Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

Sugar workers shut down entire industry

The Wales Sugar Factory

The Wales Sugar Factory

…strike for wage increases

 

BY KRISTEN MACKLINGAM

 

Thousands of workers from across the sugar belt officially downed tools on Sunday morning to push for higher wages from the Guyana Sugar Corporation (GuySuCo) with hopes that this latest action would result in their favour.

After announcing last week that all the sugar estates had exceeded their targets, GuySuCo would have been caught unawares by this industrial action. Operations at all sugar factories were adversely affected and will cause GuySuCo to lose millions of dollars as a consequence of the workers’ decision to strike for a three-day period.

Guyana Times understands the workers have ‘retaliated’ after the sugar corporation failed to meet with representatives of the Guyana Agricultural Workers Union (GAWU) to discuss an increase in wages for sugar workers.

Agriculture Minister Noel Holder

Agriculture Minister Noel Holder

A source close to the union told this newspaper on Sunday that GuySuCo is “avoiding” a meeting with GAWU to have dialogue about proposed increases in the wages for sugar workers who are unionised.

“The sugar corporation is avoiding any meeting with GAWU on proposals for the year 2015. Earlier when we had talked to them about it, they told us to wait until the sugar Commission of Inquiry (COI), which was on-going, to be concluded before they would have discussions with GAWU on the matter. However, the COI has been completed. GuySuCo is still not inviting the Union to engage in the talks,” the source stated.

Guyana Times was told that while the COI report is merely a documentation of recommendations and the final decisions are yet to be made, wage increases for sugar workers were not part of the Commission’s mandate.

“Wages is a substantive matter. The COI report is merely recommendations but the gist of the matter from the workers side is that they want wage increases,” the source informed.

This newspaper was told that workers begun their strike action on Sunday morning.

According to the source, the workers turned up on Saturday and worked until midnight. However, no one turned up for the Sunday morning shift.

“Cane harvesters did not go to work today (Sunday) except maybe a few who were not aware of the strike. It is a virtual stand-still,” this publication was further told.

According to the source, if GuySuCo does not meet the demands of its sugar workers, this may result in a prolonged period of strike action and protests until there is an amicable solution.

It must be reminded that over the past few years, before the month of October or during the first week of October, the sugar corporation would have already indicated a pay hike for its workers.

However, it is almost the beginning of November and GuySuCo has failed to do so for 2015. Given the existing dry weather the sugar industry is losing valuable time for harvesting and the strike action will have a domino effect on production.

Canes which have already been harvested but are yet to be processed will spoil and therefore the sugar corporation will lose millions daily as the strike continues.

However, GuySuCo in a press release on Sunday expressed its disappointment with GAWU’s decision to call on its members to proceed on strike action across the country.

“Their actions have affected all field and factory operations, breaking the prevailing production momentum. The Union is demanding that the corporation commence wages, salaries and fringes benefits negotiations for 2015. The corporation and the Union had a preliminary meeting on September 16, where the corporation informed the Union and the representatives from the various estates that it was unable to commence discussion before the Commission of Inquiry has submit its findings and recommendations,” the sugar entity said.

According to GuySuCo it had subsequently advised the leadership of the GAWU (as recently as Friday October 23, 2015), that it would not be able to commence discussion of the Union’s proposal until the COI report has been considered by the Government and advise is given to the corporation on the way forward.

Meanwhile, Agriculture Minister Noel Holder told Guyana Times on Sunday that it is public knowledge that GuySuCo is operating at major losses and cannot afford wage increases at the moment.

As it relates to workers taking strike action because they believe the COI report does not allow for wage increases, the Agriculture Minister explained that the official inquiry’s findings have to be considered and any conclusion drawn before this is done is premature.

“Before they (findings and recommendations) are considered, because the conditions under which the COI was set up was that they are supposed to submit to the Government by a certain time the initial recommendations , Government is supposed to consider those and send them back to the Commission for any elaboration needed and then a final report would be given. We are now at the situation between the initial submission and the final report. In any event, it would be remiss of Government to get involved in any industrial activity between or anything going on with unions at this stage,” said the Agriculture Minister.

He posited that if the Government were to intervene at this point without perusing and deliberating on the results of the COI then it would “make no sense” having a sugar COI.

