Skip to main content

Jul 20, 2016 Source

The ethnic compartmentalization of Guyana’s population has been published. The outlay is not only interesting but deeply intriguing. The very first thing readers must and should know – the numbers are not equivalent to the voting age. For example, East Indians are just over 80,000 more than African Guyanese. But that doesn’t mean there are 80,000 more Indian voters than African voters. It is definite that when you break down the age groups, there aren’t 80,000 more Indian voters than African voters.
The rising group in Guyana’s demography which the 2012 census revealed is the mixed race category. When the PPP’s Stalinist hierarchy analyzes the statistics, one wonders if there isn’t going to be cardiac arrest. The mixed race compartment in the electoral arena normally does not vote in large numbers for the PPP. The growing section along with the mixed race category is the Amerindians. A simple assessment should go like this; for the PPP to win a majority it has to collect the totality of Indian ballots with the Amerindians or the mixed race, or both, sending it over the 50 percent mark.
The problem with the PPP is that Amerindians normally vote for their patrons. There is nothing condescending about this statement. It has been the behavioral pattern in the Amerindian world. If Minister Jones provides the village with resources to enable development, the village will vote for Minister Jones when he becomes a candidate.
The mixed race and Africans will not choose the PPP. And there is at least an eight percent figure of the Indian population that would frown on voting for the likes of Clement Rohee, Roger Luncheon, Gail Teixeira, Donald Ramotar and Bharrat Jagdeo. Make no mistake; those are the personalities that will lead the PPP into the 2020 general elections.
If the PPP is going to win it has to go into one direction only. That pathway could bring it that eight percent figure of Indian votes and a share of mixed race ballots. The PPP has to transform itself into a modern, democratic, multi-racial party with clean leaders who did not participate in the thirteen-year rampage of Jagdeo and Ramotar.
These leaders have to move away from the sordid legacies of Jagdeo and Ramotar, apologize for mistakes made, and openly elect its hierarchy through a process of membership vote. I don’t think that will happen, and my prediction is that unless those changes come, then the PPP will lose in 2020. Civilizing the Stalinist mind that is congenitally autocratic is beyond the capacity of the greatest philosopher. Civilizing the Philistine mind is beyond the ability of the greatest psychologist.
We come now to the PNC. I say PNC because in 2020, the PNC will enter the race as APNU, but there will no longer be the WPA and those paper organizations that make up APNU. For symbolic reasons, the PNC will retain the acronym, APNU. The 2012 census shows that the African part of Region Four’s population is 40 percent. If every African in Region Four votes for the PNC, it will not win. Since there is no significant Amerindian population in Region Four, the PNC will need either the Indian voter or mixed race support to win Region Four.
Transferring the Region Four scenario to the general country, for the PNC to win in 2020, it will need all the African ballots and mixed race and Amerindian votes. Is this possible? I doubt it.
First, let’s get out of the way the Indian thing. Indians will not vote for the PNC in 2020, despite what is going to be a nice, democratic phase of Granger’s performance. The mixed race group is not electorally loyal and regimented as Indians and Africans. If the Granger Government does insensitive, heartless and egregious things, I do not think the mixed race voters will be as eager to return the PNC to office.
And if all Amerindian votes go to the PNC together with all the African votes, it will not be strong enough to take the PNC over the 50 percent mark. Also the census reveals that Africans are not the majority any longer in Region 10. What the 2012 census indicates is that the PNC has to be performing superbly with strong democratic instincts if it is going to win the 2020 poll.
Finally, the AFC. If the AFC is going to bring anything to a Coalition victory in 2020, it needs to take a look at the 2012 census statistics for Regions Three, Five and Six. Can the AFC still secure the Indian embrace in those regions?

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It does not matter about %, the days Indians in Guyana is rapidly coming to as end.  In 50 or so years, Guyana Indians will be as invisible as Jamaican Indians!  The well orchestrated banditry aimed at Indians will ensure Indians are cleansed and killed off.  The Americans will own Guyana and the Brazilians and Venezuelan will be plucking to get their piece.

FM
KishanB posted:

Is this what passes for political analysis today in Guyana.  Come one Freddie, you can do better than this.  This was analysis paralysis.

What was so wrong about this analysis of the changing ethnic composition and how it impacts politics?

The following points are evident.

1.  The Indian identified population is shrinking, and the African identified population isn't growing. These are the two segments which are most rigid in their ethnic voting habits.

2.  The mixed identified population is increasing. Who these people are no one is saying, because I very much doubt that there are more visibly mixed people in Region 10 than there are blacks. But suffice to say that the voting habits of these people will be less rigid.

3.  The Amerindian vote for their "patrons".  Granger knows this and is pouring much energy into this community, so the PPP will have lost much of its support base. In fact the loss of Linden and Mabaruma to the coalition in the LGE should signal to the PPP that their days of domination of the Amerindian vote has ended.

So Guyana is no longer a nation where an ethnic group is so dominant that a party can expect victory based on getting that vote, and attaching  sliver of cross ethnic votes.   Granger realizes this, but does Jagdeo.

The only analysis that I would want to see is some one studying who these mixed people are. What we know is that this isn't a monolithic bloc built around a singular identity, and in fact many might in fact have fluid ethnic identities.  But then this would require way more in depth analysis than a journalist can do, given that the census data will be of no help in that regard.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×