who are still attached to GuySuCo Training School at Port Mourant. Meanwhile, GAWU has said that it is seeking to engage GuySuCo to put forward an acceptable proposal as it relates to the workers API for 2015. However, until such time the strike actions will continue.

GuySuCo concerned about strike However, the Guyana Sugar Corporation in a statement on Tuesday said that it has noted with great concern the current industrial action across the industry by its workers responding to calls from its Union leadership to apply pressure to the financially ailing industry. The sugar company said that it is no secret that the current total revenue is just enough to offset payment of wages and salaries to its employees. “At our second Annual Production Incentive (API) meeting held on Friday November 20, 2015 at LBI, the Corporation offered for every 85,000 tonnes sugar produced one day’s pay API. This equates to 2.7 days for the Corporation expected year’s production of 233,361 tonnes sugar. The delegation was informed that the Corporation will pay these monies no later than March 2016 because of its financial constraints,” the company said in a statement. According to the company, the Union informed that it will not sign onto an agreement with such a high number (tonnes sugar per day’s pay) but has no objection to the Corporation paying the sum to the workers sometime earlier. Further, the company claims that Union representatives noted that they will consult with the Union’s wider membership on the position put forward. “The Corporation had proposed to reconvene on Tuesday of this week. However, the Union requested that after their consultation with the wider membership they will get on to the Corporation on the way forward. Finally, it was agreed that both parties will not speak to the press until we conclude this matter,” the company said. The company said that workers should be encouraged to resume normal duties and work towards achieving their respective weekly targets and earning themselves additional incentives over the next two to four weeks.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

‘Don’t mess with your benefits’ …GuySuCo cautions striking workers

http://guyanachronicle.com/don...ns-striking-workers/

 

By Rabindra Rooplall

MANY workers of the Guyana Sugar Corporation (GuySuCo) will reportedly not qualify for the Annual Production Incentive (API) and other benefits if they continue to strike while the company aims for its targeted 227,000 tonnes sugar production that is to be achieved in the weeks ahead.

 

GuySuCo’s Chief Industrial Relations Manager Deodat Sukhu, made this dire prediction as he informed that GuySuCo had agreed to meet with the Guyana Agricultural and General Workers Union (GAWU) on Friday last to discuss increased wages for workers, but this did not materialise as GAWU had already initiated random strike action on at least three estates, according to GuySuCo.

The company is warning that strike action could jeopardise any talks on wage increases.

 

Sukhu declared that GuySuCo contacted GAWU General Secretary Seepaul Narine yesterday to inform him that the company is looking for total resumption of work before engaging in any further consultation with the union.

“Our current total revenue is barely enough to pay wages. GuySuCo cannot talk under duress; workers need to understand that they need to work. Workers on strike can disqualify themselves for other benefits if they did not acquire 80% of work on duty. By being absent from work, they can disqualify themselves and they can have greater losses,” the Chief Industrial Relations Manager explained.

 

“We have even written to GAWU stating that if strike action continues we would be withdrawing the offer, because [a] strike would only take us more deep into financial difficulty, because we are already trying to make a payment we can’t afford just to fulfil our expectation.”

 

Sukhu said workers must realise that strike action would destroy the industry, which can barely afford to maintain its workers. He said the 2.7 days Annual Production Incentive (API) offered by the corporation can only be paid in March 2016, although the corporation’s position has been rejected by GAWU.

 

Sukhu said he understands that a large percentage of the workers did not want to strike, because they wanted to maximise their earnings and to take the crop off.

 

GuySuCo is optimistic that its 2015 sugar target of 227,443 tonnes will be reached, irrespective of the present industrial action by some workers.

Although GAWU had informed GuySuCo that the strike had been called off, at least on three estates, there was still strike action in the industry; and Sukhu warned that this action could scuttle any talks on wage increases, especially since GAWU is aiming for an unrealistic five days API, which the company is financially unable to pay.

 

Noting that this type of strike action can bring the industry to its knees and result in the workers suffering in the long run, Sukhu said he understands that many impromptu strikes are still being organised by GAWU at the various factories.