“You have to rate their findings, you have to look at their findings, and assess them and then if we accept their findings then we have to go along with that. So I would like to think that what the workers are doing is politically motivated. GuySuCo has been doing very well over the last few weeks, meeting its targets and the management we have put have obviously been working and the workers have been responding. I suspect that the opposition does not like this and I suspect that they might be creating these situations for a strike, an unnecessary strike,” he posited.

According to Minister Holder, persons are very aware of the fact that Government can get involved, as it has done before the COI’s report was completed, such as in the case where the Administration assisted GuySuCo with some finances.

“They know that Government can get involved in helping them to have increases and in loss making situations prior to the findings of the COI. As a matter of fact on the COI is a GAWU economist, and obviously GAWU might know what the findings of the COI are because they had someone on it. So we will not get involved as a Government, to get involved in a situation that is being considered based on the findings of a COI which itself has not been accepted. GuySuCo’s future has financial implications for the country and for agriculture,” he added.

Meanwhile, reports are that GuySuCo is effectively ‘bankrupt’ with its total debt amounting to billions of dollars. For a number of years, the Sugar Corporation has been operating at a loss and has only survived because of the previous Administration’s massive subventions.

Guyana Times understands that at present the Sugar Corporation is being smothered under its current debt and the current cost of production is over US40 cents per pound while world market prices are a third of that.

This means the revenue that GuySuCo receives is not enough to cover its operating costs, thus resulting in the Corporation suffering huge losses annually.

It was also recently disclosed that the company is running on debt financing.

In this regard, there are also overdrafts by institutions from which GuySuCo borrows, but has not been able to repay; hence, it is not considered a ‘sustainable’ situation and the company can be declared “technically” bankrupt.

The APNU/AFC coalition Government in July had established the COI into the operations of GuySuCo.

Among the issues raised included the impact of the industry over the next few years, particularly with the current world price of US11.3 cents per pound of sugar and the current European Union price in the region of US15 cents.(kristenm@guyanatimesgy.com)

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Looks like tit-for-tat sabotage to me. One of these days the sugar workers will understand it is better to have a low paying job than no job at all. But I see where they are coming from...since govt ministers paid themselves with 50% raise union bosses (PPP supporters) feel they should extract something...the only problem is the final product they produce at 45cents is sold for 12 cents in the world market. They simply don't produce anything valuable.

FM

For the Agricultural Minister to accuse the opposition of interference is ridiculous.   If Guysuco is bankrupt, how can they continue with sugar production.  The Government should have known that GAWU would called for wage increases on behalf of the sugar workers before they announced that all the sugar estates have exceeded their targets.  This is now a sticky situation.  There is a demarkation between the PPP and GAWU.  The opposition cannot be blamed for GUYSUCO's problems.

R
Originally Posted by Ramakant-P:

For the Agricultural Minister to accuse the opposition of interference is ridiculous.   If Guysuco is bankrupt, how can they continue with sugar production.  The Government should have known that GAWU would called for wage increases on behalf of the sugar workers before they announced that all the sugar estates have exceeded their targets.  This is now a sticky situation.  There is a demarkation between the PPP and GAWU.  The opposition cannot be blamed for GUYSUCO's problems.

Yes, the PPP is responsible for the failure at Guysuco. They destroyed the research department and built Skeldon for US$200 mill when the writing was on the wall in 1995 when WTO evolved from GATT.

FM
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Ramakant-P:

For the Agricultural Minister to accuse the opposition of interference is ridiculous.   If Guysuco is bankrupt, how can they continue with sugar production.  The Government should have known that GAWU would called for wage increases on behalf of the sugar workers before they announced that all the sugar estates have exceeded their targets.  This is now a sticky situation.  There is a demarkation between the PPP and GAWU.  The opposition cannot be blamed for GUYSUCO's problems.

Yes, the PPP is responsible for the failure at Guysuco. They destroyed the research department and built Skeldon for US$200 mill when the writing was on the wall in 1995 when WTO evolved from GATT.

That's not the point here.  The government is trying to say that production target was exceed  because of them.  Bullshyte.   They were gloating when they announced the exceeding of the target.  Now they are crying and saying that they were wrong and too quick to make announcement.  If the PPP were responsible for the bankruptcy, that is not the problem.  The PNC rigged the election and took over the Government and the debts of all departments.  Let them deal with it.   Don't blame the PPP for their ineptness.

