THE AFC IS ATTEMPTING TO HOODWINK GUYANESE
April 21, 2014, By KNews, Filed Under Features/Columnists, Peeping Tom, Source
The Alliance for Change (AFC) is attempting to hoodwink the Guyanese people over its non-approval of the Amerindian Development Fund (ADF). Its latest foray in defence of its decision to not approve budgetary support for the ADF is one such example of hoodwinking the people of this country.
In a full page advertisement, published in yesterdayβs edition of this newspaper, the AFC contends that it did not support the ADF because of concerns over accountability and also because it prefers to see the monies being used to build a technical institute for the hinterland.
The AFC seems to have developed a case of Alzheimerβs over the ADF. The Amerindian Development Fund is not an ad hoc arrangement. It is part of the Guyana Red-Investment Fund (GRIF) which is responsible for administering projects under the Low Carbon Development Strategy. It is an undertaking with developed project plans, timelines and reporting requirements consistent with standards and best practices established by the UNDP. The ADF is being implemented by the United National Development Project which appoints the Project Manager.
Further, the disbursement of funds from GRIF for this project is overseen by the GRIF Steering Committee. It should be recalled that it was the AFC, which prior to the 2011 elections, had demanded such a mechanism to ensure greater transparency for funds received under the LCDS.
The PPPC government does not have arbitrary control over the funds of this project. The project has a budget and there is a strict financial disbursement mechanism in place. There are project outputs and timelines, with each output having a specific budget.
All of this is no secret. It is public information that is available on the GRIF website.
The Community Development Projects under the ADF were not developed at Freedom House. These projects were conceived and developed by the Amerindian communities themselves, not by the government.
The communities have ownership of these projects. According to publicly available information, a CDP is required to be approved by a village general meeting, via consensus or majority vote and all residents are encouraged to participate in the entire project.
A key element of the entire process is the development of a transparent disbursement mechanism. Indeed, the UNDP has gone to great lengths to ensure that this system is in place in the initial phases of the project before the bulk of the 1.8 billion dollars designated for the project is disbursed.
It is disturbing, extremely disturbing that the AFC is now claiming that the reasons why it disapproved of the ADF was because of concerns over the use of previous sums approved in previous years. What is the AFC suggesting? Is it suggesting that the UNDP has mismanaged the process? Is it fawning ignorance of the plans to develop a transparent and accountable financial disbursement mechanism?
And how come the AFC which has been involved in the work of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) did not raise questions before about the use of the funds assigned to the ADF?
But even more disturbing is the suggestion by the AFC that the funds for the next phase should go towards building a Technical Institute. What is the AFC suggesting here? Is it suggesting that the CDP projects developed by the Amerindian communities be dumped, that all the work done by the UNDP be discarded and that the entire project be reshaped so that a technical institute can be established rather than allow the Amerindian communities to have control over the projects which they would have agreed upon?
The idea of building a technical institute with the ADF funds is beyond comprehension. First of all, the ADF caters for wide ranging projects including technical training, agriculture, agro-processing, village infrastructure, tourism, and village business enterprise and transportation. Why would the AFC want to limit the range of projects under the ADF?
Where did the AFC come up with the ludicrous idea of a technical institute? The ADF is intended to benefit Amerindian communities scattered and located in sprawling regions. These communities are widely dispersed, many of them are small and they are not integrated with each other.
Where then does the AFC propose to build this technical institute? If it builds it in Region One, how would the Amerindians from Region Eight and Region Seven and Region Nine benefit from this technical institute?
This is where the YEAP comes in. Under YEAP, small and flexible training programmes geared to the size and needs of specific Amerindian communities can be developed. YEAP will allow for more persons to benefit and benefit more meaningfully from training.
The Amerindian people developed the CDPs and they developed it based on their understanding of their own needs.
To suggest therefore that instead of these CDPs there should be a technical institute can only lead to the inference that the AFC believes that it knows more than the Amerindians about what is good for indigenous communities. It does not.