 

Government has had to bail out the sugar industry with $28 billion in the last five years alone. And now, with its debt load of $82 billion and an expected $5 billion needed for capital investment, together with anticipated further bailout in 2016, any strike action in the industry would sound the proverbial death knell for the industry.

 

As of week ending November 6, 2015, Skeldon and Blairmont estates have surpassed their weekly target; while Albion, Rose Hall and Enmore estates respectively achieved 91.43%, 90.29% and 90.26% of their production targets.

 

 

WHY NOW
Meanwhile, the current industrial action called by GAWU has forced the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of GuySuCo Mr Errol Hanoman to ask some pertinent questions.


Hanoman reportedly told the Government Information Agency (GINA) that certain questions need to be answered by the union. “Why deny workers additional wages and incentives that they can earn in the three weeks remaining to crop’s end? Why deny GuySuCo from realising its 2015 targeted sugar production? What is there to be gained from this protest action, even as [the] production target is within reach?”

 

The CEO made it clear that the protest action will only make the situation more serious for the sugar company, as sales will be affected along with payment of wages and salaries, and obligations to suppliers. He added that, “Whilst on strike, there can be no engagement, so when the union officially calls off the strike and workers return, then dialogue can resume.”

GuySuCo is just about 13,000 tonnes away from achieving its 2015 sugar target of 227,443 tonnes. According to Hanoman, the target can even be surpassed by at least 6,000 tonnes, which would take production to 233,361 tonnes for the year. The last time GuySuCo achieved a second-crop target was in 2004.

 

As of today, production stood at 133,464 tonnes for the second crop, while the year-to-date total stood at 214,607 tonnes.

Some workers are on strike over the Annual Production Incentive (API) offered by the corporation. Hanoman told GINA on Monday that talks on Friday, with GAWU, regarding the API were left unfinished, after GAWU indicated that they wanted to consult their membership. GuySuCo is offering 2.7 days API which will be paid by March 2016.

 

According to Hanoman, a large number of workers are against strike action at this time. He said the corporation is awaiting their return and is encouraging them to maximise their earnings and to take the crop off.

Django
Last edited by Django

Annual Production Incentive is based on total sugar output for the year.

Regardless of the different positions between GuySuCo and GAWU during the negotiating process, don't sugar workers realize that an indefinite strike will reduce sugar output and thus their API benefit? I don't think all sugar workers are in favour of the strike but, having regard to notorious intimidation of non-strikers historically, they are forced to stay home. In the past, the houses of non-strikers were pelted and some were even burnt down.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
The sugar workers understand that sacrifice is needed to maintain their livelihood. They must bond together and do what is necessary. This government shouldn't treat the backbone workers like step children.
FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The sugar workers understand that sacrifice is needed to maintain their livelihood. They must bond together and do what is necessary. This government shouldn't treat the backbone workers like step children.

the government should close down the sugar estate it will be a blessing in disguise 

FM
The government intention is to close down the sugar industry or sell it to private companies. I already seen a PNC graveyard for sugar. This is an incompetent government we're dealing with.
FM

The Guyana sugar industry was in private hands for around 300 years. It has been state-owned for only 39 years. Privatization is the way forward, in my opinion, but it's up to Granger to decide.

FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:
The government intention is to close down the sugar industry or sell it to private companies. I already seen a PNC graveyard for sugar. This is an incompetent government we're dealing with.

slow-witted dunce for and against "privatization" all at once

 

pulling down he panty and shaking his maggot infested ass obviously more important than reaching for common sense

FM
Privatization is a gamble with the troubled industry at present. The government needs to bail GUYSUCO out, pay the workers and avoid lost of production at all cost for two years before taking the next move. If the industry makes it, you keep it and invest in planting and harvesting machinery.

Ok, pokepie?
FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Cobra:
Privatization is a gamble with the troubled industry at present. The government needs to bail GUYSUCO out, pay the workers and avoid lost of production at all cost for two years before taking the next move. If the industry makes it, you keep it and invest in planting and harvesting machinery.

let's be clear

 

(i) are you in support of placing Sugar in private hands or not? you bray a lot about being some sort of arch capitalist . . . market forces and all that

 

(ii) do you support the necessary, massive canecutter layoffs if/when mechanization of the industry kicks in after your touted "2 years"?

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×