R
Last edited by Ramakant-P
Originally Posted by TK:

Looks like tit-for-tat sabotage to me. One of these days the sugar workers will understand it is better to have a low paying job than no job at all. But I see where they are coming from...since govt ministers paid themselves with 50% raise union bosses (PPP supporters) feel they should extract something...the only problem is the final product they produce at 45cents is sold for 12 cents in the world market. They simply don't produce anything valuable.

YOU ARE INDEED AN ASS AND A VERY LARGE SIZE ONE.  THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST ILLITERATE STATATEMENT THAT I CAN THINK OF!!!!!!!!!!

Nehru
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by TK:

Looks like tit-for-tat sabotage to me. One of these days the sugar workers will understand it is better to have a low paying job than no job at all. But I see where they are coming from...since govt ministers paid themselves with 50% raise union bosses (PPP supporters) feel they should extract something...the only problem is the final product they produce at 45cents is sold for 12 cents in the world market. They simply don't produce anything valuable.

YOU ARE INDEED AN ASS AND A VERY LARGE SIZE ONE.  THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST ILLITERATE STATATEMENT THAT I CAN THINK OF!!!!!!!!!!

 Eh...eh...abe classy Richmond Hill model Hindu wake up.

FM
Originally Posted by TK:

Looks like tit-for-tat sabotage to me. One of these days the sugar workers will understand it is better to have a low paying job than no job at all. But I see where they are coming from...since govt ministers paid themselves with 50% raise union bosses (PPP supporters) feel they should extract something...the only problem is the final product they produce at 45cents is sold for 12 cents in the world market. They simply don't produce anything valuable.

That's not the point here.  It's not tit for tat, it's what is rightfully there's.

The sugar workers are carrying the government on their backs.  Why should they be content on a low paying job.  You, yourself left Guyana for a high paying job.  What is good for chamar is good for the chamari. (ha ha ha)

R
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Ramakant-P:

For the Agricultural Minister to accuse the opposition of interference is ridiculous.   If Guysuco is bankrupt, how can they continue with sugar production.  The Government should have known that GAWU would called for wage increases on behalf of the sugar workers before they announced that all the sugar estates have exceeded their targets.  This is now a sticky situation.  There is a demarkation between the PPP and GAWU.  The opposition cannot be blamed for GUYSUCO's problems.

Yes, the PPP is responsible for the failure at Guysuco. They destroyed the research department and built Skeldon for US$200 mill when the writing was on the wall in 1995 when WTO evolved from GATT.

Interesting insight here TK.

However, keep in mind that the coalition is setting a dangerous trend here with this salary increase.

 

However, to call this "tit for tat" is simply a negation of the value of the workers who have been eeking out a living based on poor wages from time immorial. Any transformation of the industry must include largess given to the workers not the big developers and land grabbers, or the government.

V

this not the sixty with jagan the present government can and should shut down all the goddamn estates Indian sugar workers have to look out for their livelihood and do not make politics they first priority for fat cats     

FM

Countrywide strike as sugar workers protest GuySuCo’s refusal to meet at bargaining table

October 26, 2015 11:49 am Category: latest news A+ / A-

File Photo: Sugar workers during a recent protest. [iNews' Photo]

File Photo: Sugar workers during a recent protest. [iNews’ Photo]

[www.inewsguyana.com] – The Guyana Agricultural and General Workers Union (GAWU) says that the sugar industry is not in operation as a result of a strike action by sugar workers, which took effect from Sunday, October 25.

 

According to a statement from GAWU, the immediate reason for this closure has to do with the “continuous postponement” by the Guyana Sugar Corporation Inc (GuySuCo) of discussions with GAWU on the wages issue for this year.

GAWU said that the the Union’s wage claim was submitted to GuySuCo since March 08, 2015.

“The GuySuCo was urged by the Union over the past months to begin negotiations. At a meeting on September 16, 2015, the Corporation fixed October 07, 2015 to begin to address the Union’s claims for wages and adjustment to certain fringe benefits. This date was set to follow the conclusion of the work of the Sugar Commission of Inquiry (COI) which was expected to be on September 30, 2015. However, the Corporation by letter dated October 06, 2015 to the Union requested a further deferment,” the GAWU statement noted.

According to GAWU, in deference to the Corporation, the workers exercised restraint and goodwill.

“The COI report was presented to the Ministry of Agriculture on October 19, 2015. Yet the Union has been unable to get the Corporation to sit at the bargaining table for wages discussions. The Union wishes to point out that GuySuCo’s position is in breach of the Section 23 (1) of the Trade Union Recognition Act (TURA) which states:-

“Where a trade union obtains a certification of recognition for workers comprised in a bargaining unit in according with this Part, the employer shall recognise the union, and the union and the employer shall bargain in good faith and enter into negotiations with each other for the purpose of collective bargaining.”

It was noted that the meeting of the Union’s General Council on October 24, 2015 discussed the prevailing situation with respect to the non-commencement of the negotiations and unanimously agreed to engage in protest action at the Corporation’s breach of the TURA.

“Now, the Union is being told we need to await consideration of the COI report by the Government.”

According to GAWU, General Council members noted that other public sector employees have already been granted wage/salary increases since the passage of the 2015 Budget. However, seemingly sugar workers who are also eligible to benefit from wage increases are not being attended to.

The Union calls upon the Corporation to respect the law and the Collective Labour Agreement (CLA) and allow the unusually positive sugar production momentum to hold.

“The excellent harvesting result should be a strong motivation to GuySuCo at this time to engage the workers’ Union in Collective Bargaining to address the wages negotiations.”

FM
Originally Posted by Ramakant-P:

  If Guysuco is bankrupt, how can they continue with sugar production. 


Through being massively bailed out by the PPP, with APNu/AFC being forced to do the same, when in May, Guysuco claimed that they couldnt meet payroll.

 

Guysuco is a MASSIVE money loser.

FM
Originally Posted by Ramakant-P:

For the Agricultural Minister to accuse the opposition of interference is ridiculous.   If Guysuco is bankrupt, how can they continue with sugar production.  The Government should have known that GAWU would called for wage increases on behalf of the sugar workers before they announced that all the sugar estates have exceeded their targets.  This is now a sticky situation.  There is a demarkation between the PPP and GAWU.  The opposition cannot be blamed for GUYSUCO's problems.

You reason like a cow. Where doe it follow that the industry exceeded its targets that it is solvent? Did you reflect on the fact we produce sugar at 4 times the cost of what it is sold on the international market? How about the Skeldon plant losing 8 tons of cane for every ton of sugar? Old Albion used 11 tons of cane for 1 ton of sugar. The new one uses 19 tons of cane to produce the same amount.

 

Surely the government will have to manage whatever problems crop up. It is reasonable to suggest that industrial action will further compound the problems of an industry that is heavily subsidized. The only casualty to this is the sugar workers themselves. The PPP may use them as a tool for political action but this does not mean they get any benefits. The PPP already screwed them with mismanagement. APNU is their only salvation whether they like it or not.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
. The only casualty to this is the sugar workers themselves. The PPP may use them as a tool for political action but this does not mean they get any benefits. .


What those in rice and sugar must learn is what those in bauxite already learned.

 

Guyana is a high cost and inefficient producer and no one is going to pay more for these products than they have to.  If Guyana cannot compete, no one else cares.

 

Maybe those in rice and sugar should have paid more attention to the plight of the bauxite workers, instead of engaging in their racist notions that the majority workers in the latter industry were black, and therefore undeserving.

 

Lindeners and others had to create alternate means of earning a living, and so might many in the rice/sugar industries.  Guyana CANNOT indefinitely sustain unprofitable industries.

FM
Originally Posted by VishMahabir:
Originally Posted by TK:
Originally Posted by Ramakant-P:

For the Agricultural Minister to accuse the opposition of interference is ridiculous.   If Guysuco is bankrupt, how can they continue with sugar production.  The Government should have known that GAWU would called for wage increases on behalf of the sugar workers before they announced that all the sugar estates have exceeded their targets.  This is now a sticky situation.  There is a demarkation between the PPP and GAWU.  The opposition cannot be blamed for GUYSUCO's problems.

Yes, the PPP is responsible for the failure at Guysuco. They destroyed the research department and built Skeldon for US$200 mill when the writing was on the wall in 1995 when WTO evolved from GATT.

Interesting insight here TK.

However, keep in mind that the coalition is setting a dangerous trend here with this salary increase.

 

However, to call this "tit for tat" is simply a negation of the value of the workers who have been eeking out a living based on poor wages from time immorial. Any transformation of the industry must include largess given to the workers not the big developers and land grabbers, or the government.

I have already said the coalition was wrong to pay themselves 50% at this moment. I saw this coming down the line. The PPP would use the 50% as justification to instigate strikes. I have always seen Guyana's politics since independence as tit for tat strategies to destabilize the government in power. This action by GAWU is just that. The wage bill is already out of proportion for the industry. Nowhere an insolvent company can pay workers more unless some workers are sent home.

FM

Look at this jackass Minister:

 

Meanwhile, Agriculture Minister Noel Holder toldGuyana Times on Sunday that it is public knowledge that GuySuCo is operating at major losses and cannot afford wage increases at the moment.

 

And what the ??? Guyana operating at so they could pay themselves raises?  Looko eyepass.

FM
Originally Posted by TK:

Looks like tit-for-tat sabotage to me. One of these days the sugar workers will understand it is better to have a low paying job than no job at all. But I see where they are coming from...since govt ministers paid themselves with 50% raise union bosses (PPP supporters) feel they should extract something...the only problem is the final product they produce at 45cents is sold for 12 cents in the world market. They simply don't produce anything valuable.

And what are the politicians producing?

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by TK:
 

I have already said the coalition was wrong to pay themselves 50% at this moment. I saw this coming down the line. The PPP would use the 50% as justification to instigate strikes. I have always seen Guyana's politics since independence as tit for tat strategies to destabilize the government in power. This action by GAWU is just that. The wage bill is already out of proportion for the industry. Nowhere an insolvent company can pay workers more unless some workers are sent home.

These are the people you helped usher into power, stop blaming the PPP and hold your government accountable. 

 

In fact you have selective memory, GAWU has a mind of its own, how many times did they strike and burn canefields during the PPP rule? Pay attention to the date below in case you didn't remember.

 

SUGAR STRIKE ENDS – as GAWU, GuySuCo sign agreement – Reconciliation talks set for tomorrow

 

SUGAR workers at Skeldon and Rose Hall sugar estates ceased their strike action as of yesterday, according to President of the Guyana Agricultural and General Workers Union (GAWU), Mr. Komal Chand.

The Union’s Head, in an invited comment yesterday, told the Guyana Chronicle that reconciliation talks are scheduled for Friday, to address the problem at the Skeldon Estate, which led to the strike.
He explained that six conditions were agreed to by the Union and the Guyana Sugar Corporation (GuySuCo) yesterday. They are as follows:
1. The strike by field and factory workers attached to Skeldon and Rose Hall that were ongoing as of yesterday will end;
2. The Union will ensure full resumption of duties by field and factory workers from today;
3. Within 24-hours, after resumption of duties, the aggrieved parties, including GAWU, will meet with the Chief Labour Officer, who will make a final decision on the matter;
4. There will be no victimization on either side because of strike actions;
5. All workers who were on strike will not have their ‘strike day’ counted as absent, but as days not available for work; and
6. That the dismissal of the Skeldon factory employee, Mr. Steven Daniels, will be now treated as a suspension, without pay, until the end of the reconciliation talks.
“If the reconciliation talks prove unfruitful, then we will move to arbitration,” Mr. Chand said.
The GAWU Head added that the conditionalities will pave the way for field and factory workers to return to work, while the issue at the root of the strike is being addressed, simultaneously.
“I am satisfied that we reached a position of compromise,” he said.
Chand stated too that the planned one-day strike action at Blairmont Estate is not expected to proceed in light of the agreement. Also, Albion sugar estate workers had staged a one-day strike on Tuesday, in support of their colleagues at Skeldon.
PROBLEM
The GAWU President, in an earlier comment, had explained that the strike stemmed from an alleged altercation between Estate Manager, Mr. Dave Kumar and Daniels, a worker at the Skeldon sugar estate.
He said the report he received is that last Friday, at around 11:30pm, the estate manager, who had allegedly been consuming alcohol, was on his way to the Dock Mill, where a cane harvest had been offloading. Before he reached there, he met several workers and reportedly asked them to move. The allegation is that all the workers did not remove immediately and the estate manger became incensed.
“The report we have is that the worker was verbally abused, he was cursed at, and there was a scuffle where the estate manger allegedly attempted to hit him,” Chand had said.
He added that the worker continued working, but was later informed that he was fired and escorted off the premises by the estate’s security personnel.
As a result, workers moved to strike action.
BLAME GAME
Additionally, there has been some play at the blame game, with the all the stakeholders taking hits as being responsible for the prevailing unease in the sugar belt.
While GAWU stood on the side of the Skeldon factory employee, GuySuCo had initially put their weight behind the Skeldon Estate Manager.
Yesterday, GuySuCo in a statement, said, “The type of behaviour that was displayed by Mr. Daniels is recognized by the Corporation as one that constitutes gross misconduct, and such behaviour is treated with summary dismissal; as a consequence Daniels was summarily dismissed last Saturday.
“…the Corporation wishes to restate, as it did in a previous statement, that the Estate Manager in his usual night visits to the factory and mill dock met a group of workers that included Steven Daniels who were malingering in the vicinity of the mill dock and cautioned them to report to their respective work stations. On being cautioned by the Manager, Daniels became abusive and was calmly advised by the Manager to heed his advice and report to his work station. Daniels subsequently retaliated and approached the Estate Manager in a hostile manner, and in the process struck the Manager in his face. The incident was witnessed by the Agriculture Manager and a Supernumerary Constable, all of whom testified that the Estate Manager was not intoxicated nor was he aggressive and abusive to Daniels.”
Despite the variations in the stories, the involved parties have agreed to meet to discuss the problem.
Also, the Federation of Independent Trade Unions of Guyana (FITUG), disclosed that it has obtained “irrefutable evidence” that is contrary to GuySuCo’s statement. “Our information is that Daniels was not delinquent during his work engagement on the day of the incident,” the Union said in a statement issued yesterday.
FITUG IN SOLIDARITY
The Union has also made clear that it stands by its affiliate, GAWU.
“FITUG, after obtaining a full account of the incident between the Estate Manager and worker, Stephen Daniel, which occurred on the night of (Friday) September 19, 2014, has concluded that the decision to dismiss Daniel by the Estate Manager lacks propriety,” the body said.
According to the Union, the Estate Manager ought not to have determined any disciplinary action, given his personal involvement in the issue.
“The Corporation seems bent in upholding the Estate Manager’s untenable and rash decision at all costs,” FITUG bemoaned.
The Union contends that GuySuCo’s position is unfortunate considering that the Estate Manager’s conduct was the determining factor that led to the escalating strike actions at the different estates.
On that note, FITUG reiterated its position, to stand firmly behind GAWU, to have the present dispute settled without further delay in the interest of the industry, its workforce, the Corporation and the nation at large.
“FITUG urges the management of GuySuCo, working together with the recognized Union, GAWU, to ensure that the strike is ended forthwith. The industry can ill-afford such stoppages,” the Union appealed.
SECOND SUGAR CROP
The escalating strike action is expected to affect the production for the second sugar crop.
The first crop was successful, surpassing the 75,000 tonnes target, bringing in about 80,000 tonnes. The overall target for 2014 has been moved from 216,000 tonnes to 219,000 tonnes. Sugar production came in at a dismal 186,500 tonnes for 2013, but Guyana has been taking steps to turn around the sugar industry and hopes to meet the 300,000 tonnes-target soon, with a projection that the sector will reach its 400,000-tonne goal by 2020.

(By Vanessa Narine)

 

FM
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by TK:

Looks like tit-for-tat sabotage to me. One of these days the sugar workers will understand it is better to have a low paying job than no job at all. But I see where they are coming from...since govt ministers paid themselves with 50% raise union bosses (PPP supporters) feel they should extract something...the only problem is the final product they produce at 45cents is sold for 12 cents in the world market. They simply don't produce anything valuable.

And what are the politicians producing?

even more ignorance from the 'undercover' Sanata proxy

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:

THE POOR SUGAR WORKERS ARE NOT ASKING FOR A 50% INCREASE.  THEY SIMPLY WANT TO BE ABLE TO BUY BREAD AND BUTTER FOR THEIR FAMILIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Poor sugar workers there were poor last year last 6 month and now u know u drunken fool when the ppp was paying Singh a fortune you was still drunk

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×